Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-5-3 Saturday!
Asitaiken·Julihaiti, DONG Y Q, ZHOU S J, NIE T T, JIANG A J, AN S Z. Effects of enclosure on vegetation diversity and niche characteristics of different grassland types in Xinjiang. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(5): 1168-1185 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0606
Citation: Asitaiken·Julihaiti, DONG Y Q, ZHOU S J, NIE T T, JIANG A J, AN S Z. Effects of enclosure on vegetation diversity and niche characteristics of different grassland types in Xinjiang. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(5): 1168-1185 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0606

Effects of enclosure on vegetation diversity and niche characteristics of different grassland types in Xinjiang

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    DONG Yiqiang E-mail: xjdyq1210@163.com

  • Received Date: July 29, 2022
  • Available Online: May 12, 2023
  • Published Date: May 14, 2023
  • To explore the response of vegetation diversity and enclosure niche, different grassland types (temperate desert, temperate steppe, and temperate montane meadow grasslands) in Xinjiang were the research object. Vegetation diversity and niche characteristics in the study sites were measured and analyzed by combining field sampling and indoor analysis. The enclosure treatment results of the different grassland types revealed that except for temperate desert grassland, most species in temperate steppe and mountain meadow grasslands showed higher niche breadth indices than grazing plots after enclosure treatment. The effect of the enclosure was more obvious in temperate steppe and mountainous meadow grasslands. Compared to freely grazing areas, temperate steppe grassland Shannon-Wiener, Patrick, Pielou, and Simpson indices increased significantly by 31.81%~90.80% (P < 0.05) after enclosure. These results indicated that enclosure treatment had the best effect in temperate steppe grassland. In conclusion, enclosure for 10 years can promote vegetation restoration of steppe and mountain meadow grasslands but inhibits vegetation restoration of desert grassland. Thus, the responses of different grassland types to fencing can differ significantly. The study findings highlight that in the governance and restoration of degraded grassland, reasonable enclosure measures should be formulated in combination with various factors, such as vegetation type and vegetation growth environment, to achieve a better enclosure effect.
  • [1]
    GRINNRLL J. The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. The Auk, 1917, 34(4): 427-433. doi: 10.2307/4072271
    [2]
    HUTCHINSON G E. Concluding remarks, cold spring harbor symposium. Quantitative Biology, 1957, 22: 239.
    [3]
    宗宁, 石培礼, 朱军涛. 高寒草地沙化过程植物群落构成及生态位特征变化. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1561-1570. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.002

    ZONG N, SHI P L, ZHU J T. Changes of plant community composition and niche characteristics during desertification process in an alpine steppe. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(8): 1561-1570. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.002
    [4]
    聂莹莹, 陈金强, 辛晓平, 徐丽君, 杨桂霞, 王旭. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原区主要植物种群生态位特征与物种多样性对封育年限响应. 草业学报, 2021, 30(10): 15-25. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021127

    NIE Y Y, CHEN J Q, XIN X P, XU L J, YANG G X, WANG X. Responses of niche characteristics and species diversity of main plant populations to duration of enclosure in the Hulun Buir meadow steppe. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 15-25. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021127
    [5]
    彭文俊, 王晓鸣. 生态位概念和内涵的发展及其在生态学中的定位. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 327-334. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.005

    PENG W J, WANG X M. Concept and connotation development of niche and its ecological orientation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 327-334. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.005
    [6]
    王国庆, 杜广明, 聂莹莹, 彭芳华, 沃强. 草甸草原封育演替过程中主要植物种群生态位动态分析. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(6): 72-78. doi: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-06-12

    WANG G Q, DU G M, NIE Y Y, PENG F H, WO Q. Niche dynamics of dominant species during restoration process of meadow steppe in enclosure. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2017, 39(6): 72-78. doi: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-06-12
    [7]
    ROSENTHAL G. Selecting target species to evaluate the success of wet grassland restoration. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 98(1/3): 227-246. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00083-5
    [8]
    JORGE S A, TOWNSEND P. Interpretation of models of ground ecological niches and species distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 2005, 2: 1-10.
    [9]
    张爱宁, 安沙舟, 张蕊思, 夏小伟, 卡斯达尔·努尔旦别克, 董磊. 不同退化梯度下大尤尔都斯高寒草原植物种群生态位特征. 草业科学, 2017, 34(2): 302-309. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0289

