Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-5-4 Sunday!
Qi-lei Xun, Sha-zhou An, Zong-jiu Sun, Na Liang, He-long Yang. Response of branch numbers of Seriphidum transiliense to grazing intensity in Xinjiang desert grassland[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 10(4): 748-754. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0585
Citation: Qi-lei Xun, Sha-zhou An, Zong-jiu Sun, Na Liang, He-long Yang. Response of branch numbers of Seriphidum transiliense to grazing intensity in Xinjiang desert grassland[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 10(4): 748-754. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0585

Response of branch numbers of Seriphidum transiliense to grazing intensity in Xinjiang desert grassland

More Information
  • Received Date: October 25, 2015
  • Revised Date: March 13, 2016
  • Published Date: April 19, 2016
  • In order to study the effects of grazing intensity on the branch number of Seriphidum transiliense and their response, the number and components of branch of S. transiliense were investigated every 30 days from 2012 to 2013 in desert grassland with four grazing intensities, including no grazing (CK), light grazing (LG), medium grazing (MG) and high grazing (HG) in Ashili Village, Changji City. The results showed that the branch numbers increased firstly and then decreased with the increase of grazing intensities which decreased in the following order: LG>CK>MG>HG. The vegetative branch numbers had the same variations which decreased in the following order: LG>CK>MG>HG. The vegetative branch numbers was the maximum in lighting grazing blocks which accounting for 20.5% of total branch number. The productive branch number in no grazing blocks was significant more(P<0.05)than that of the other three treatments. The reproductive branch numbers decreased with the increase of grazing intensities which decreased in the following order: CK>LG>MG>HG.
  • [1]
    Hutchings M J,Niering W A.Foraging in plants:The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition.Advances in Ecology Research,1994,25:159-238.
    [1]
    Wei P,An S Z,Sun Z J,Xun Q L,Sexual productive characteristic of Seriphidium transiliense community under grazing conditions.Pratacultural Science,2013,30(12):2054-2058.(in Chinese)
    [2]
    Xun Q L,An S Z,Sun Z J,Dong L L,Wei P.Effects of different grazing intensity on the Seriphidium transiliense community structure.Pratacultural Science,2013,30(12):2047-2053.(in Chinese)
    [2]
    魏鹏,安沙舟,孙宗玖,荀其蕾.放牧对伊犁绢蒿种群有性繁殖特性的影响.草业科学,2013,30(12):2054-2058.
    [3]
    Liu S L,Lin L,Zhang F W,Du Y G,Li Y K,Gou X W,Ouyang J Z,Cao G M.Effects of grazing season and degradation degree on the soil organic carbon in alpine meadow.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(1):11-18.(in Chinese)
    [3]
    荀其蕾,安沙舟,孙宗玖,董莉莉,魏鹏.放牧对伊犁绢蒿群落结构的影响.草业科学,2013,30(12):2047-2053.
    [4]
    Tian C,Liu Y,Yang X B.Fractal structure of dominant tree species in north-facing slope of mountain of northern Hebei.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(32):6753-6765.(in Chinese)
    [4]
    Harper J L.Plant demography and ecological theory.Oikos,1980,35:244-253.
    [5]
    Zhang G S,Deng H J,Yu W.Architectural responses of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings to different population density.Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2014,35(6):1062-1066.(in Chinese)
    [5]
    Barlow P W,Meristems metamers and modules and the development of shoot and root systems.Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,1989,100(3):255-279.
    [6]
    刘淑丽,林丽,张法伟,杜岩功,李以康,郭小伟,欧阳经政,曹广民.放牧季节及退化程度对高寒草甸土壤有机碳的影响.草业科学,2016,33(1):11-18.
    [6]
    Lu X,Nan Z B.Perspective in effects of grazing on diversity of grassland plant community and forage diseases.Pratacultural Science,2015,32(9):1423-1431.(in Chinese)
    [7]
    Liu H L,Zhu J Z,Jin G L,Fan Y M,Wang C H,Yang X W.Division on degraded successional series of Seriphidium transillense desert grassland,2007,44(2):137-141.(in Chinese)
    [7]
    田超,刘阳,杨新兵.冀北山地阴坡优势树种的树体分维结构.生态学报,2011,31(32):6753-6765.
