欢迎访问 草业科学,今天是2025年4月13日 星期日!

12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区生产性能及适应性

景芳, 刘彦明, 南铭, 边芳, 任生兰, 陈富, 张成君

景芳,刘彦明,南铭,边芳,任生兰,陈富,张成君. 12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区生产性能及适应性. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0059
引用本文: 景芳,刘彦明,南铭,边芳,任生兰,陈富,张成君. 12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区生产性能及适应性. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0059
JING F, LIU Y M, NAN M, BIAN F, REN S L, CHEN F, ZHANG C J. Production performance and adaptability of 12 oat varieties in the gully region of Loess Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0059
Citation: JING F, LIU Y M, NAN M, BIAN F, REN S L, CHEN F, ZHANG C J. Production performance and adaptability of 12 oat varieties in the gully region of Loess Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0059

12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区生产性能及适应性

基金项目: 通渭县燕麦产业绿色高效关键技术集成与示范项目(2022YFD1100502);甘肃重要乡土草及牧草种质创新与品种选育项目 (23ZDKA013)
摘要:

为筛选适宜黄土高原沟壑区种植的高产、抗倒伏、抗病性强的燕麦(Avena sativa)品种,以国内外引进的12个燕麦品种为试验材料,分析其产量相关性状、倒伏率和病害发生率,并利用灰色关联度分析和聚类分析法进行综合评价。结果表明:12个燕麦品种干草产量为10 800.00~15 233.33 kg·hm−2,平均干草产量13 298.61 kg·hm−2;种子产量为3 095.24~7 857.14 kg·hm−2,平均值5 407.14 kg·hm−2;其中,‘坝燕6号’的倒伏率较低,红叶病和锈病发病率最低,为抗倒伏兼抗病品种。灰色关联度分析结果表明:株高、干草产量、叶茎比在灰色关联评价系统中所占权重最高,是品种选择时的重要指标。采用聚类分析方法将12个燕麦品种划分为3个类群,第Ⅰ类群可作为饲草品种,第Ⅱ类群可作为籽粒型品种,第Ⅲ类群倒伏率及病情指数低,抗逆性好。综合灰色关联度和聚类分析方法,筛选出适宜黄土高原沟壑区种植的产量高、适应性好的饲草型燕麦品种‘加燕2号’,籽粒型燕麦品种‘坝燕6号’和‘美达’。

 

English

  • [1] 任长忠, 胡跃高, 刘景辉. 中国燕麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013: 1-4.

    REN C Z, HU Y G, LIU J H. Chinese Oatology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013: 1-4.

    [2] 王慧, 杨富, 姜超, 施毅, 李刚. 燕麦品种(系)的营养品质综合评价. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(2): 203-211.

    WANG H, YANG F, JIANG C, SHI Y, LI G. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of oat varieties (lines). Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(2): 203-211.

    [3]

    OBOUR A K, HOLMAN J D, SCHLEGEL A J. Seeding rate and nitrogen application effects on oat forage yield and nutritional value. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2019, 42(13): 1-9.

    [4] 张莹, 陈志飞, 张晓娜, 宋书红, 杨卓, 杨云贵. 不同刈割期对春播、秋播燕麦干草产量和品质的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 124-135.

    ZHANG Y, CHEN Z F, ZHANG X N, SONG S H, YANG Z, YANG Y G. Influence of different mowing time on yield and quality of spring and autumn sown oat hay. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(11): 124-135.

    [5]

    ABDELERALEIL S A M, ABDELRAZEEK N, SOLIMAN S A. Herbicidal activity of three sesquit empanel act ones on wild oat (Avena fatua) and their possible mode of action. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 6-9. doi: 10.1614/WS-08-093.1

    [6] 慕平, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 基于GGE-Biplot 的甘肃省不同生态区燕麦生产性能及适应性分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23 (6): 705.

    MU P, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K. Analysis of oats productivity and adaptability in different ecological regions of Gansu Province using GGE-Biplot. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23 (6): 705-712.

    [7] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 李晶, 柴继宽. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 125-133.

    NAN M, ZHAO G Q, LI J, CHAI J K. Correlation analysis and synthesize evaluation of yield and quality introduced oat varieties in semi-arid area of northwest. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 125-133.

    [8]

    ACHLEITNER A, TINKER N A, ZECHNER E. Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2008, 117(7): 1041-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0843-y

    [9] 张杰, 闫志坚, 尹强, 王慧, 于洁, 孟元发, 王育青. 22种燕麦饲草品种在达拉特旗地区的评价与筛选. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(6): 134-140.

