Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-5-2 Friday!
HUO J H, FANG S P, WU P S, ZHONG X J, ZHAN J S. Effects of diets with different concentration-roughage ratios on the microbial community structure of goat rumen. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(12): 2558-2566 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0303
Citation: HUO J H, FANG S P, WU P S, ZHONG X J, ZHAN J S. Effects of diets with different concentration-roughage ratios on the microbial community structure of goat rumen. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(12): 2558-2566 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0303

Effects of diets with different concentration-roughage ratios on the microbial community structure of Nubian goat rumen

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    ZHAN Jinshun E-mail: zhanjinshun1985@163.com

  • Received Date: June 04, 2020
  • Accepted Date: August 05, 2020
  • Available Online: November 09, 2020
  • Published Date: December 14, 2020
  • The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of diets with different concentration-roughage ratios on the microbial community structure of Nubian goat rumen. Thirty-six healthy Nubian ewes with similar body weights were randomly divided into three groups, with 12 goats per group. Goats in each group were fed total mixed rations with concentration-roughage ratios of 40∶60 (L), 50∶50 (M), or 60∶40 (H). The experimental period was 70 days. The results were as follows: 1) A total of 1901 OTUs were generated, of which 1348 OTUs were shared by the three groups, accounting for 70.91% of the total. The number of OTUs was significantly higher in group L than in group H (P < 0.05). The number of OTUs decreased with the increasing dietary concentration-roughage ratios. 2) The Chao and Ace indexes declined with increasing dietary concentration-roughage ratios. The Ace index was significantly higher in group L than in group H (P < 0.05). The Shannon and Simpson indexes showed no significant differences between the groups. 3) According to cluster analysis, the structure of the rumen microbial community was relatively close in groups L and H. 4) At the phylum level, the relative abundances of Elusimicrobia, Lentisphaerae, TM7, Cyanobacteria, and Spirochaetes were significantly higher in group L than group H (P < 0.05), but the relative abundance of Euryarchaeota had the opposite result. The relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia were significantly higher in group L than group M (P < 0.05). 5) At the genus level, the relative abundances of vadinCA11 and Sphaerochaeta were significantly higher in group L than group H (P < 0.05), but the relative abundances of Selenomonas and Methanimicrococcus had the opposite result. 6) At the species level, the relative abundances of Desulfovibrio D168, Ruminococcus albus, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Prevotella ruminicola were significantly higher in group M than group H (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05), but the relative abundances of Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes had the opposite result. In conclusion, the diets with different concentration-roughage ratios influenced the microbial community structure of goat rumen, which then affected nutrient digestion and absorption.
  • [1]
    王尧悦. 日粮营养水平对滩羊瘤胃细菌区系及pH和VFA的影响. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2017.

    WANG Y Y. Effects of dietary nutrient levels on the bacterial flora, pH and VFA levels in rumen of Tan sheep. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017.
    [2]
    LIU J H, BIAN G R, ZHU W Y, MAO S Y. High-grain feeding causes strong shifts in ruminal epithelial bacterial community and expression of Toll-like receptor genes in goats. Fortiers in Microbiology, 2015, 6: 167.
    [3]
    MAO S Y, HUO W J, ZHU W Y. Microbiome-metabolome analysis reveals unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of rumial microbiota with increasing dietary grain in a goat model. Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 18(2): 525-541.
    [4]
    胡丹丹. 不同精粗比日粮下奶牛瘤胃发酵与菌群结构及血清生化指标变化的研究. 银川: 宁夏大学硕士学位论文, 2019.

    HU D D. Studuy the changes of rumen fermentation, flora structure and serum biochemical parameters on dairy cows with different rations of concentrate and roughage. Master Thesis. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2019.
    [5]
    ROMERO-PÉREZ G A, OMINSKI K H, MCALLISTER T A, KRAUSE D O. Effect of environmental factors and influence of rumen and hindgut biogeography on bacterial communities in steers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(1): 258-268. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01289-09
    [6]
    HIGHLANDER S K. High throughput sequencing methods for microbiome profiling: Application to food animal systems. Animal Health Research Reviews, 2012, 13(1): 40-53. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000126
    [7]
    占今舜, 邬彩霞, 刘明美, 苏效双, 詹康, 赵国琦. 饲粮添加苜蓿黄酮对奶牛瘤胃菌群的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 82-89. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2016358