    [8]
    Liu H L,Mao L C,Jin G L,Yao H Y,Chen C.Analysis of soil seed banks for different degraded stages of Seriphidium transillense desert grassland.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2012,20(5):413-418.(in Chinese)
    [8]
    张广帅,邓浩俊,俞伟.不同密度下木麻黄幼苗枝系特征变化的研究.热带作物学报,2014,35(6):1062-1066.
    [9]
    Jin G L.Study on the plant ecological adaptation strategy of degraded Seriphidium transiliense desert grassland.PhD Thesis.Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University,2009.(in Chinese)
    [9]
    卢翔,南志标.放牧对草地植物群落多样性和草地病害的影响.草业科学,2015,32(9):1423-1431.
    [10]
    Kuppers M.Ecological significance of aboveground architectural patterns in woody plants:A question of cost benefits relationships.Trends in Ecology #x00026; Evolution,1989,12:375-379.
    [10]
    Zheng W,Yu H.Effects of enclosure on growth and biomass allocation of Seriphidium transiliense modules in a sagebrush desert grassland.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2013,21(1):42-48.(in Chinese)
    [11]
    Hou Y R,Li X S,Ren Y P,Yi H,Zhu H,Wang J Y,Tuoliken#x000b7;Adalibieke,Hailatibieke#x000b7;Hahaerman.Effect of grassland vegetation nutrient and soil physical and chemical properties under grazing pressures.Pratacultural Science,2014,31(3):375-380.(in Chinese)
    [11]
    Davies A.The regrowth of grass swards.In:Jones M B,Lazenby A.(eds).The Grass Crop.London:Chapman and Hall Ltd.,1988:85-117.
    [12]
    刘洪来,朱进忠,靳瑰丽,范燕敏,王彩虹,杨兴伟.伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地退化演替序列的划分.新疆农业科学,2007,44(2):137-141.
    [12]
    Lin Y H,Wang S P.Response of plant and plant community to different stocking rates.Grassland of China,1999(3):11-19(in Chinese)
    [13]
    Li J H,Li Z Q.Clonal morphological plasticity and biomass allocation pattern of Artemisia frigid and Potentilla acaulis under different grazing intensities.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2002,26(4):435-440.(in Chinese)
    [13]
    司马义#x000b7;巴拉提.伊犁绢蒿解剖特征的初步研究.干旱区研究,1990(3):58-60.
    [14]
    Xiao C W.Effect of light interception ratio of neighbors on module growth of Pinus kwangtangensis .Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Science),2000,18(2):10-12.(in Chinese)
    [14]
    刘洪来,毛林灿,靳瑰丽,姚红艳,陈超.伊犁绢蒿荒漠不同退化阶段草地土壤种子库分析.草地学报,2012,20(5):413-418.
    [15]
    Hou Y R.Study on physiological and ecology adaptability of Seriphidium transiliense .PhD Thesis.Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University,2010.(in Chinese)
    [15]
    靳瑰丽.伊犁绢蒿荒漠退化草地植物生态适应对策的研究.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [16]
    郑伟,于辉.围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响.草地学报,2013,21(1):42-48.
    [16]
    Zhang X H,Zhu J Z,Sun Z J,Jin G L,Zheng W,Gu W R.Influence of grazing intensity on the aboveground biomass and nutrient dynamics of community.Pratacultural Science,2014,31(1):116-124.(in Chinese)
    [17]
    侯钰荣,李学森,任玉平,易华,朱昊,王吉云,托里肯#x000b7;阿达力别克,海拉提别克#x000b7;哈哈尔曼.牧压对草地植物养分和土壤理化性质的影响.草业科学,2014,31(3):375-380.
