Effect of mixed sowing of <i>Dolichos lablab</i> and <i>Sorghum dochna</i> on mixed forage silage quality

NI Wang; WANG Bin; WANG Tengfei; QIU Xuefeng; LI Manyou; FENG Qin; LAN Jian

doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0133

Pratacultural Science > 2022 > 39(8): 1628-1635. > DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0133

NI W, WANG B, WANG T F, QIU X F, LI M Y, FENG Q, LAN J. Effect of mixed sowing of and on mixed forage silage quality. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(8): 1628-1635 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0133

Citation:

PDF (1055 KB)

Effect of mixed sowing of Dolichos lablab and Sorghum dochna on mixed forage silage quality

NI Wang^1,2,,
WANG Bin^1,2,
WANG Tengfei^1,2,
QIU Xuefeng³,
LI Manyou^1,2,
FENG Qin^1,2,
LAN Jian^1,2, ,

1.
College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
2.
Ningxia Grassland and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
3.
Ningxia Huifeng Agricultural Products Limited Company, Guyuan 756000, Ningxia, China

More Information

Corresponding author:
LAN Jian　E-mail: ndlanjian@163.com
Received Date: March 02, 2022
Available Online: June 06, 2022
Published Date: August 14, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of different sowing rates of Dolichos lablab and Sorghum dochna on the quality of mixed forage silage, the silage (S₀) sown with S. dochna alone (sowing rate of 22.5 kg·ha⁻¹) and that with S. dochna and D. lablab (different sowing rates of 22.5, 45.0, 67.5, and 90.0 kg·ha⁻¹ for S₁, S₂, S₃, and S₄, respectively) were analyzed.” Nutritional components and fermentation quality were determined after 60 days of fermentation at room temperature (about 25 ℃). The results showed that the fresh and dry grass yields of S. dochna monoculture were the highest at 75.61 and 23.04 t·ha⁻¹, respectively. In the mixed-seeding treatment group, the neutral and acid detergent fiber contents in the mixed forage decreased significantly, while the crude protein content increased significantly (P < 0.05). The crude protein content of the mixed sowing silages was significantly higher than that of the S. dochna silage, and the contents of water-soluble carbohydrates, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were significantly lower than that of S. dochna silage (P < 0.05). Compared with S₀ treatment, S₂ treatment significantly increased lactic acid content and decreased acetic acid and butyric acid contents (P < 0.05). Based on the fresh hay yield, nutritional components, and fermentation quality of silage, the mixed silage of 45.0 kg·ha⁻¹ D. lablab and 22.5 kg·ha⁻¹ S. dochna was the most suitable for silage modulation. This study may provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the silage of soybean-grass mixtures in Ningxia.
- Sorghum dochna,
- Dolichos lablab,
- sowing rate,
- silage quality