    ZHANG J, YAN Z J, YIN Q, WANG H, YU J, MENG Y F, WANG Y Q. Evaluation and screening of twenty two oat forage cultivars in Dalad Qi. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(6): 134-140.

    [10] 魏小星, 阿啟兰, 刘勇, 贾志峰, 石红霄, 周青平, 刘芳. 青海东部农区不同饲用燕麦品种生产性能及营养品质的比较. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(6): 24-28.

    WEI X X, A Q L, LIU Y, JIA Z F, SHI H X, ZHOU Q P, LIU F. Study on the production performance and nutritional quality of different oat varieties in the pastoral region of eastern Qinghai Province. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(6): 24-28.

    [11] 曹丽霞, 赵世锋, 石碧红, 张新军, 李云霞, 杨志敏. 6个饲用燕麦品种不同刈割期的产草量比较. 河北农业科学, 2017, 21(6): 11-16.

    CAO L X, ZHAO S F, SHI B H, ZHANG X J, LI Y X, YANG Z M. Comparison of grass yield of six forage oat varieties at different mowing periods. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 21(6): 11-16.

    [12] 王霞. 不同饲用燕麦和玉米品种在乌兰察布不同地区品比研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2020.

    WANG X. Study on forage oat and maize varieties in different areas of Ulanqab. Master Thesis. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020.

    [13] 赵怡然, 高峰, 白倩, 苗福泓, 杨国峰, 孙震, 刘洪庆, 孙娟. 山东地区宜栽燕麦品种筛选. 青岛农业大学学报, 2018, 35(1): 022-026.

    ZHAO Y R, GAO F, BAI Q, MIAO F H, YANG G F, SUN Z, LIU H Q, SUN J. Screening of suitable oat varieties for early spring cultivation in Shandong Province. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University, 2018, 35(1): 022-026.

    [14] 赵宁, 赵秀芳, 赵来喜, 戎郁萍. 不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 68-72.

    ZHAO N, ZHAO X F, ZHAO L X, RONG Y P. Adaptability evaluation of different Avena sativa varieties in Bashang, Hebei Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 68-72.

    [15] 吴亚, 张卫红, 陈鸣晖, 刘大林. 不同品种燕麦在扬州地区的生产性能. 草业科学, 2018, 35(7): 1728-1733.

    WU Y, ZHANG W H, CHEN M H, LIU D L. Production performance of different oat varieties in Yangzhou region. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(7): 1728-1733.

    [16] 杨海磊, 徐长林, 鱼小军, 肖红, 张建文, 安晓东, 杨发森, 任宝虎, 周瑞娟. 14份燕麦种质在肃南皇城镇的生产性能比较. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.

    YANG H L, XU C L, YU X J, XIAO H, ZHANG J W, AN X D, YANG F S, REN B H, ZHOU R J. Comparative study on the performance of 14 oat (Avena sativa) germplasm in Huangcheng Town of Sunan County, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.

    [17] 张光雨, 王江伟, 张豪睿, 付刚, 沈振西. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较. 草业科学, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125.

    ZHANG G Y, WANG J W, ZHANG H R, FU G, SHEN Z X. Comparative study on production performance and nutritional quality of eight imported oat varieties in the Shigatse region of Tibet, China. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125.

    [18] 赵祎伟, 马祥, 张然, 马晖玲. 青海东部农区高产优质燕麦品种筛选. 草业科学, 2020, 37(3): 532-541.

    ZHAO Y W, MA X, ZHANG R, MA H L. Selection of high-yield and good-quality oat varieties in the eastern agricultural area of Qinghai Province. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(3): 532-541.

    [19] 柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

    CHAI J K, MU P, ZHAO G Q. Study on Yield stability and test representative study of eight oat varieties in Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

    [20] 郑殿升, 王晓鸣, 张京. 燕麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 55-57.

    ZHENG D S, WANG X M, ZHANG J. Specification and Data Standard for Description of Oat Germplasm Resources. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006: 55-57.

    [21] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1443.6-2007 小麦抗病虫性评价技术规范. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.

    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, PRC. NY/T 1443.6-2007 Technical Specification for Evaluation of Wheat Resistance to Disease and Insect. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.

    [22] 徐雅梅, 张卫红, 蔺永和, 刘大林, 苗彦军. 锰对西藏不同地域野生赖草萌发的影响及评价. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(5): 73-79.

    XU Y M, ZHANG W H, LIN Y H, LIU D L, MIAO Y J. Effects and evaluations on germination on period of wild Leymus secalinus in different regions of Tibet under the MnC12 stress. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 40(5): 73-79.

