Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-5-2 Friday!
XIA H M, CAO Z J, YU M Y, LI Z, NIE C Y, ZHANG P Y, GUO H. Tolerance of 30 Kentucky bluegrass varieties to NaCl stress during the seedling stage. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(12): 3124-3137. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0713
Citation: XIA H M, CAO Z J, YU M Y, LI Z, NIE C Y, ZHANG P Y, GUO H. Tolerance of 30 Kentucky bluegrass varieties to NaCl stress during the seedling stage. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(12): 3124-3137. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0713

Tolerance of 30 Kentucky bluegrass varieties to NaCl stress during the seedling stage

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    GUO Huan E-mail: huan.guo@nwafu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: September 04, 2022
  • Accepted Date: February 20, 2023
  • Available Online: November 15, 2023
  • To explore the genetic resources of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) with strong salt tolerance, we evaluated the salt tolerance of 30 commercial Kentucky bluegrass varieties at the seedling stage. A range of growth and physiological indicators including plant height, tiller number, biomass, chlorophyll content, and leaf relative water content were determined under 400 mmol·L−1 NaCl stress. A comprehensive evaluation was carried out using principal component analysis. The results indicate that salt stress inhibited the growth of all Kentucky bluegrass varieties. Compared to the control (without salt treatment), plant height and shoot fresh weight of ‘Kentucky’ decreased by 32.62% and 18.14%, respectively, after salt treatment. ‘Blue Best’ was the most severely impacted variety, with a 71.80% reduction in shoot fresh weight and dry weight decreased by and a 53.29% reduction in shoot dry weight due to salt stress. Furthermore, the chlorophyll content of ‘Kentucky’ ‘Euromyth’ ‘Moonlight’ ‘Explorer’ and ‘Arcadia’ decreased by approximately 20% following salt treatment. ‘Blue Coat’ experienced a notable 71.40% decrease in chlorophyll content, while the total chlorophyll content of ‘Fullmoon’ decreased by 55.70%. Additionally, under salt treatment, the leaf relative water content of ‘Blue Coat’‘Fullmoon’ and ‘Merit’ decreased by more than 22% compared to the control. Based on the comprehensive evaluation scores for salt tolerance, ‘Kentucky’‘Arcadia’‘Explorer’‘Moonlight’ and ‘Euromyth’ demonstrated strong salt tolerance, whereas ‘Blue Coat’‘Fielder’‘Merit’‘Blue Best’ and ‘Fullmoon’ proved to be sensitive to salt stress.

  • [1]
    范王涛. 土壤盐碱化危害及改良方法研究. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(23): 114-116.

    FAN W T. Study on the harm of soil salinization and improvement methods. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(23): 114-116.
    [2]
    ROZEA J, FLOWERS T. Grops for a salinized world. Science, 2008, 322: 1478-1480. doi: 10.1126/science.1168572
    [3]
    毛庆莲, 王胜. 国内盐碱地治理趋势探究浅析. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(S1): 302-306.

    MAO Q L, WANG S. Brief analysis on the trend of improve saline alkali soil in China. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 59(S1): 302-306.
    [4]
    GOMES-FILHO E, LIMA C R, COSTA J H, SILVA A C, LIMA M D, LACERDA C F, PRISCO J T. Cowpea ribonuclease: properties and effect of NaCl-salinity on its activation during seed germination and seedling establishment. Plant Cell Reports, 2008, 27(1): 147-157. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0433-5
    [5]
    DINNENY J R. Traversing organizational scales in plant salt-stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 23: 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.009
    [6]
    张金林, 李惠茹, 郭姝媛, 王锁民, 施华中, 韩庆庆, 包爱科, 马清. 高等植物适应盐逆境研究进展. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 220-236.

    ZHANG J L, LI H R, GUO S Y, WANG S M, SHI H Z, HAN Q Q, BAO A K, MA Q. Research advances in higher plant adaptation to salt stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 220-236.
    [7]
    SAH S K, REDDY K R, LI J X. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 571.
    [8]
    李珊, 陈静波, 郭海林, 宗俊勤, 张芳, 褚晓晴, 蒋乔峰, 丁万文, 刘建秀. 结缕草属草坪草种质资源的耐盐性评价. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 43-51. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120406

    LI S, CHEN J B, GUO H L, ZONG J Q, ZHANG F, CHU X Q, JIANG Q F, DING W W, LIU J X. Salinity tolerance evaluation of Zoysia turfgrass germplasm. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(4): 43-51. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120406
    [9]
    FU J M, LIU B. Enhanced yield performance of transgenic cry1C* rice in saline-alkaline soil. GM Crops & Food, 2020, 11(2): 97-112.
    [10]
    梁慧敏, 夏阳, 杜峰, 张普金. 盐胁迫对两种草坪草抗性生理生化指标影响的研究. 中国草地, 2001, 23(5): 27-30.

