Influence of the production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in different ecological condition of Guizhou Province

Qiong Mou; Jia-hai Wu; Shao-qing Wang; Jing Wu; Li Zhong

doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0715

Pratacultural Science > 2016 > 10(8): 1583-1588. > DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0715

Qiong Mou, Jia-hai Wu, Shao-qing Wang, Jing Wu, Li Zhong. Influence of the production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in different ecological condition of Guizhou Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 10(8): 1583-1588. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0715

Citation:

PDF (1285 KB)

Influence of the production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in different ecological condition of Guizhou Province

Qiong Mou^1,2,3,
Jia-hai Wu^1,4,3,
Shao-qing Wang⁵,
Jing Wu^1,2,3,
Li Zhong⁶

1.
1. Guizhou Prataculture Institute, Guiyang 550006, china
2.
2. Guizhou Technical and Testing Extension Station of Pasture, Dushan 558200,china
3.
4.
2. Department of Animal Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China
5.
Department of Animal Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China
6.
Guizhou Prataculture Institute, Guiyang 550006, china

More Information

Received Date: December 21, 2015
Published Date: August 19, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to explore the effect of different ecological conditions on production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in Guizhou, the difference of production, varieties resistance and nutritional quality between Qiancao No. 5 and F. arundinacea cv. Johnston were studied in five different ecological conditions of Guizhou for two consecutive years. The results showed that: 1) With the altitude increasing, the yield of Qiancao No.5 and Johnston showed a trend of decrease among 5 pilots, especially in Weining pilot that has the highest altitude were (highly) significant lower than the other pilots. And the yield performance of Qiancao No.5 and Johnston were better in Dushan and Guiyang pilots where altitude are relatively low. 2)The yield of Qiancao No. 5 were extremely significant (P<0.01) higher than that of Johnston in each pilot. Thus, the production performance of Qiancao No.5 were better than that of Johnston. 3)The comprehensive resistance of Qiancao No.5 was better than Johnston, and whose EE content was extremely significant (P<0.01) higher than that of Johnston on the nutritional quality. Therefore, Qiancao No.5 was worth promoting production in theory because of its higher production performance, better comprehensive resistance and nutritional value than those of Johnston.
- Guizhou,
- Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5,
- production performance,
- resistance,
- nutritional quality

FullText(HTML)

References (29)

References

[1]	云锦凤.牧草及饲料作物育种学.北京:中国农业出版社,2001:1-6,9-41,147-149,173-191.
[1]	Yun J F.Forage and Fodder Crop Breeding.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2001:1-6,9-41,147-149,173-191.(in Chinese)
[2]	Yu L Q,Yun J F.Research progress of forage breeding in China.Grassland of China,2005,27(3):61-63.(in Chinese)
[2]	于林清,云锦凤.中国牧草育种研究进展.中国草地,2005,27(3):61-63.
[3]	孙美红,刘霞.中国牧草育种工作研究进展.中国农学通报,2006,22(7):23-26.
[3]	Sun M H,Liu X.Progress in grass breeding in China.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2006,22(7):23-26.(in Chinese)
[4]	Wu J H,Mou Q,Tang C B,Shang Y S,Mo B T,Wa Q R.Breeding of Qiancao No.1,a new Festuca arundinacea variety.Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2006,34(4):75-78.(in Chinese)
[4]	吴佳海,牟琼,唐成斌,尚以顺,莫本田,瓦庆荣.牧草新品种黔草1号高羊茅的选育.贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):75-78.
[5]	Mou Q,Wu J H,Wang X L,Zhong L,Liu X X.Yield and resistance of new tall fescue strains in the Guizhou Province.Pratacultural Science,2011(4):603-606.(in Chinese)
[5]	牟琼,吴佳海,王小利,钟理,刘晓霞.贵州高羊茅新品种(系)比较试验.草业科学,2011(4):603-606.
[6]	Ren J Z.Research Methods of Pratacultural Science.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,1998:70-322.(in Chinese)
[6]	任继周.草业科学研究方法.北京:中国农业科学出版社,1998:70-322.
[7]	Zhang L Y.Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Detection Technology.Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2003:46-55.(in Chinese)
[7]	胡林.如何用九分制对草坪进行评分.园林,1998(3):44-45.
[8]	Ma X F,Chen S Y,Deng J,Feng Q S,Huang X D.Vegetation phenology dynamics and its response to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(1):13-21.(in Chinese)
[8]	张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2003:46-55.
[9]	Zhang J H,Han Q F,Jia Z K,Cizhu.Comparative study on growth characteristics of six alfalfa varieties at different altitudes.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science,2007,35(16):4792-4793,4836.(in Chinese)
[9]	马晓芳,陈思宇,邓婕,冯琦胜,黄晓东.青藏高原植被物候监测及其对气候变化的响应.草业学报,2016,25(1):13-21.
[10]	张建华,韩清芳,贾志宽,次珠.不同海拔条件下6种紫花苜蓿品种的生长特性比较研究.安徽农业科学,2007,35(16):4792-4793,4836.
[10]	Zhang X R,Huo S P,Li Q W,Yan Q J,Zhang J,Yu Z J,Xiang Z F,Zhang F K,Peng F M.Effect of altitude height on growing period and yield of maize in Wuling Mountain area.Journal of Maize Science,2006,14(3):99-101,106.(in Chinese)
[11]	张兴瑞,霍仕平,李求文,晏庆九,张健,余志江,向振凡,张芳魁,彭方明.海拔高度对武陵山区玉米品种生育期和产量的影响.玉米科学,2006,14(3):99-101,106.
[11]	Zhang R W.Determination of the yield and nutritional component contents in Victoria alfalfa from different altitude area of Guiyang.Guizhou Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,2009,33(2):5-7.(in Chinese)
[12]	Li C X,Feng H S.A study on the adaptability of sweet sorghum planted in different altitudinal areas of the Qinghai plateau.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2013,22(3):51-59.(in Chinese)
[12]	张瑞文.维多利亚紫花苜蓿在贵阳不同海拔地区的产量与营养成分含量研究.贵州畜牧兽医,2009,33(2):5-7.
[13]	李春喜,冯海生.甜高粱在青海高原不同海拔生态区的适应性研究.草业学报,2013,22(3):51-59.
[13]	Cao Z H,Hu T M,Cao S H,Zhang Z Y.Nutritive value evaluation of six wild forages growing in Shannan Areas of Tibet.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2010,18(3):414-420.(in Chinese)
[14]	曹仲华,呼天明,曹社会,张中岳.西藏山南地区6种野生牧草营养价值评定.草地学报,2010,18(3):414-420.
[14]	Leng J,Zhang Y,Zhu R J,Yang S L,Gou X,Mao H M.Studies on rumen degradabilities of six forages in Yunnan yellow cattle.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2011,27(1):398-402.(in Chinese)
[15]	冷静,张颖,朱仁俊,杨舒黎,苟潇,毛华明.云南黄牛对6种牧草瘤胃降解规律的研究.中国农学通报,2011,27(1):398-402.