    [23] 张成君, 任生兰, 边芳, 黄凯, 陈富, 杨洁, 张明, 刘彦明. 陇中黄土高原半干旱区 9 个燕麦品种籽粒产量及其营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089.

    ZHANG C J, REN S L, BIAN FANG, HUANG K, CHEN F, YANG J, ZHANG M, LIU Y M. Study on the grain yield and nutritional value of nine oat varieties in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau in central Gansu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089.

    [24] 南铭, 景芳, 边芳, 任生兰, 刘彦明. 6个裸燕麦品种在甘肃中部引洮灌区的生产性能及饲用价值比较. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.

    NAN M, JING F, BIAN F, REN S L, LIU Y M. Comparison of production performance and feeding value of six oat varieties at Tao river irrigation middle-area in Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.

    [25] 琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 贾志峰, 梁国玲. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价, 草业学报, 2019, 28 (9): 77-86.

    JU Z L, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K, JIA Z F, LIANG G L. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value and silage fermentation quality of of different oat varieties in central Gansu Province, Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28 (9): 77-86.

    [26] 王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 李峰, 于林清, 远婷, 梁潇, 周文秀. 冀西北地区 21 个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价, 草地学报, 2020, 28 (5): 1311-1318.

    WANG Y T, YANG Z M, LIU J C, LI F, YU L Q, YUAN T, LIANG X, ZHOU W X. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 21 oat varieties in northwest Hebei Province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 28 (5): 1311-1318.

    [27] 彭先琴, 周青平, 刘文辉, 魏小星, 田莉华, 陈有军, 王沛. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5): 1208-1217.

    PENG X Q, ZHOU Q P, LIU W H, WEI X X, TIAN L H, CHEN Y J, WANG P. A comparative analysis of growth characteristics of six oat cultivars in the north-west Sichuan Alpine Region. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5): 1208-1217.

    [28] 王国良, 吴波, 张进红, 姜慧新, 孙启忠. 黄河三角洲地区不同品种燕麦生产性能比较, 中国草地学报, 2020, 42 (6): 141-148.

    WANG G L, WU B, ZHANG J H, JIANG H X, SUN Q Z. The Comparison of production of different oat varieties in the Yellow River Delta, Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42 (6): 141-148.

    [29] 吴海艳, 曲珍, 刘昭明, 拉巴顿珠, 同桑措姆, 曲尼, 尼玛, 卓嘎, 马玉寿. 基于主成分分析的燕麦品种生产性能的比较研究, 草地学报, 2021, 29 (9): 1967-1973.

    WU H Y, QU Z, LIU Z M, Labadunzhu, Tongsangcuomu, QU N, NI M, ZHUO G, MA Y T. Comparative study on production performance of oat varieties based on principal component analysis, Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29 (9): 1967-1973.

    [30] 张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 王江伟, 沈振西, 付刚. 西藏河谷区 9 个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

    ZHANG G Y, MA H P, SHAO X M, WANG J W, SHEN Z X, FU G. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the valley region of Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

    [31] 柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 燕麦种子产量构成因子与产量的关联性分析, 草地学报, 2012, 20 (1): 49-53.

    CHAI J K, ZHAO G Q, SHI S L. Association analysis between seed yield and yield components of oats. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20 (1): 49-53.

    [32] 张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳. 江淮地区燕麦籽粒产量与农艺性状的相关性及通径分析. 作物杂志, 2021(5): 146-152.

    ZHANG Q, WEI Z W, YAN T F. Correlation and path analysis of oat seed yield with agronomic characters in Jiang-Huai area. Crops, 2021(5): 146-152.

    [33] 郭兴燕, 梁丹妮, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区燕麦品种生产性能及营养价值研究. 作物杂志, 2016(4): 105-111.

    GUO X Y, LIANG D N, LAN J. Research on productive performance and nutritive value of 11 oat varieties in Ningxia irrigation area. Crops, 2016(4): 105-111.

    [34] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 20份饲草型燕麦品种的抗倒伏性研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(5): 62-68.

    NAN M, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K. Study on lodging resistance of 20 forage oat (Avena sativa) varieties. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(5): 62-68.

    [35] 胡凯军. 抗红叶病燕麦种质评价与筛选. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2010.

    Hu Kaijun. Evaluation and screening of Oat germplasm resistant to red leaf disease. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2010.

    [36] 赵峰, 郭满库, 郭成, 尚新新, 赵志鹏, 赵桂琴. 213份燕麦种质的白粉病抗性评价. 草业科学, 2017, 34(2): 331-338.

    ZHAO F, GUO M K, GUO C, SHANG X X, ZHAO Z P, ZHAO G Q. Powdery mildew resistance evaluation of 213 oat germplasm resistance powdery mildew. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(2): 331-338.