    LIANG H M, XIA Y, DU F, ZHANG P J. Effects of NaCl stress on physiological index of two lawn grasses. Grassland of China, 2001, 23(5): 27-30.
    [11]
    BUSHMAN B S, ROBBINS M D, ROBINS J G, THORSTED K, HARRIS P, JOHNSON P G. Response to salt stress imposed on cultivars of three turfgrass species: Poa pratensis, Lolium perenne, and Puccinellia distans. Crop Science, 2020, 60: 1648-1659. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20014
    [12]
    张玉娟, 郭睿, 张兆恒, 张岩, 马晖玲, 董文科. 冷等离子体处理对草地早熟禾幼苗抗盐性的影响. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2365-2374.

    ZHANG Y J, GUO R, ZHANG Z H, ZHANG Y, MA H L, DONG W K. Effect of clod plasma treatment on salt resistance of Poa pratensis seedlings. Acta Agrestia Sinca, 2022, 30(9): 2365-2374.
    [13]
    朱慧森, 王保平, 董晓燕, 董宽虎, 李存福. 干旱及复水对山西野生草地早熟禾幼苗生长与生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7): 79-88.

    ZHU H S, WANG B P, DONG X Y, DONG K H, LI C F. Effects of drought stress and rewatering on the growth and physiological characteristics of Shanxi wild Poa pratensis seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(7): 79-88.
    [14]
    刘一明, 王兆龙. 冷季型草坪草品种(系)的耐盐性筛选. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2007, 25(4): 367-373.

    LIU Y M, WANG Z L. Screening for salinity tolerance of cool-season turfgrass varieties (selections). Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science), 2007, 25(4): 367-373.
    [15]
    BENABDERRAHIM M A, GUIZA M, HADDAD M. Genetic diversity of salt tolerance in tetraploid alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2020, 42(1): 5. doi: 10.1007/s11738-019-2993-8
    [16]
    刘燕, 杨伟, 马晖玲, 陈彦硕, 杨乾. 盐胁迫对6种草地早熟禾幼苗生理特性的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(5): 140-150.

    LIU Y, YANG W, MA H L, CHEN Y S, YANG Q. Effects of salt stress on seedling physiological characteristics of six kentucky bluegrass. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2019, 54(5): 140-150.
    [17]
    景艳霞, 袁庆华. NaCl胁迫对苜蓿幼苗生长及不同器官中盐离子分布的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 134-139.

    JING Y X, YUAN Q H. Effects of salt stress on seedling growth of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa) and ion distribution in different alfalfa organs. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 134-139.
    [18]
    王婧, 刘璐, 刘骐华, 王慧慧, 谢宇涵, 柴琦. 草地早熟禾不同品种苗期耐盐性鉴定. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(18): 36-43. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120047

    WANG J, LIU L, LIU Q H, WANG H H, XIE Y H, CHAI Q. Salt tolerance identification of kentucky bluegrass varieties at seedling stage. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(18): 36-43. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120047
    [19]
    辛承松, 董合忠, 孔祥强, 罗振. 棉花不同类型品种苗期耐盐性差异研究. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 180-185.

    XIN C S, DONG H Z, KONG X Q, LUO Z. Salt tolerant variation between different type cotton cultivars at seedling stage. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(5): 180-185.
    [20]
    于卓, 孙祥, 戴君峰, 郭文. 草地早熟禾品种间幼苗耐盐性差异的研究. 草地学报, 1997, 5(2): 128-132.

    YU Z, SUN X, DAI J F, GUO W. Studies on the salinity tolerance in seedling stage varietal differences of among five cultivaors of turf Poa pratensis. Acta Agrestia Sinca, 1997, 5(2): 128-132.
    [21]
    BAE E J, LEE K S, HUH M R, LIM C S. Silicon significantly alleviates the growth inhibitory effects of NaCl in salt-sensitive ‘Perfection’ and ‘Midnight’ kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.). Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology, 2012, 53(6): 477-483. doi: 10.1007/s13580-012-0094-3
    [22]
    殷星, 侯振安, 冶军, 闵伟, 刘凯, 王方斌, 廖欢, 甘浩天, 刘少华, 孙嘉璘. 应用多酚-叶绿素仪监测棉花氮素营养状况研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(7): 1198-1212.