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	渠晖, 沈益新. 甜高粱用作青贮作物的潜力评价. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 808-812. QU H, SHEN Y X. Evaluation the potential of sweet sorghum grown for silage crop. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 808-812.
[2]	孙志强, 罗撄宁, 熊乙, 高润, 吴哲, 玉柱. 甜高粱作为优质饲草在我国草牧业发展中的潜力分析. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(3): 104-112. SUN Z Q, LUO Y N, XIONG Y, GAO R, WU Z, YU Z. Evaluation of sweet sorghum as a high-quality forage in pasture-livestock industry development. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(3): 104-112.
[3]	KIMANI E, MATASYOH J, KINYUA M, WACHIRA F N. Characterisation of volatile compounds and flavour attributes of Lablab purpureus bean accessions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2019, 18(24): 518-530. doi: 10.5897/AJB2017.15993
[4]	杨帆, 刘卓, 韩旭彪, 李剑, 时兴伟, 兰剑. 宁夏雨养区拉巴豆与甜高粱混播对草地产量和牧草品质的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5): 24-30. YANG F, LIU Z, HAN X B, LI J, SHI X W, LAN J. Effects of mixed planting of Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet and Sorghum dochna (Forssk.) Snowden on grassland yield and quality of forage grass in Ningxia rain fed region. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(5): 24-30.
[5]	喻佳媛. 拉巴豆与几种禾草混合青贮效果的研究. 长沙: 湖南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2015. YU J Y. Study on mixed silage of Dolichos lablab with different gramineae. Master Thesis. Changsha: Hu’nan Agricultural University, 2015.
[6]	罗登, 梁欢, 曾兵, 王胤晨. 大力士甜高粱和拉巴豆混合青贮对青贮品质的影响. //第八届中国牛业发展大会论文集. 乌鲁木齐: 中国畜牧业协会, 2013: 493-497. LUO D, LIANG H, ZENG B, WANG Y C. Effects of the mixture of Sorghum bicolor and Dolichos lablab on silage quality. //The 8th china cattle industry development conference. Urumqi: China Animal Husbandry Association, 2013: 493-497.
[7]	PARRA C S, BOLSON D C, JACOVACI F A, NUSSIO L G, DANIEL J L P. Influence of soybean-crop proportion on the conservation of maize-soybean bi-crop silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 257: 114295. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114295
[8]	刘美华. 青贮玉米与拉巴豆混播营养价值及青贮品质研究. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学硕士学位论文, 2014. LIU M H. The research on nutritional and silage value of Intercropping corn with lablab bean. Master Thesis. Alaer: Tarim University, 2014.
[9]	张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007: 48-171. ZHANG L Y. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Testing Technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007: 48-171.
[10]	BRODERICK G A, KANG J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1): 64-75. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
[11]	许庆方, 玉柱, 韩建国, 白春生, 薛艳林, 荀桂荣. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸. 草原与草坪, 2007(2): 63-65, 67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2007.02.017 XU Q F, YU Z, HAN J G, BAI C S, XUE Y L, XUN G R. Determining organic acid of alfalfa silage by HPLC. Grassland and Turf, 2007(2): 63-65, 67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2007.02.017
[12]	高海娟, 柴凤久, 刘泽东, 尤海洋. 应用V-Score体系评价不同含水量苜蓿青贮饲料品质. 中国饲料, 2016(12): 16-18. GAO H J, CHAI F J, LIU Z D, YOU H Y. The evaluation for alfalfa silage quality with different water content of V-Score system. China Feed, 2016(12): 16-18.
[13]	安昊云, 王皓, 贾倩民, 常生华, Shahzad Ali, 刘永杰, 张程, 侯扶江. 禾豆混播与调亏灌溉对河西地区饲草产量、品质和水分利用的影响. 草业科学, 2021, 38(1): 122-135. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0301 AN H Y, WANG H, JIA Q M, CHANG S H, SHAHZAD A, LIU Y J, ZHANG C, HOU F J. Effects of gramineae-legume mixed sowing and deficit irrigation on yield, quality and water use of forage grass in Hexi region. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(1): 122-135. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0301
[14]	王斌, 董秀, 李满有, 杨雨琦, 兰剑. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 828-834. WANG B, DONG X, LI M Y, YANG Y Q, LAN J. Effects of mixed planting of Dolichos Lablab with different sowing rates and silage corn on grassland productivity and forage Quality. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[15]	HU D, LI R, ZHANG J, ZHAO B, DONG S. Mixed cropping of different hybrids of maize optimizes canopy structure and promotes higher grain yield. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(6): 2692-2702. doi: 10.2134/agronj2019.01.0047
[16]	FERREIRA G, ALFONSO M, DEPINO S, ALESSANDRI E. Effect of planting density on nutritional quality of green-chopped corn for silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(9): 5918-5921. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8094