    [17]
    Xie Y G,Liao X F,Long X Q,Du Q C.Study on the modular characteristics of Rhododendron annae population,Guizhou Agricultural Science,2012,40(8):171-175.(in Chinese)
    [18]
    Jin X M.Reproductive ecological characters and mechanism of population competition of Agropron Michnoi .PhD Thesis.Beijing:Beijing Frestry University,2011.(in Chinese)
    [18]
    李永宏,汪诗平.放牧对草原植物的影响.中国草地,1999(3):11-19.
    [19]
    李金花,李镇清.不同放牧强度下冷蒿、星毛委陵菜的形态可塑性及生物量分配格局.植物生态学报,2002,26(4):435-440.
    [19]
    Zhong Z C.Reproductive strategies of plant population.Chinese Journal of Ecology,1995,14(1):37-42.(in Chinese)
    [20]
    Silvertown J W.Introduction to Plant Population Ecology.NewYork:Longman Group Limited,1982:1-13.
    [21]
    肖春旺.邻体截光率对华南五针松构件生长影响.贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,18(2):10-12.
    [22]
    侯钰荣.伊犁绢蒿生理生态适应性研究.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学博士学位论文,2010.
    [23]
    张鲜花,朱进忠,孙宗玖,靳瑰丽.郑伟.古伟容.放牧强度对草地牧草现存量及养分动态的影响.草业科学,2014,31(1):116-124.
    [24]
    谢元贵,廖小锋,龙秀琴,杜前程.桃叶杜鹃种群构件的特征研究.贵州农业科学,2012,40(8):171-175.
    [25]
    金晓明.米氏冰草繁殖生态学特征及种群竞争机制.北京:北京林业大学博士论文,2011.
    [26]
    钟章成.植物种群的繁殖对策.生态学杂志,1995,14(1):37-42.
    [27]
    Williams G C.Natural selection,the costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack#x02019;s principle.American Naturalist,1966,100(4):687-690.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Ruier, ZHANG Yanli, LIU Miao. Research progress on the reproductive allocation of grassland plants[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(8): 1948-1965. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2024-0201
    [2]XIAO Run, ZHENG Wang, ZHENG Lin, CAI Ming, XU Zeping, HUANG Xianzhi, LIU Jianyong, SHEN Yihong. Effects of mulberry branch and leaf powder on rumen microflora of Yunnan Yunling cattle[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(10): 2069-2078. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0586
    [3]YANG Qifang, CHEN Kaiqiong, GOU Qi, LYU Yan, LIU Jianli. Silage of abandoned-growing branches of Lycium barbarum[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(5): 1002-1009. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0462
    [4]Yu Wang, Run-cheng Bi, Wen-ming Ru. Niche and interspecific associations for dominant species in wetland herb communities in the northern branch of the Zhuozhang River Watershed, Shanxi[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 12(2): 276-285. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0276
    [5]Chang-e LIU, Guo-yan ZOU, Fu-xing LIU, Jin-qing WANG, Zi-shi FU, Ya-qin LIU. Species composition and distribution characteristics of herbaceous plants in branch creeks of Zhushan Bay of Taihu[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 8(6): 1131-1140. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2013-0438
    [6]Zi-wei SHEN, Zhi-biao NAN. Reproductive allocation and reproductive yield of Vicia unijuga at Gannan Tibetan region[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 8(5): 884-891. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2013-0266
    [7]Ismayil Asiya, Haxim Yakupjan, Xia ZHANG, Fuchun ZHANG. Chromosome number and karyotype analysis of Halostachys caspica[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 7(9): 1366-1368.
    [8]Jinlong SHA, Jian LI, Zhigang LI. Effects of adding poplar and willow branches on organic carbon, moisture and microbial activities of sandy soil[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 7(9): 1308-1312.
    [9]Gray system theory based analysis of hard branch cuttage of Salix oritrepha in alpine area[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 4(9): 86-90.
    [10]The chromosome number and karyotype analysis of Mirabilis jalapa[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 4(1): 52-55.

Catalog

    Article views (879) PDF downloads (221) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return