    YIN X, HOU Z A, YE J, MIN W, LIU K, WANG F B, LIAO H, GAN H T, LIU S H, SUN J L. Application of polyphenol-chlorophyll meter to monitor cotton N nutrition status. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(7): 1198-1212.
    [23]
    杨文平, 王春虎, 王玉帅. 两种筋型冬小麦品种旗叶叶绿素含量和衰老生理性状比较. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(24): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.24.003

    YANG W P, WANG C H, WANG Y S. Comparison of chlorophyll content and senescence physiology of flag leaves between two gluten-type winter wheat varieties. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 38(24): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.24.003
    [24]
    董贞芬, 门宇恒, 邹秋滢, 李征明, 刘珍珍, 纪建伟. 叶绿素荧光成像在植物生长环境胁迫中的应用. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50(2): 250-256.

    DONG Z F, MEN Y H, ZOU Q Y, LI Z M, LIU Z Z, JI J W. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging in plant growth environment stress. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019, 50(2): 250-256.
    [25]
    马春艳, 王艺琳, 翟丽婷, 郭辅臣, 李长春, 牛海鹏. 冬小麦不同叶位叶片的叶绿素含量高光谱估算模型. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(6): 217-225.

    MA C Y, WANG Y L, ZHAI L T, GUO F C, LI C C, NIU H P. Hyperspectral estimation model of chlorophyll content in different leaf positions of winter wheat. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(6): 217-225.
    [26]
    刘晓静, 陈国庆, 王良, 陈玉洁, 王兰, 刘肖瑜, 李学国. 不同生育时期冬小麦叶片相对含水量高光谱监测. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(7): 854-862.

    LIU X J, CHEN G Q, WANG L, CHEN Y J, WANG L, LIU X Y, LI X G. Monitoring leaf relative water content of winter wheat based on hyperspectral index at different growth stages. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(7): 854-862.
    [27]
    陈春舟, 马占军, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊, 李葆春. 小麦种质资源抗旱耐盐性评价及种质筛选. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(14): 4820-4835.

    CHEN C Z, MA Z J, MENG Y X, MA X L, WANG H J, LI B C. Evaluation and screening of wheat germplasm resources for drought and salt tolerance. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(14): 4820-4835.
    [28]
    梁潇, 侯向阳, 王艳荣, 任卫波, 赵青山, 王照兰, 李怡, 武自念. 羊草种质资源耐盐碱性综合评价. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3): 1-9.

    LIANG X, HOU X Y, WANG Y R, REN W B, ZHAO Q S, WANG Z L, LI Y, WU Z N. Comprehensive evaluation on saline-alkali tolerance of Leymus chinensis germplasm resources. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(3): 1-9.
    [29]
    刘艳, 王宝祥, 刑运高, 陈庭木, 徐波, 杨波, 孙志广, 刘金波, 迟铭, 李建, 卢百关, 方兆伟, 秦德荣, 徐大勇. 水稻品种资源苗期耐盐性评价指标分析. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(17): 75-79.

    LIU Y, WANG B X, XING Y G, CHEN T M, XU B, YANG B, SUN Z G, LIU J B, CHI M, LI J, LU B G, FANG Z W, QIN D R, XU D Y. Analysis on evaluation index of salt tolerance of rice variety resources at seedling stage. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(17): 75-79.
    [30]
    刘一明, 程凤枝, 王齐, 胡玉咏, 王兆龙. 四种暖季型草坪植物的盐胁迫反应及其耐盐阈值. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 192-199. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20090327

    LIU Y M, CHENG F Z, WANG Q, HU Y Y, WANG Z L. Salinity stress responses and tolerance thresholds in four warm-season turfgrass. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(3): 192-199. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20090327
    [31]
    张锁科, 马晖玲. 3个草地早熟禾品种分蘖期的生理特性变化. 草原与草坪, 2014, 34(6): 74-77.

    ZHANG S K, MA H L. Study on physiological indexes and tillering ability of 3 cultivars of kentucky bluegrass. Grassland and Turf, 2014, 34(6): 74-77.
    [32]
    王英成, 芦光新, 邓晖, 蒋汉元, 姚世庭, 党宁, 李欣, 黄彩霞, 赵丽蓉, 王志慧. 基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种农艺性状评价及筛选研究. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1725-1732.

