Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-5-3 Saturday!
SHANG J X, YAO X H, XIE D Q, YAO Y H. Analysis of performance and quality of forage triticale mixed with leguminous crops. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(9): 2143-2154. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0683
Citation: SHANG J X, YAO X H, XIE D Q, YAO Y H. Analysis of performance and quality of forage triticale mixed with leguminous crops. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(9): 2143-2154. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0683

Analysis of performance and quality of forage triticale mixed with leguminous crops

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    YAO Youhua E-mail: youhua8888@126.com

  • Received Date: December 07, 2023
  • Accepted Date: May 06, 2024
  • Available Online: August 14, 2024
  • The aim of this study was to find a high-yield and high-quality forage production model for mixed crops of grass and legumes suitable for promotion in the agricultural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province. This study was performed to analyze the forage production model of × Triticale Wittmack, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, Vicia sativa, and Vicia villosa under mono-cropping and different proportions of mixed cropping. The results showed that mixing rye with legume crops significantly affected legume crop phenology and plant height (P < 0.05) and had no significant effects on rye phenology and plant height (P > 0.05). The total dry weight after M treatment (× Triticale Wittmack 150 kg·ha−1 + V. sativa 150 kg·ha−1) was 8500.4 kg·ha−1, which was significantly higher than the other treatments and with a stronger mixing advantage. No significant differences in crude protein were observed between the mixed crop treatments and small rye monocrop, whereas crude fat, soluble sugar, crude fiber, nitrogen-free leachate, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents were mostly higher in the mixed crop treatments than in the small rye monocrop. The optimal mixing combination of wheat and legume crops and optimal sowing rate of mixing were obtained using a comprehensive evaluation with principal component analysis and affiliation function analysis: × Triticale Wittmack 150 kg·ha−1 + V. sativa 150 kg·ha−1, as evaluated using the affiliation function analysis. It can be popularized and used in the intertwined agricultural and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province, to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the efficient production of high-quality forage in the agricultural and pastoral intertwined areas.

  • [1]
    张瑜, 高碧荣, 龙忠富, 李娟. 8份饲用小黑麦在贵阳的生态适应性及生产性能评价. 贵州畜牧兽医, 2016, 40(4): 52-56.

    ZHANG Y, GAO B R, LONG Z F, LI J. Ecological adaptability and production performance evaluation of 8 triticale varieties in Guiyang. Guizhou Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 40(4): 52-56.
    [2]
    赵方媛, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦萌发期抗旱条件模拟和抗旱指标的筛选. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(2): 96-102.

    ZHAO F Y, TIAN X H, DU W H. Screening on drought simulation conditions and drought-resistant parameters at germination stage of triticale. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(2): 96-102.
    [3]
    戴宝生, 黄晓丽, 李蔚, 闫振华, 张华崇, 赵树琪. 小黑麦在黄冈市作为青贮饲料的适应性试验. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(4): 98-99, 112.

    DAI B S, HUANG X L, LI W, YAN Z H, ZHANG H S, ZHAO S Q. Study on introduction experimental of planting triticale in Huanggang City. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 57(4): 98-99, 112.
    [4]
    何江峰, 赵萌莉, 郑轶慧, 李敏. 小黑麦的饲用特性及其在草地生态中的应用前景. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(1): 101-107.

    HE J F, ZHAO M L, ZHENG Y H, LI M. Forage characteristics and application perspective of triticale in grassland ecology. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2012, 34(1): 101-107.
    [5]
    李冬梅, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦新品系的草产量及营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169.

    LI D M, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on the forage yield and nutritional value of new triticale lines. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169.
    [6]
    赵丹, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘肃省定西地区20 个饲草型小黑麦新品系的适宜播种期. 草业科学, 2016, 33(4): 722-730. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0314

    ZHAO D, TIAN X H, DU W H. The suitable sowing date for 20 new triticale lines in Dingxi region of Gansu rovince. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(4): 722-730. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0314
    [7]
    代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华, 吴建平. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72.

    DAI H L, TIAN X H, DU W H, WU J P. Study on grass yield and nutrient quality of forage type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72.
    [8]
    张辉辉, 师尚礼, 武蓓, 李自立, 李小龙. 苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播效应研究. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 159-170.