    [37] 郭斌, 郭满库, 郭成, 尚新新, 赵志鹏, 赵桂琴. 燕麦种质资源抗白粉病鉴定及利用评价. 植物保护, 2012, 38(4): 144-146.

    GUO B, GUO M K, GUO C, SHANG X X, ZHAO Z P, ZHAO G Q. Identification and evaluation of oat germplasm resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Protection, 2012, 38(4): 144-146.

    [38] 孙浩洋, 赵桂琴, 张建贵, 李鑫, 杨琰珊, 柴继宽, 曾亮, 焦润安, 金小雯, 黎蓉, 宫文龙. 甘肃省燕麦主产区白粉病调查及病原鉴定. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.

    SUN H Y, ZHAO G Q, ZHANG J G, LI X, YANG Y S, CHAI J K, ZENG L, JIAO R A, JIN X W, LI R, GONG W L. Incidence of oat powdery mildew and pathogen identification in the main oat production areas of Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.

    [39] 周青平, 颜红波, 梁国玲, 贾志峰, 刘文辉, 田莉华, 陈有军, 陈仕勇. 不同燕麦品种饲草和籽粒生产性能分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.

    ZHOU Q P, YAN H B, LIANG G L, JIA Z F, LIU W H, TIAN L H, CHEN Y J, CHEN S Y. Analysis of the forage and grain productivity of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.

    [40] 姜慧新, 柏杉杉, 吴波, 宋静怡, 王国良. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 140-149.

    JIANG H X, BAI S S, WU B, SONG J Y, WANG G L. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic straits and forage quality of 22 oat varieties in the Huang−Huai−Hai area of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 140-149.

  • 图  1   不同燕麦品种的干草产量

    Figure  1.   Hay yield of different oat varieties

    图  2   不同燕麦品种系统聚类图

    Figure  2.   Cluster analysis diagram of different oat varieties

    表  1   供试燕麦品种及来源

    Table  1   The oat varieties used in the experiment and their sources

    燕麦品种
    Oat variety
    品种来源
    Sources of variety
    皮/裸
    Hulled or naked
    燕王
    Yanwang
    北京正道种业有限公司
    Beijing Zhengdao
    Seed Industry Co. LTD

    Hulled
    美达
    Meida

    Hulled
    梦龙
    Menglong

    Hulled
    莫妮卡
    Monica

    Hulled
    加燕2号
    Jiayan No.2
    青海畜牧兽医科学院
    Qinghai Academy of Animal
    Husbandry and Veterinary
    Sciences

    Hulled
    青海甜燕麦
    Qinghai sweet oat

    Hulled
    青引1号
    Qingyin No.1

    Hulled
    陇燕3号
    Longyan No.3
    甘肃农业大学
    Gansu Agricultural University

    Hulled
    定引1号
    Dingyin No.1
    定西市农业科学研究院
    Dingxi Academy of Agricultural
    Research Science

    Hulled
    白燕19号
    Baiyan No.19
    白城市农业科学院
    Baicheng Academy of
    Agricultural Science