    ZHANG A N, AN S Z, ZHANG R S, XIA X W, Kasidaer·Nuerdanbieke, DONG L. Study on niche characteristics of the plant community in the alpine grassland of Big Youerdusi under a degeneration gradien. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(2): 302-309. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0289
    [10]
    冉圣宏, 金建君, 薛纪渝. 脆弱生态区评价的理论与方法. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(1): 117-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2002.01.017

    RAN S H, JIN J J, XUE J Y. Assessment of vulnerable ecological regions: Theory and methodology. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(1): 117-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2002.01.017
    [11]
    聂莹莹, 徐丽君, 辛晓平, 陈宝瑞, 张保辉. 围栏封育对温性草甸草原植物群落构成及生态位特征的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 11-22. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020239

    NIE Y Y, XU L J, XIN X P, CHEN B R, ZHANG B H. Effects of fence enclosure on the plant community composition and niche characteristics in a temperate meadow steppe. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 11-22. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020239
    [12]
    郭平平, 税伟, 江聪, 简小枚, 朱粟锋, 张永永, 冯洁, 陈毅萍. 退化天坑倒石坡林下优势物种生态位特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3635-3645. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.007

    GUO P P, SHUI W, JIANG C, JIAN X M, ZHU S F, ZHANG Y Y, FENG J, CHEN Y P. Niche characteristics of understory dominant species of talus slope in degraded tiankeng. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(11): 3635-3645. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.007
    [13]
    李德志, 石强, 臧润国, 王绪平, 盛丽娟, 朱志玲, 王长爱. 物种或种群生态位宽度与生态位重叠的计测模型. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7): 95-103. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.07.018

    LI D Z, SHI Q, ZANG R G, WANG X P, SHENG L J, ZHU Z L, WANG C A. Models for niche breadth and niche overlap of species or populations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(7): 95-103. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.07.018
    [14]
    孙成, 秦富仓, 包雪源, 李龙, 杨振奇, 董晓宇, 李艳. 砒砂岩区人工油松林下草本植物的生态位特征. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(3): 81-86. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.012

    SUN C, QIN F C, BAO X Y, LI L, YANG Z Q, DONG X Y, LI Y. Niche characteristics of herbaceous plants under artificial Pinus Tabuliformis forest in feldspathic sandstone region. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 81-86. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.012
    [15]
    李中林, 秦卫华, 周守标, 张纪兵, 汪贞, 王运静. 围栏封育下华北半干旱草原植物生态位研究. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1186-1193.

    LI Z L, QIN W H, ZHOU S B, ZHANG J B, WANG Z, WANG Y J. Study on plant niche under fencing measures in the semi-arid grassland of north China. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1186-1193.
    [16]
    程中秋, 张克斌, 常进, 刘建, 王黎黎. 宁夏盐池不同封育措施下的植物生态位研究. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(7): 1537-1542. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.07.005

    CHENG Z Q, ZHANG K B, CHANG J, LIU J, WANG L L. Vegetable niche of different enclosure measures in Yanchi County, Ningxia. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(7): 1537-1542. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.07.005
    [17]
    张晶晶, 许冬梅. 宁夏荒漠草原不同封育年限优势种群的生态位特征. 草地学报, 2013, 21(1): 73-78.

    ZHANG J J, XU D M. Niche characteristics of dominant plant populations in desert steppe of Ningxia with different enclosure times. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(1): 73-78.
    [18]
    陈文业, 戚登臣, 李广宇, 魏强, 王芳, 孙飞达, 刘振恒, 朱丽. 甘南高寒退化草地生态位特征及生产力研究. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1): 80-90. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.01.009

    CHEN W Y, QI D C, LI G Y, WEI Q, WANG F, SUN F D, LIU Z H, ZHU L. Study on degraded grassland niche characteristics and productivity of alpine meadow at Maqu in south of Gansu Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 80-90. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.01.009
    [19]
    阿依努尔·热哈提. 新疆地区草原退化的原因分析. 新疆畜牧业, 2017, 6: 41-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4889.2017.10.020

    Ayinuer·Rehati. Analysis on the causes of grassland degradation in Xinjiang, China. Xinjiang Xumuye, 2017, 6: 41-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4889.2017.10.020
    [20]
    赵万羽. 新疆草地资源的劣化原因及治理对策. 草业科学, 2002, 19(2): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2002.02.005

    ZHAO W Y. Deterioration, causes and control strategies of grassland resources in Xinjiang, China. Pratacultural Science, 2002, 19(2): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2002.02.005
    [21]
    董乙强. 禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠植被和土壤活性有机碳组的影响. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学硕士学位论文, 2016.