    ZHANG H H, SHI S L, WU B, LI Z L, LI X L. A study of yield interactions in mixed sowings of alfalfa and three perennial grasses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 159-170.
    [9]
    祝玲敏, 安文芝, 高丽莉. 微量元素与激素混合液浸种在旱地饲用豌豆上的增产效益研究. 草业科学, 2007, 24(10): 57-62.

    ZHU L M, AN W Z, GAO L L. Tudy on effects of soaking seeds with traceel ement and PGR mixture on feed pea on dry land. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(10): 57-62.
    [10]
    王东霞, 王伟, 李春喜, 宗渊, 曹东, 刘宝龙. 青海省不同海拔生态区饲用小黑麦生产性能分析. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(18): 6216-6228.

    WANG D X, WANG W, LI C X, ZONG Y, CAO D, LI B L. Analysis on production performance of forage triticale in different altitude ecological regions of Qinghai Province. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(18): 6216-6228.
    [11]
    王清韵, 周丁扬, 安萍莉, 姜广辉. 自然保护地政策对区域生态环境质量的影响: 以三江源地区为例. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1349-1359.

    WANG Q Y, ZHOU D Y, AN P L, JIANG G H. Impacts of nature reserve policy on regional ecological environment quality: A case study of Sanjiangyuan. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(5): 1349-1359.
    [12]
    徐田伟, 赵新全, 张晓玲, 王循刚, 耿远月, 胡林勇, 赵娜, 毛绍娟, 刘宏金, 康生萍, 马力, 韩学平, 贾功雪, 赵亮, 董全民, 柴沙鸵, 徐世晓. 青藏高原高寒地区生态草牧业可持续发展: 原理, 技术与实践. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6324-6337.

    XU T W, ZHAO X Q, ZHANG X L, WANG X G, GENG Y Y, HU L Y, ZHAO N, MAO S J, LIU H J, KANG S P, MA L, HAN X P, JIA G X, ZHAO L, DONG Q M, CHAI S T, XU S X. Sustainable development of ecological grass-based livestock husbandry in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau alpine area: Principle, technology and practice. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2020, 40(18): 6324-6337.
    [13]
    李春喜, 叶润蓉, 周玉碧, 孙菁, 杜岩功, 郭小伟. 高寒牧区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播生产性能及营养价值评价. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(5): 40-45.

    LI C X, YE R R, ZHOU Y B, SUN J, DU Y G, GUO X W. Evaluation on production performance and nutritive value of oat and common vetch mixture in alpine pastoral region. Grassland and Turf, 2016, 36(5): 40-45.
    [14]
    秦燕, 刘勇, 张永超, 梁国玲, 刘文辉. 不同混播比例对燕麦和箭筈豌豆混播草地植物生长特征的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1768-1774.

    QIN Y, LIU Y, ZHANG Y C, LIANG G L, LIU W H. Effects of mixed ratios on plant growth characteristics in mixed grassland of the oat and vetch pea. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1768-1774.
    [15]
    韩志林, 车敦仁, 周青平, 王柳英. 青海东部农区不同山地燕麦与箭舌豌豆混播试验初报. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 1992, 22(4): 18-19, 28.

    HAN Z L, CHE D R, ZHOU Q P, WANG L Y. An experiment on mix-sowing of oats and common vetch in farming area of QingHai. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1992, 22(4): 18-19, 28.
    [16]
    齐文嘉, 杜文华, 刘海波, 田新会. 陇东旱塬区一年生禾豆混播草地生产性能与营养价值研究. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(12): 42-50.

    QI W J, DU W H, LIU H B, TIAN X H. Study on the production performance and nutritive value of annual mixed grass-legume in the rainfed plateau area of Longdong. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023, 45(12): 42-50.
    [17]
    魏希杰, 冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 钱诗祎, 林伟山. 三江源区不同禾豆混播处理对饲草品质及土壤养分的影响. 草业科学, 2023, 40(9): 2348-2362. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0624

    WEI X J, FENG T X, Dekejia, XIANG X M, QIAN S Y, LIN W S. Study on the effect of different grass and bean mixture treatments on foragequality and soil nutrients in the Sanjiangyuan area. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(9): 2348-2362. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0624
    [18]
    刘彦培, 薛世明, 钟绍丽, 刘云松, 蔡明, 侯洁琼, 张博琰, 匡崇义, 徐驰, 高月娥, 吴梦霞, 张美艳. 滇西北高海拔地区小黑麦与饲用豌豆混播草地综合评价. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2497-2504.