    Hulled
    坝燕4号
    Bayan No.4
    河北张家口
    Zhangjiakou,
    Hebei Province

    Hulled
    坝燕6号
    Bayan No.6

    Hulled
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   不同燕麦品种饲草产量的相关性状

    Table  2   Forage related yield traits of different oat varieties

    品种名称
    Variety name
    鲜草产量
    Fresh yield/(kg·hm−2)
    鲜干比
    Fresh dry/%
    茎重
    Stem weight/g
    叶重
    Leaf weight/g
    叶茎比
    Leaf-to-stem ratio
    燕王 Yanwang 69 166.67 ± 5 140.80a 5.28 ± 0.19a 525.40 ± 102.70a 409.12 ± 97.50ab 0.76 ± 0.05d
    美达 Meida 47 166.67 ± 5 856.15bcd 3.82 ± 0.31cd 263.82 ± 69.12b 271.48 ± 42.55b 1.14 ± 0.09a
    梦龙 Menglong 60 833.33 ± 7 939.00abc 4.06 ± 0.60bcd 510.50 ± 136.54a 503.48 ± 136.06a 0.98 ± 0.02abc
    莫妮卡 Monica 53 000.00 ± 4 090.64abcd 4.81 ± 0.21abc 277.82 ± 32.05b 253.52 ± 30.99b 0.92 ± 0.03bcd
    加燕2号 Jiayan No.2 55 000.00 ± 2 221.11abcd 3.73 ± 0.28cd 214.42 ± 17.94b 212.15 ± 16.36b 1.00 ± 0.05abc
    青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat 38 833.33 ± 2 482.16d 3.62 ± 0.17d 290.17 ± 61.53b 280.00 ± 57.40b 0.97 ± 0.06abc
    青引1号 Qingyin No.1 58 166.67 ± 6 041.06abc 3.84 ± 0.31bcd 357.67 ± 50.88ab 383.20 ± 78.16ab 1.03 ± 0.07ab
    陇燕3号 Longyan No.3 61 833.33 ± 7 695.96abc 4.35 ± 0.19abcd 262.17 ± 30.60b 255.83 ± 35.26b 0.97 ± 0.05abc
    定引1号 Dingyin No.1 56 333.33 ± 4 862.56abc 3.87 ± 0.13bcd 301.83 ± 20.26b 231.00 ± 19.35b 0.77 ± 0.04d
    白燕19号 Baiyan No.19 45 500.00 ± 6 815.42cd 4.14 ± 0.50bcd 258.90 ± 37.11b 278.48 ± 33.20b 1.11 ± 0.06ab
    坝燕4号 Bayan No.4 69 333.33 ± 3 252.35a 4.81 ± 0.40abc 336.73 ± 25.22ab 287.80 ± 50.06b 0.83 ± 0.08cd
    坝燕6号 Bayan No.6 63 500.00 ± 5 058.00ab 4.96 ± 0.45ab 306.10 ± 26.77b 329.70 ± 29.45ab 1.09 ± 0.08ab
     同列不同小写字母表示不同品种间差异显著(P < 0.05),下同。
     Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences between different varieties at the 0.05 level. This is applicable for the following tables as well.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   不同燕麦品种的农艺性状

    Table  3   Agronomic traits of different oat varieties

    品种名称
    Variety name
    株高
    Plant
    height/cm
    有效分蘖
    Effective
    tillers
    茎粗
    Stem diameter/
    mm
    茎节数
    Internode
    number
    旗叶长度
    Flag leaf
    length/cm
    旗叶宽度
    Flag leaf
    width/cm
    燕王 Yanwang 105.83 ± 7.59c 2.17 ± 0.21abc 4.54 ± 0.33ab 4.22 ± 0.16abc 15.33 ± 1.48b 1.63 ± 0.09abc
    美达 Meida 110.00 ± 6.55bc 2.48 ± 0.17ab 3.85 ± 0.22b 3.60 ± 0.18ab 15.93 ± 1.87b 1.50 ± 0.06c
    梦龙 Menglong 130.50 ± 5.11a 1.75 ± 0.25c 3.81 ± 0.25b 4.33 ± 0.33cd 18.67 ± 0.88ab 1.72 ± 0.04abc
    莫妮卡 Monica 114.00 ± 4.37abc 2.33 ± 0.21abc 3.58 ± 0.34b 3.88 ± 0.18abcd 16.00 ± 0.87b 1.50 ± 0.12c
    加燕2号 Jiayan No.2 132.00 ± 6.35a 2.47 ± 0.19ab 3.72 ± 0.11b 3.50 ± 0.19d 19.60 ± 2.50ab 1.90 ± 0.18abc
    青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat 125.72 ± 5.80ab 2.45 ± 0.24abc 4.22 ± 0.42ab 4.00 ± 0.26abcd 20.27 ± 2.23ab 1.97 ± 0.18ab
    青引1号 Qingyin No.1 126.17 ± 4.90ab 2.33 ± 0.17abc 3.85 ± 0.40b 3.67 ± 0.21bcd 20.90 ± 1.99ab 1.94 ± 0.24abc
    陇燕3号 Longyan No.3 129.95 ± 5.14a 2.70 ± 0.33a 3.90 ± 0.30b 4.27 ± 0.31abc 17.73 ± 1.65ab 1.79 ± 0.16abc
    定引1号 Dingyin No.1 131.17 ± 7.49a 2.05 ± 0.23abc 4.27 ± 0.78ab 4.38 ± 0.16a 17.00 ± 1.89ab 1.60 ± 0.20abc
    白燕19号 Baiyan No.19 105.50 ± 4.31c 2.17 ± 0.18abc 3.37 ± 0.27b 3.60 ± 0.17cd 16.10 ± 1.36b 1.55 ± 0.03bc
    坝燕4号 Bayan No.4 117.83 ± 5.13abc 2.37 ± 0.15abc 4.17 ± 0.51ab 4.23 ± 0.16abc 22.60 ± 1.45a 1.69 ± 0.03abc
    坝燕6号 Bayan No.6 127.83 ± 6.73ab 1.82 ± 0.20bc 5.23 ± 0.57a 3.92 ± 0.11abcd 18.77 ± 1.08ab 2.02 ± 0.09a
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   不同燕麦品种种子产量相关性状