[1]	WANG Huning, QIN Weina, JIAO Ting, SHI Shangli, LI Shuyan, GAO Yongquan, QI Shuai. Evaluation of milk yield, agronomic traits, and nutritional quality of different green-feeding maize varieties in Gansu Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(6): 1617-1628. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0750
[2]	SONG Wenxue, HUANG Wei, WANG Xucheng, WANG Qin, WANG Xing, WANG Jing, GAO Xueqin, FU Bingzhe. Evaluation of Roegneria kamoji production performance and nutritional quality[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(3): 752-760. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0160
[3]	HUANG Wei, CHANG Wei, YU Shuyan, LI Xiaoyun, GAO Xueqin, FU Bingzhe. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 16 Bromus inermis germplasm resources[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(11): 2237-2246. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0246
[4]	LI Xiang, ZHANG Yemeng, ZHU Lili, YANG Xuegui, LI Wenjun, WANG Yuanlan, XU Huijun, QI qi, CHEN Zhiguo. Evaluation of silage performance and nutritional quality of different corn cultivars in Qinghai Plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(6): 1194-1208. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0726
[5]	HE Zhenfu, HE Chungui, CHEN Ping, WANG Fei. Comparative study on the yield and nutritional quality of different sweet sorghum varieties in the dry farming area of Gansu Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(5): 947-957. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0358
[6]	LI Xiongxiong, JIAO Ting, LEI Zhaomin, ZHAO Shengguo, LI Fei, RAN Fu, QIN Weina. Effects of different silage additives on the nutritional quality and fermentation characteristics of mixed alfalfa[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(12): 2603-2614. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0068
[7]	LOU Chunhua, WANG Bo, LI Defeng, ZHU Xiaoyan, QI Shengli, WANG Chengzhang. Comparison of production performance and nutritional value of 16 oat varieties in Yellow River Beach area[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(7): 1843-1851. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0536
[8]	ZHANG Guangyu, WANG Jiangwei, ZHANG Haorui, FU Gang, SHEN Zhenxi. Comparative study on production performance and nutritional quality of eight imported oat varieties in the Shigatse region of Tibet, China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0732
[9]	Fa-ting Yin, Feng-hua Zhang. Nutritional quality of silage made with different ratios of forage rape and corn stalks[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 12(7): 1790-1796. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0462
[10]	Yang Yuan, Yin-chen Wang, Bing Zeng, Jin-hua Zhang, Yu-zhu Han. Effect of five Trichoderma strains on growth and nutritional quality of Orchard grass[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 12(2): 391-397. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0149

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1033) PDF downloads (377)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Influence of the production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in different ecological condition of Guizhou Province

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Influence of the production performance of Festuca arundinacea cv. Qiancao No.5 in different ecological condition of Guizhou Province

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content