    LIU Y P, XUE S M, ZHONG S L, LIU Y S, CAI M, HOU J Q, ZHANG B Y, KUANG C Y, XU C, GAO Y E, WU M X, ZHANG M Y. Comprehensive evaluation of mixed grassland of triticale and feeding pea in high-elevation of northwestern Yunnan. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2497-2504.
    [19]
    刚永和, 张海博, 陈永珑, 杜江, 安林昌, 牛勇, 萨仁花, 徐强. 青海东部农区小黑麦与豆科牧草的混播组合与混播比例. 草业科学, 2021, 38(11): 2274-2285. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0182

    GANG Y H, ZHANG H B, CHEN Y L, DU J, AN L C, NIU Y, Sarenhua, XU Q. Mixture combination and mixed ratio of triticale and legumes in the eastern agricultural region of Qinghai. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(11): 2274-2285. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0182
    [20]
    西然朋措, 魏希杰, 周洛, 乃久, 卓玛, 德科加, 冯廷旭. 称多县禾豆混播对牧草产量和品质的影响研究. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2020, 50(6): 15-20.

    Xiranpengcuo, WEI X J, ZHOU L, Naijiu, Zhouma, Dekejia, FENG T X. Study on effect of mixed sowing of grass and beans on yield and quality of forage in Chengduo County. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2020, 50(6): 15-20.
    [21]
    COP J, LAVRENCIC A, KOSMELJ K. Morphological development and nutritive value of herbage in five temperate grass species during primary growth: Analysis of time dynamics. Grass and Forage Science, 2009, 64(2): 122-131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00676.x
    [22]
    耿小丽, 韩天虎, 张少平, 李德明, 刘乾, 武慧娟. 30个燕麦品种(品系)在甘肃天祝地区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1743-1750.

    GENG X L, HAN T H, ZHANG S P, LI D M, LIU Q, WU H J. Adaptability evaluation of 30 oat germplasm in Tianzhu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1743-1750.
    [23]
    JONATHAN S, DEBORAH C. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 1982: 147-155.
    [24]
    罗礽兰, 胡道武, 王静静, 潘兆娥, 贾银华, 何守朴, 王立如, 庞保印, 陈全家, 杜雄明. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数的棉花种子萌发期耐涝性鉴定评价. 中国棉花, 2023, 50(3): 1-5.

    LUO R L, HU D W, WANG J J, PAN Z E, JIA Y H, HE S P, WANG L R, PANG B Y, CHEN Q J, DU X M. Identification and evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of cotton seed at germination stage based on the principal component analysis and subordinate function. China Cotton, 2023, 50(3): 1-5.
    [25]
    富新年, 潘正武, 孟祥君, 曹永林, 李春涛, 张起荣. ‘甘引1号’黑麦农艺性状与鲜草产量的关系. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 433-436.

    FU X N, PAN Z W, MENG X J, CAO Y L, LI C T, ZHANG Q R. The relationship of agronomic traits fresh forage yield of Secale cereale L. ‘ganyin No1’. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(2): 433-436.
    [26]
    李文博. 禾豆间作的影响域模型和试验验证. 兰州: 兰州大学硕士学位论文, 2023.