    ZHAN J S, WU C X, LIU M M, SU X S, ZHAN K, ZHAO G Q. Effects of alfalfa flavonoids as dietary additives on bacterial flora in the rumen of dairy cows. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 82-89. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2016358
    [8]
    尹福泉, 吴征敏, 王志敬, 吴浩浩, Aamir Nawab, 庄桂锋, 钟耿杰, 黄昇. 不同精粗比饲粮对雷州山羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃微生物多样性的影响. 广东海洋大学学报, 2018, 38(1): 80-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2018.01.011

    YIN F Q, WU Z M, WANG Z J, WU H H, NAWAB A, ZHUANG G F, ZHONG G J, HUANG S. Effects of different concentrate to forage ratio on growth performance, blood biochemistry and rumen microbial diversity of Leizhou goats. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2018, 38(1): 80-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2018.01.011
    [9]
    叶明, 张爱忠, 姜宁, 李美鑫, 陈勇. NDF/NFC对反刍动物瘤胃微生物及发酵参数的调控作用. 饲料研究, 2015, 22: 4-9.

    YE M, ZHANG A Z, JIANG N, LI M X, CHEN Y. Effects of NDF to NFC ratio on microorganisms and fermentation parameters of rumen in ruminants. Feed Research, 2015, 22: 4-9.
    [10]
    SINGH K M, AHIR V B, TRIPATILI A K, RAMANI U, SAJNANI M, KORINGA P, JAKHESARA S, PANDYA P, RANK D, MURTY D, KOTHARI R, JOSHI C. Metagenomic analysis of surti buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) rumen: A preliminary study. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39(4): 4841-4848. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0
    [11]
    CHITTORA D, MEENA M, BARUPAL T, SWAPNIL P, SHARMA K. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 2020, 22: 100737. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100737
    [12]
    SHIN N R, WHON T W, BAE J W. Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends in Biotechnology, 2015, 33(9): 496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011
    [13]
    徐晓锋, 胡丹丹, 郭婷婷, 张力莉. 不同精粗比饲粮条件下奶牛瘤胃细菌菌群结构变化的研究. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(12): 5541-5550. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.020

    XU X F, HU D D, GUO T T, ZHANG L L. Structure changes of rumen bacterial flora of dairy cows under different concentrate to roughage ratio diets. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(12): 5541-5550. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.020
    [14]
    王勇胜, 李妍, 曹玉凤, 李秋凤, 薄文喜, 高艳霞, 李建国. 饲粮中全棉籽比例对育肥荷斯坦公牛瘤胃发酵与微生物区系、甲烷排放及肝脏碳代谢相关基因表达的影响. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(6): 2701-2715.

    WANG Y S, LI Y, CAO Y F, LI Q F, BO W X, GAO Y X, LI J G. Effects of dietary whole cottonseed ratio on rumen fermentation and microflora, methane emission and expression of genes related to carbon metabolism in liver of fattening holstein bulls. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(6): 2701-2715.
    [15]
    潘晓花, 王梦芝, 付聪, 王洪荣. 饲粮精粗比和添加硫胺素对奶牛体外瘤胃发酵参数及菌群结构的影响. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(1): 88-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.01.012

    PAN X H, WANG M Z, FU C, WANG H R. Effects of dietary concentrate to forage ratio and thiamine supplementation on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and microbial community structure in dairy cows. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013, 25(1): 88-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.01.012
    [16]
    FERNANDO S C, PURVIS Ⅱ H T, NAJAR F Z, SUKHARNIKOV L O, KREHBIELC R, NAGARAJA T G, ROE B A, DESILVA U. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(22): 7482-7490. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00388-10
    [17]
    SINGH K M, PANDYA P R, TRIPATHI A K, PATEL G R, PARNERKAR S, KOTHARI R K, JOSHI C G. Study of rumen metagenome community using qPCR under different diets. Meta Gene, 2014, 2: 191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.01.001
    [18]
    王洪荣. 反刍动物瘤胃酸中毒机制解析及其营养调控措施. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(10): 3140-3148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.10.028

    WANG H R. Mechanism analysis and nutritional strategies for prevention of sub-acute ruminal acidosis in ruminants. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(10): 3140-3148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.10.028
    [19]
    张瑞阳. 组学技术研究亚急性瘤胃酸中毒对奶牛瘤胃微生物、代谢和上皮功能的影响. 南京: 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 2015.