    Table  4   Seed yield related traits of different oat varieties

    品种名称
    Variety name
    穗长
    Ear
    length/cm
    单株粒数
    Grain number
    per spike
    单株粒重
    Grain weight
    per spike/g
    种子产量
    Seed yield/
    (kg·hm−2)
    千粒重
    Thousand seed
    weight/g
    燕王 Yanwang 21.00 ± 1.73bc 77.02 ± 5.59ab 2.25 ± 0.25bcd 6 619.05 ± 454.26ab 29.02 ± 0.25fg
    美达 Meida 18.00 ± 1.16c 94.08 ± 5.15a 3.01 ± 0.21a 5 761.91 ± 125.99bc 30.07 ± 0.48ef
    梦龙 Menglong 25.00 ± 1.16abc 57.25 ± 5.92bc 1.56 ± 0.20cde 5 619.05 ± 423.25bc 28.65 ± 0.34fg
    莫妮卡 Monica 25.33 ± 0.33abc 50.52 ± 3.90c 1.41 ± 0.14e 5 238.10 ± 415.13c 27.20 ± 0.85g
    加燕2号 Jiayan No.2 26.67 ± 1.20ab 76.02 ± 3.99ab 2.42 ± 0.22ab 5 666.67 ± 497.16bc 28.37 ± 0.48fg
    青海甜燕麦 Qinghai sweet oat 29.00 ± 1.00ab 50.08 ± 4.79c 1.91 ± 0.26bcde 3 809.52 ± 579.31de 39.80 ± 0.43a
    青引1号 Qingyin No.1 24.33 ± 0.33abc 56.88 ± 6.37bc 2.08 ± 0.22bcde 5 142.86 ± 824.79c 37.80 ± 1.02b
    陇燕3号 Longyan No.3 29.67 ± 2.60a 52.03 ± 4.87c 1.52 ± 0.19de 3 095.24 ± 454.26e 25.42 ± 0.67h
    定引1号 Dingyin No.1 25.67 ± 6.44abc 67.35 ± 6.48bc 1.82 ± 0.22bcde 4 409.52 ± 153.27cd 24.87 ± 0.50h
    白燕19号 Baiyan No.19 21.67 ± 3.67abc 63.00 ± 7.03bc 2.18 ± 0.24bcde 4 571.43 ± 82.48cd 31.25 ± 0.86de
    坝燕4号 Bayan No.4 24.33 ± 0.88abc 65.50 ± 10.93 2.16 ± 0.40bcde 7 857.14 ± 82.48a 35.53 ± 0.56c
    坝燕6号 Bayan No.6 27.67 ± 1.20ab 64.62 ± 6.89bc 2.34 ± 0.29abc 7 095.24 ± 47.62a 32.12 ± 0.16d
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   不同燕麦品种倒伏率及病害发生情况