    WANG Y C, LU G X, DENG H, JIANG H Y, YAO S T, DANG N, LI X, HUANG C X, ZHAO L R, WANG Z H. Evaluation and screening of agricultural characters of silage maize varieties based on principal component analysis. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1725-1732.
    [33]
    白奕. 多指标综合评价的主成分分析模型及原理. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1998(2): 109-110.

    BAI Y. Model and theory of main-portion analysis used in comprehensive evaluation of multiple targets. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 1998(2): 109-110.
    [34]
    SAIRAM R K, VEERABHADRA R K, SRIVASTAVA G C. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science, 2002, 163(5): 1037-1046. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00278-9
    [35]
    WANG Y, NII N. Changes in chlorophyll, ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, glycine betaine content, photosynthesis and transpiration in Amaranthus tricolor leaves during salt stress. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2000, 75(6): 623-627.
    [36]
    李振华, 刘容, 张馨馨, 赵心笛, 刘敏婷, 柴琦. 外源脱落酸增强高羊茅耐盐性的作用. 北方园艺, 2022(7): 66-75.

    LI Z H, LIU R, ZHANG X X, ZHAO X D, LIU M T, CHAI Q. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on enhancing salt tolerance of Festuca arundinacea. Northern Horticulture, 2022(7): 66-75.
    [37]
    丁丁, 王红宝, 郑伶杰, 左永梅, 韩民利, 吴新海, 郭艳超. 不同品种茶菊对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(3): 692-702.

    DING D, WANG H B, ZHENG L J, ZUO Y M, HAN M L, WU X H, GUO Y C. Physiological response and comprehensive evaluation of different tea Chrysanthemun varieties under NaCl stress. Plant physiology Journal, 2021, 57(3): 692-702.
    [38]
    刘梦霜, 郭海峰, 陈观秀, 莫俊杰, 许江环, 杨善, 周鸿凯. 不同水稻品种对NaCl 胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(2): 326-336.

    LIU M S, GUO H F, CHEN G X, MO J J, XU J H, YANG S, ZHOU H K. Physiological response and salt tolerance evaluation of different rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under NaCl stress. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2023, 44(2): 326-336.
    [39]
    HODGE A, BERTA G, DOUSSAN C, MERCHAN F, CRESPI M. Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant and Soil, 2009, 321(1): 153-187.
    [40]
    李俊伟, 刘景辉, 赵宝平, 周磊, 王俊英, 郭来春, 王春龙, 任长忠. 燕麦苗期耐盐性评价及鉴定指标筛选. 吉林农业大学学报. https://doi.org/10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1623

    LI J W, LIU J H, ZHAO B P, ZHOU L, WANG J Y, GUO L C, WANG C L, REN C Z. Evaluation of salt tolerance of oat materials at seedling stage and selection of the relative index. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. https://doi.org/10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1623
    [41]
    ZHANG J, LIH, JIANG Y W, LI H B, HUANG B R. Natural variation of physiological traits molecular markers, and chlorophyll catabolic genes associated with heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass accessions. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20: 520. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02695-8
    [42]
    许盼云, 吴玉霞, 何天明. 植物对盐碱胁迫的适应机理研究进展. 中国野生植物资源, 2020, 39(10): 41-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2020.10.007

    XU P Y, WU Y X, HE T M. Research progress on adaptation mechanism of plants to saline-alkali stress. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2020, 39(10): 41-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2020.10.007
    [43]
    高建明, 夏卜贤, 袁庆华, 罗峰, 韩芸, 桂枝, 裴忠有, 孙守钧. 高粱种质材料幼苗期耐盐碱性评价. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5): 1303-1310.

    GAO J M, XIA B X, YUAN Q H, LUO F, HAN Y, GUI Z, PEI Z Y, SUN S J. Salt-alkaline tolerance of sorghum germplasm at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(5): 1303-1310.
    [44]
    田小霞, 毛培春, 孟林, 郭强. 无芒雀麦苗期耐盐指标筛选及耐盐性综合评价. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(10): 156-161.

    TIAN X X, MAO P C, MENG L, GUO Q. Determination of indicators for salt -tolerant evaluation and comprehensive evaluation of salt-tolerant at the seedlings of Bromus inermis. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(10): 156-161.

Catalog

    Article views (98) PDF downloads (33) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return