    LI W B. Zone-of-influence model of cereal-legume intercropping and its experimental validation. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023.
    [27]
    马军, 郑伟, 张博, 加孜依拉·哈勒克. 基于马营养需求的燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播草地生产性能的评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348

    MA J, ZHENG W, ZHANG B, Jiaziyila·Haleke. Production performance evaluation of oat -commom vetch mixed pasture based on nutrient needs of horses. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348
    [28]
    关正翾, 娜尔克孜, 朱亚琼, 郑伟, 刘岳含, 艾丽菲热. 不同混播方式下燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产性能及土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0341

    GUAN Z X, Naerkezi, ZHU Y Q, ZHENG W, LIU Y H, Ailifeire. Effect of different sowing patterns on production performance and soil nutrients in Avena sativa + Vicia sativa mixtures. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0341
    [29]
    冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 魏希杰, 徐成体, 王伟, 钱诗祎, 林伟山. 三江源区小黑麦与豆科饲草混播最佳组合及比例研究. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(2): 232-241.

    FENG T X, Dekejia, XIANG X M, WEI X J, XU C T, WANG W, QIAN S Y, LIN W S. Optimal combination and proportion of triticale and leguminous forage grass in established artificial grassland at Three-river Source Region. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 232-241.
    [30]
    刘闯, 胡庭兴, 李强, 李仁洪, 谢财永, 吴小山. 巨桉林草间作模式中牧草光合生理生态适应性研究. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 58-65.

    LIU C, HU T X, LI Q, LI R H, XIE C Y, WU X S. Study on the photosynthesis and physiological adaptability of herbage in Eucalyptus grandis herbage inter-cropping system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(1): 58-65.
    [31]
    TA T C. Effects of alfalfa proportions and clipping frequencies on timothy-alfalfa mixtures. Agronomy Journal, 1987, 79(5): 817-820. doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900050012x
    [32]
    王富强, 向洁, 郭宝光, 邵小明. 拉萨河谷区豆禾牧草混播比例、施氮、灌溉对生物量的影响. //2017中国草学会年会论文集. 广州: 中国草学会, 2017.

    WANG F Q, XIANG J, GUO B G, SHAO X M. Effects of bean and grass pasture mix ratio, nitrogen application and irrigation on biomass in Lhasa valley area. //Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Grass Society of China in 2017. Guangzhou: Chinese Grassland Society, 2017.
    [33]
    马春晖, 韩建国. 高寒地区种植一年生牧草及饲料作物的研究. 中国草地, 2001, 23(2): 50-55.

    MA C H, HAN J G. Studies on cultivated annual forage and crop in high-cold area. Chinese Journal of Grassland. 2001, 23(2): 50-55.
    [34]
    邹小艳, 罗彩云, 徐世晓. 不同种牧草的产量和品质. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 1064-1067.

    ZOU X Y, LUO C Y, XU S X. Production and quality of different forage species. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 1064-1067.
    [35]
    畅宝花, 张艳秋, 翟书林, 许庆方, 王永新, 郝鲜俊, 高文俊. 不同禾本科牧草在煤矿沉陷区的生长适应性与饲用价值比较. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(1): 64-70.

    CHANG B H, ZAHNG Y Q, ZHAI S L, XU Q F, WANG Y X, HAO X J, GAO W J. Comparison of growth adaptability and feeding value of different grasses in coal mine subsidence area. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(1): 64-70.
    [36]
    韩建国, 马春晖, 毛培胜, 牛忠联, 孙瑞臣. 播种比例和施氮量及刈割期对燕麦与豌豆混播草地产草量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 1999, 7(2): 87-94.

    HAN J G, MA C H, MAO P S, NIU Z L, SUN R C. The effects of seeding rate, nitrogen fertilizer and harvest time on the yield and quality of oat-pea mixture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1999, 7(2): 87-94.
    [37]
    孙杰, 巩林, 连露, 崔国文, 尹航, 张亚玲, 付佳琦. 海拔高度和混播比例对燕麦与箭筈豌豆产草量及质量的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698

    SUN J, GONG L, LIAN L, CUI G W, YIN H, ZHANG Y L, FU J Q. Effect of altitude and mixed-sowing ratio on forage production and quality of oat and common vetch. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698
    [38]
    孙爱华, 鲁鸿佩, 马绍慧. 高寒地区箭筈豌豆+燕麦混播复种试验研究. 草业科学, 2003, 20(8): 37-38.

    SUN A H, LU H P, MA S H. Experimental study of vetch + oat mixture system in highland region. Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(8): 37-38.

Catalog

    Article views (64) PDF downloads (24) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return