    ZHANG R Y. Omics-based approaches to assess the effects of subacute ruminal acidosis on rumen microbiota, metabolism and epithelial function in dairy cows. PhD Thesis. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015.
    [20]
    JAMI E, MIZRAHI I. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e33306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033306
    [21]
    STEVENSON D M, WEIMER P J. Dominance of Prevotella and low adundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 75(1): 165-174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0802-y
    [22]
    王尧悦, 赵钊艳, 王兴涛, 陈玉林, 杨雨鑫. 日粮营养水平对150~180日龄滩羊瘤胃相关微生物菌群数量、pH和VFA含量的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(10): 2060-2070. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.10.015

    WANG Y Y, ZHAO Z Y, WANG X T, CHEN Y L, YANG Y X. Effect of dietary nutrient levels on the number of related microbes, pH and VFA levels in rumen of Tan sheep aged from 150 to 180 days. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016, 47(10): 2060-2070. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.10.015
    [23]
    冯仰廉. 反刍动物营养学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.

    FENG Y L. Ruminants Nutrition. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
    [24]
    KOIKE S, KOBAYASHI Y. Fibrolytic rumen bacteria:Their ecology and functions. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009, 22(1): 131-138. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2009.r.01
    [25]
    杨宏波, 刘红, 占今舜, 林淼, 赵国琦. 不同精粗比颗粒饲料对断奶公犊牛瘤胃发酵参数和微生物的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 131-138. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015022

    YANG H B, LIU H, ZHAN J S, LIN M, ZHAO G Q. Effects of diet pellets with different concentrate-roughage ratios on rumen fermentation parameters and microorganism abundance in weaned bull calves. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 131-138. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015022
    [26]
    李萍, 梁辛, 韦升菊, 杨承剑, 李丽莉, 梁贤威, 邹彩霞, 夏中生. 饲粮精粗比对后备母水牛瘤胃发酵参数和纤维降解菌数的影响. 畜牧与兽医, 2015, 47(7): 36-40.

    LI P, LIANG X, WEI S J, YANG C J, LI L L, LIANG X W, ZOU C X, XIA Z S. Effects of dietaryconcentrate-roughage ratios on fermentation parameters and number of fiber degrading bacteria in rumen of female buffalo. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 47(7): 36-40.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 赵晓静,刘嫣然,李晓辉,张峰,高艳霞,左晓磊,王晓芳,何团拥,孙凤莉,张建设,申栋. 不同粗料组成对泌乳中后期奶牛瘤胃菌群与瘤胃发酵参数的影响. 中国饲料. 2024(01): 93-99+107 .
    2. 董佳强,马志刚,霍明东,王志强,黄宇翔,邹跃,郭文凯,吕明哲,张红,杨昊天,杨坤,魏念冬,周景明,韩永胜,江波涛,陈志峰. 基于16S rDNA高通量测序技术分析限制基础饲粮补饲水培大麦苗对籽鹅肠道菌群的影响. 中国畜牧兽医. 2024(05): 1921-1930 .
    3. 申迪,曾子铭,庞凯悦,柴沙驼,聂洪辛,李毓敏,廖扬,王迅,黄伟华,刘书杰,杨英魁,王书祥. 低精料日粮和高精料日粮对牦牛生长性能和瘤胃菌群结构的影响. 草业学报. 2024(05): 155-165 .
    4. 王超,田丰,李九月,李长青,王利,张海鹰,薛树媛. 发酵沙柳对西门塔尔后备母牛瘤胃发酵参数及微生物多样性的影响. 饲料工业. 2023(15): 43-48 .
    5. 李毓敏,聂洪辛,庞凯悦,柴沙驼,曾子铭,刘书杰,杨英魁,王书祥. 牦牛日粮精粗比转换对瘤胃微生物菌群的影响. 饲料研究. 2023(20): 7-12 .
    6. 张晓庆,金艳梅,尹凤旭,张继泽,王梓凡,潘强. 荨麻草块饲粮对藏系绵羊瘤胃细菌群落结构、发酵参数及生长性能的影响. 动物营养学报. 2022(03): 1683-1693 .
    7. 杨德智,王晨,侯明杰,王虎成. 饲用甜高粱和全株玉米青贮对肉羊前胃微生态的影响. 草业学报. 2022(04): 145-154 .
    8. 于杰,王谊鹃. 饲粮精粗比对反刍动物生产和经济效益的影响. 饲料研究. 2021(09): 156-159 .
    9. 朱保一. 肉羊生态饲料研究及其对经济效益的影响. 饲料研究. 2021(14): 157-160 .
    10. 卜振鲲,都帅,王志军,降晓伟,刘庭玉,格根图,贾玉山. 日粮精粗比对乌珠穆沁羊生长、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响. 草原与草业. 2021(03): 51-57 .
    11. 王书祥,戴东文,杨英魁,王迅,柴沙驼. 补饲精料对冷季放牧牦牛生长性能、瘤胃发酵及菌群结构的影响. 动物营养学报. 2021(11): 6266-6276 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (2741) PDF downloads (41) Cited by(12)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return