    DONG Y Q. Effects of Grazing exclusion on vegetation and soil fractions of active organic carbon of Seriphidium transiliense desert under moderate degeneration. Master Thesis, Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016.
    [22]
    ZHANG C, LIU G B, SONG Z L, WANG J, GUO L. Interactions of soil bacteria and fungi with plants during long-term grazing exclusion in semiarid grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.026
    [23]
    WANG Z, ZHANG Q, STALEY C, GAO H L, ISHII S, WEI X R, LIU J, CHENG J M, HAO M D, SADOWSKY M J. Impact of long-term grazing exclusion on soil microbial community composition and nutrient availability. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2019, 55(2): 121-134. doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-01336-5
    [24]
    DENG L, ZHANG Z N, SHANGGUAN Z P. Long-term fencing effects on plant diversity and soil properties in China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2014, 137: 7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.11.002
    [25]
    别尔达吾列提·希哈依, 董乙强, 安沙舟, 刘慧敏. 短期封育对博乐绢蒿荒漠群落特征和碳密度的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(11): 2134-2141.

    Bieerdawulieti·Xihayi, DONG Y Q, AN S Z, LIU H M. Effects of short-term non-grazing on community characteristics and carbon density in Seriphidium borotalense desert. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(11): 2134-2141.
    [26]
    刘凤婵, 李红丽, 董智, 张昊. 封育对退化草原植被恢复及土壤理化性质影响的研究进展. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(5): 116-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2012.05.019

    LIU F C, LI H L, DONG Z, ZHANG H. Advances in research on enclosure effects on vegetation restoration and soil physicochemical property of degraded grassland. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 10(5): 116-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2012.05.019
    [27]
    孙吉雄. 草地培育学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 31-35.

    SUN J X. Grassland Cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 31-35.
    [28]
    LEVINS R. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Monographs in Population Biology, 1968, 2: 1-120.
    [29]
    COLWELL R K, FUTUYMA D J. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 1971, 52(4): 567-576. doi: 10.2307/1934144
    [30]
    PIANKA E R. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 53-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
    [31]
    宋金枝, 谢开云, 赵祥, 李刚, 董宽虎, 王永新, 朱慧森. 放牧强度对晋北盐碱化草地植物经济类群的影响. 草业科学, 2013, 30(2): 223-230.

    SONG J Z, XIE K Y, ZHAO X, LI G, DONG K H, WANG Y X, ZHU H S. Effects of different grazing intensities on salinization grassland plant economic groups in northern Shanxi Province. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 30(2): 223-230.
    [32]
    赵丽娅, 钟韩珊, 赵美玉, 张劲. 围封和放牧对科尔沁沙地群落物种多样性与地上生物量的影响. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(10): 1783-1790. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.10.001

    ZHAO L Y, ZHONG H S, ZHAO M Y, ZHANG J. Effect of enclosure and grazed management on aboveground biomass and species diversity in sandy grasslands of Horqin Sandy Land, Eastern Inner Mongolia, China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(10): 1783-1790. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.10.001
    [33]
    罗久富, 周金星, 赵文霞, 董林水, 郑景明. 围栏措施对青藏高原高寒草甸群落结构和稳定性的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(3): 565-574. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0302

    LUO J F, ZHOU J X, ZHAO W X, DONG L S, ZHENG J M. Effect of fences on functional groups and stability of the alpine meadow plant community in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(3): 565-574. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0302
    [34]
    张小侠, 董乙强, 安沙舟, 李坤. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠植被特征和多样性退化演替分析. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(9): 1721-1729. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.09.019

    ZHANG X X, DONG Y Q, AN S Z, LI K. Analysis of community characteristics and plant diversity in different degraded stages of Seriphidium transillense desert. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(9): 1721-1729. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.09.019
    [35]
    杨静, 孙宗玖, 柴艳. 封育对沙质荒漠草地植被特征及稳定性影响. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(3): 65-71, 108. doi: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-03-10

    YANG J, SUN Z J, CHAI Y. Effects of enclosure on vegetation characteristics and stability of sandy desert grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2017, 39(3): 65-71, 108. doi: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-03-10
    [36]
    吴建波, 王小丹. 围封年限对藏北退化高寒草原植物群落特征和生物量的影响. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 261-266.