    Table  5   Lodging and disease occurrence of different oat varieties

    品种名称
    Variety name
    实际倒伏率
    Actual lodging
    rate/%
    红叶病 Red-leaf disease 白粉病 Powdery mildew 锈病 Rust disease
    发病率
    Incidence
    rate/%
    病情指数
    Disease
    index
    发病率
    Incidence
    rate/%
    病情指数
    Disease
    index
    发病率
    Incidence
    rate/%
    病情指数
    Disease
    index
    燕王 Yanwang 28.88 ± 16.02c 20.87 ± 1.27g 5.56 ± 0.16h 70.33 ± 2.60a 27.61 ± 0.70a 4.00 ± 2.08d 0.00 ± 0.00d
    美达 Meida 31.12 ± 16.57c 48.40 ± 1.51b 17.22 ± 0.94b 42.33 ± 1.45b 8.47 ± 0.66d 8.00 ± 1.53d 0.00 ± 0.00d
    梦龙 Menglong 100.00 ± 0.00a 35.13 ± 0.93d 14.40 ± 0.44cd 24.83 ± 1.01cd 5.66 ± 0.69e 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d
    莫妮卡 Monica 82.50 ± 6.29ab 30.60 ± 1.31e 10.80 ± 0.67ef 30.03 ± 0.90c 5.72 ± 0.52e 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d
    加燕2号 Jiayan No.2 79.93 ± 16.14ab 35.40 ± 1.40d 7.62 ± 0.63gh 19.70 ± 1.60d 4.69 ± 0.12e 6.00 ± 2.08d 1.59 ± 0.26d
    青海甜燕麦
    Qinghai sweet oat
    81.33 ± 16.38ab 48.30 ± 1.25b 14.80 ± 0.50c 50.13 ± 1.39b 9.82 ± 0.81cd 28.60 ± 1.53b 8.40 ± 1.06c
    青引1号 Qingyin No.1 56.00 ± 14.19abc 65.63 ± 1.34a 25.67 ± 0.69a 45.07 ± 9.33b 10.78 ± 1.44bcd 37.00 ± 4.36b 18.38 ± 0.98b
    陇燕3号 Longyan No.3 76.00 ± 16.00ab 24.80 ± 1.22f 5.59 ± 0.06h 62.93 ± 1.90a 12.57 ± 0.46b 31.13 ± 2.14b 17.54 ± 1.07b
    定引1号 Dingyin No.1 80.00 ± 16.33ab 30.60 ± 0.86e 10.39 ± 0.42ef 50.07 ± 0.87b 10.59 ± 1.12bcd 52.33 ± 5.24a 18.58 ± 0.96b
    白燕19号 Baiyan No.19 38.33 ± 15.53bc 28.33 ± 1.00ef 9.71 ± 0.96fg 44.97 ± 1.36b 9.21 ± 0.76d 17.10 ± 4.82c 16.92 ± 0.96b
    坝燕4号 Bayan No.4 39.35 ± 13.85bc 42.63 ± 1.00c 12.22 ± 0.81de 15.53 ± 2.44d 12.12 ± 0.90bc 49.40 ± 2.62a 34.99 ± 1.04a
    坝燕6号 Bayan No.6 15.00 ± 7.19c 20.70 ± 1.51g 12.10 ± 1.51e 40.90 ± 1.16b 12.47 ± 0.96bc 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6   燕麦各性状关联度分析

    Table  6   Correlation degrees of various traits in oat

    品种名称
    Variety
    name
    干草产量
    Hay
    yield
    叶茎比
    Leaf-to-stem
    ratio
    有效分蘖
    Effective
    tillers
    株高
    Plant
    height
    千粒重
    Thousand seed
    weight
    单株粒数
    Grain number
    per spike
    单株粒重
    Grain weight
    per spike
    种子产量
    Seed
    yield
    倒伏率
    Lodging
    rate
    红叶病
    Red-leaf
    disease
    白粉病
    Powdery
    mildew
    锈病
    Rust
    disease
    加权关联度
    Weighted
    correlation
    degree
    排序
    Ranking
    燕王
    Yanwang
    0.987 0.970 0.982 0.982 0.975 0.983 0.977 0.985 0.919 1.000 0.683 0.913 0.949 4
    美达
    Meida
    0.981 1.000 0.992 0.984 0.977 1.000 1.000 0.975 0.907 0.834 0.929 0.913 0.961 3
    梦龙
    Menglong
    1.000 0.987 0.968 0.999 0.974 0.964 0.956 0.974 0.650 0.869 0.981 0.913 0.942 6
    莫妮卡
    Monica
    0.974 0.982 0.987 0.987 0.971 0.958 0.952 0.969 0.700 0.918 0.980 0.913 0.945 5
    加燕2号
    Jiayan No.2
    0.998 0.989 0.992 1.000 0.973 0.982 0.982 0.974 0.708 0.966 1.000 1.000 0.967 1
    青海甜燕麦
    Qinghai sweet oat
    0.973 0.986 0.991 0.996 1.000 0.957 0.966 0.953 0.704 0.863 0.906 0.710 0.926 8
    青引1号
    Qingyin No.1
    0.999 0.991 0.987 0.996 0.995 0.964 0.971 0.968 0.794 0.744 0.890 0.499 0.912 12
    陇燕3号
    Longyan No.3
    0.993 0.987 1.000 0.999 0.967 0.959 0.955 0.945 0.721 1.000 0.862 0.512 0.920 9
    定引1号
    Dingyin No.1
    0.996 0.970 0.978 0.999 0.966 0.974 0.964 0.960 0.708 0.924 0.893 0.496 0.915 11
    白燕19号
    Baiyan No.19
    0.973 0.998 0.982 0.981 0.980 0.970 0.974 0.962 0.871 0.934 0.916 0.521 0.932 7
    坝燕4号
    Bayan No.4
    0.997 0.975 0.989 0.990 0.990 0.972 0.974 1.000 0.866 0.898 0.869 0.333 0.919 10
    坝燕6号
    Bayan No.6
    0.986 0.996 0.970 0.997 0.982 0.971 0.979 0.991 1.000 0.899 0.864 0.913 0.964 2
    关联度
    Relevancy
    0.988 0.986 0.985 0.992 0.979 0.971 0.971 0.971 0.796 0.904 0.898 0.720
    权重系数
    Weight coefficient
    0.089 0.088 0.088 0.089 0.088 0.087 0.087 0.087 0.071 0.081 0.080 0.065
    排名
    Ranking
    2 3 4 1 5 7 8 6 11 9 10 12
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7   不同燕麦品种类群划分