[17]	马春晖, 韩建国. 一年生饲用作物最佳刈割期的研究. 草业科学, 2001(3): 25-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2001.03.008 MA C H, HAN J G. A study on the optimal harvest time of annual forage crops. Pratacultural Science, 2001(3): 25-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2001.03.008
[18]	史志强, 裴亚斌, 徐强, 刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘南高寒牧区甘农2号小黑麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果. 草业科学, 2021, 38(9): 1771-1781. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0475 SHI Z Q, PEI Y B, XU Q, LIU H C, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on the mixed effect of triticale variety Gannong No. 2 and vetch in alpine pastures of Gannan. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(9): 1771-1781. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0475
[19]	顾啟超, 张洁, 周晓康, 郑一民, 邹彩霞. 全株甘蔗(甘蔗尾)茎叶混合比例对其青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(4): 2557-2574. GU Q C, ZHANG J, ZHOU X K, ZHENG Y M, ZOU C X. Effects of mixing ratio of stems and leaves of whole sugarcane (sugarcane tops) on silage quality and aerobic stability. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(4): 2557-2574.
[20]	BAGHDADI A, ABDHALIM M R, OTHMAN R, MARTINI M R, MAHDI E. Fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of corn silage intercropped with soybean under different crop combination ratios. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2016, 26(6): 1710-1717.
[21]	ZENG T R, LI X L, GUAN H, YANG W Y, LIU W G, LIU J, DU Z C, LI X M, XIAO Q Y, WANG X C, ZHANG X Q, HUANG L K, XAING Q J, PENG Q H, YAN Y H. Dynamic microbial diversity and fermentation quality of the mixed silage of corn and soybean grown in strip intercropping system. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 313: 123655.
[22]	邝肖, 季婧, 梁文学, 崔国文, 冀国旭, 崔新, 刘建, 胡国富. 北方寒区紫花苜蓿/无芒雀麦混播比例和刈割时期对青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(12): 187-198. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018027 KUANG X, JI J, LIANG W X, CUI G W, JI G X, CUI X, LIU J, HU G F. Effects of mixed sowing ratio and mowing period of Medicago sativa and Bromus inermis on silage quality in cold regions of north China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 187-198. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018027
[23]	毕于运. 秸秆资源评价与利用研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院博士学位论文, 2010. BI Y Y. Study on straw resources evaluation and utilization. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2010.
[24]	JONES B A, HATFIELD R D, MUCK R E. Effect of fermentation and bacterial inoculation on lucerne cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 60(2): 147-153.
[25]	刘晶晶, 高丽娟, 师建芳, 王小芬, 袁旭峰, 崔宗均. 乳酸菌复合系和植物乳杆菌提高柳枝稷青贮效果. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9): 295-302. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.09.044 LIU J J, GAO L J, SHI J F, WANG X F, YUAN X F, CUI J Y. Lactic acid bacteria community andLactobacillus plantarum improving silaging effect of switchgrass. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(9): 295-302. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.09.044
[26]	ANIL L, PHIPPS R H. The potential of forage–maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2000, 86(3): 157-164.
[27]	OGUNADE I M, KIM D H, JIANG Y, WEINBERG Z G, JEONG K C, ADESOGAN A T. Effects of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 101(3): 2048-2059.
[28]	ALOBA T A, COREA E E, MENDOZA M, MENDOZA M, DICKHOEFER U, CASTRO-MONTOYA C. Effects of ensiling length and storage temperature on the nutritive value and fibre-bound protein of three tropical legumes ensiled alone or combined with sorghum. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2022, 283: 115172. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115172
[29]	张欢, 雷晓青, 朱鸿福, 林语梵, 董文成, 张桂杰. 宁夏黄灌区紫花苜蓿与高丹草适宜混贮比例研究. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(5): 136-142. ZHANG H, LEI X Q, ZHU H F, LIN Y F, DONG W C, ZAHNG G J. Study on quality of mixed silage of alfalfa and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid silage in yellow river irrigation region of Ningxia. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(5): 136-142.
[30]	NI K K, ZHAO J Y, ZHU B, SU R, PAN Y, MA J K, ZHOU G A, TAO Y, LIU X R, ZHONG J. Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 265: 563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	吕长鹏. 不同种植模式对甜高粱产量和品质的影响. 现代畜牧兽医. 2024(06): 15-18 .
2.	甘丽，李海萍，汪辉，陈有军，陈仕勇，蒋永梅，张珈敏，梁骥，关皓，周青平. 生育期和混播比例对四川冬闲田燕麦/箭筈豌豆混合青贮品质的影响. 草地学报. 2023(06): 1867-1877 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (612) PDF downloads (30) Cited by(7)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effect of mixed sowing of Dolichos lablab and Sorghum dochna on mixed forage silage quality

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content