    WU J B, WANG X D. Effect of enclosure ages on community characters and biomass of the degraded alpine steppe at the northern Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(2): 261-266.
    [37]
    王晓, 张克斌, 王岩, 程中秋, 苏鹏飞, 顾岚. 生态位理论在天然草场群落演替及健康状况评价中的应用. 草地学报, 2011, 19(6): 904-909.

    WANG X, ZHANG K B, WANG Y, CHENG Z Q, SU P F, GU L. Application of the ecological niche theory in community succession and health evaluation of natural pasture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(6): 904-909.
    [38]
    魏斌, 陆妮, 李佳琪, 赵敏, 于应文. 封育对高寒草甸植物群落构成及生态位特征的影响. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(5): 983-991. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.05.983

    WEI B, LU N, LI J Q, ZHAO M, YU Y W. Effects of enclosure on plant community composition and niche characteristics in alpine meadow. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(5): 983-991. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.05.983
    [39]
    字洪标, 阿的鲁骥, 刘敏, 胡雷, 陈焱, 杨有芳, 王长庭. 高寒草甸不同类型草地群落特征及优势种植物生态位差异. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(4): 546-554.

    ZI H B, Adiluji, LIU M, HU L, CHEN Y, YANG Y F, WANG C T. Difference of community characteristics and niche of dominant species in different grassland types of alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2016, 22(4): 546-554.
    [40]
    原野, 赵中秋, 白中科, 王怀泉, 徐志果, 牛姝烨. 安太堡露天煤矿不同复垦模式下草本植物优势种生态位. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 3215-3222. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201612.008

    YUAN Y, ZHAO Z Q, BAI Z K, WANG H Q, XU Z G, NIU S Y. Niche characteristics of dominant herbaceous species under different land reclamation patterns in Antaibao Opencast Coal Mine. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(12): 3215-3222. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201612.008
    [41]
    冯宜明, 陈学龙, 齐瑞, 赵阳, 侯亚丽, 闫倩倩, 李社勤, 徐德才. 甘肃亚高山云杉人工林下植物种群生态位特征. 草业科学, 2018, 35(4): 807-815. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0236

    FENG Y M, CHEN X L, QI R, ZHAO Y, HOU Y L, YAN Q Q, LI S Q, XU D C. Niche characteristics of the primary understory populations of a Piceaasperata plantation in the subalpine region of Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(4): 807-815. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0236
    [42]
    刘润红, 陈乐, 涂洪润, 梁士楚, 姜勇, 李月娟, 黄冬柳, 农娟丽. 桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 2057-2071.

    LIU R H, CHEN L, TU H R, LIANG S C, JIANG Y, LI Y J, HUANG D L, NONG J L. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in karst hills of Guilin, southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 2057-2071.
    [43]
    尹才佳, 马龙, 朱大海, 邹书珍, 康迪. 地震滑坡体自然恢复后次生植物群落物种组成及生态位特征. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1525-1534. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202208.010

    YIN C J, MA L, ZHU D H, ZOU S Z, KANG D. Species composition and niche characteristics of secondary plant communities on regenerated landslides after earthquake. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(8): 1525-1534. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202208.010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 王益涛,刘建康,武志嘉,张博华,兰慧琴,黄祥祥. 围封对荒漠草原典型植物群落特征及多样性的影响. 水土保持研究. 2025(01): 121-130+140 .
    2. 王守兴,周华坤,欧立鹏,李成先,王雁鹤,宁晓春,谷强,魏代军,杨明新. 三江源不同草地类型植被及土壤微生物多样性与土壤因子特征的研究. 草业学报. 2025(04): 16-26 .
    3. 文霞,李世平,邵权,郑竹,杨子姗. 云南山地牧业草地资源特点与利用. 养殖与饲料. 2024(08): 1-7 .
    4. 黎松松,王宏洋. 哈密市荒漠草地植物多样性及其生态位特征分析. 草食家畜. 2024(05): 44-50+64 .
    5. 曹尘,何政,姜倪皓. 红河州老阴山林下草本层群落结构与环境关联. 南方林业科学. 2023(06): 33-38+78 .
    6. 袁明龙,王玉祥,张博,蒋平安. 新疆草原生态保护与草业高质量发展. 草业科学. 2023(05): 1135-1139 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (837) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(7)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return