    Table  7   Classification of different oat varieties

    性状
    Trait
    类群 Ⅰ Group Ⅰ 类群 Ⅱ Group Ⅱ 类群 Ⅲ Group Ⅲ
    平均值
    Average
    变异系数(CV)
    Coefficent of
    variation/%
    平均值
    Average
    变异系数(CV)
    Coefficent of
    variation/%
    平均值
    Average
    变异系数(CV)
    Coefficent of
    variation/%
    干草产量 Hay yield 14 803.33 2.59 13 233.34 7.18 10 877.78 0.80
    叶茎比 Leaf-to-stem ratio 0.95 9.90 0.95 17.08 1.00 8.09
    有效分蘖 Effective tillers 2.26 14.63 2.21 11.36 2.32 4.95
    株高 Plant height 129.96 1.55 115.37 7.27 115.07 7.20
    千粒重 Thousand seed weight 29.03 16.00 31.69 7.84 32.75 16.04
    单株粒数 Grain number per spike 61.91 13.96 75.31 15.79 54.53 10.98
    单株粒重 Grain weight per spike 1.88 17.92 2.44 13.74 1.83 17.40
    种子产量 Seed yield 4 786.67 20.03 6 833.34 11.12 4 539.68 12.86
    倒伏率 Lodging rate 78.39 17.85 28.59 30.64 67.39 30.50
    红叶病病情指数 Red-leaf disease 12.73 55.84 11.78 35.16 11.77 18.59
    白粉病病情指数 Powdery mildew 8.86 35.00 15.17 48.48 8.25 21.89
    锈病病情指数 Rust disease 11.22 76.06 8.75 173.21 8.44 81.84
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 任长忠, 胡跃高, 刘景辉. 中国燕麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013: 1-4.

    REN C Z, HU Y G, LIU J H. Chinese Oatology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013: 1-4.

    [2] 王慧, 杨富, 姜超, 施毅, 李刚. 燕麦品种(系)的营养品质综合评价. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(2): 203-211.

    WANG H, YANG F, JIANG C, SHI Y, LI G. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of oat varieties (lines). Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(2): 203-211.

    [3]

    OBOUR A K, HOLMAN J D, SCHLEGEL A J. Seeding rate and nitrogen application effects on oat forage yield and nutritional value. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2019, 42(13): 1-9.

    [4] 张莹, 陈志飞, 张晓娜, 宋书红, 杨卓, 杨云贵. 不同刈割期对春播、秋播燕麦干草产量和品质的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 124-135.

    ZHANG Y, CHEN Z F, ZHANG X N, SONG S H, YANG Z, YANG Y G. Influence of different mowing time on yield and quality of spring and autumn sown oat hay. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(11): 124-135.

    [5]

    ABDELERALEIL S A M, ABDELRAZEEK N, SOLIMAN S A. Herbicidal activity of three sesquit empanel act ones on wild oat (Avena fatua) and their possible mode of action. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 6-9. doi: 10.1614/WS-08-093.1

    [6] 慕平, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 基于GGE-Biplot 的甘肃省不同生态区燕麦生产性能及适应性分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23 (6): 705.

    MU P, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K. Analysis of oats productivity and adaptability in different ecological regions of Gansu Province using GGE-Biplot. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23 (6): 705-712.

    [7] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 李晶, 柴继宽. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 125-133.

    NAN M, ZHAO G Q, LI J, CHAI J K. Correlation analysis and synthesize evaluation of yield and quality introduced oat varieties in semi-arid area of northwest. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 125-133.

    [8]

    ACHLEITNER A, TINKER N A, ZECHNER E. Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2008, 117(7): 1041-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0843-y

    [9] 张杰, 闫志坚, 尹强, 王慧, 于洁, 孟元发, 王育青. 22种燕麦饲草品种在达拉特旗地区的评价与筛选. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(6): 134-140.

    ZHANG J, YAN Z J, YIN Q, WANG H, YU J, MENG Y F, WANG Y Q. Evaluation and screening of twenty two oat forage cultivars in Dalad Qi. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(6): 134-140.

    [10] 魏小星, 阿啟兰, 刘勇, 贾志峰, 石红霄, 周青平, 刘芳. 青海东部农区不同饲用燕麦品种生产性能及营养品质的比较. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(6): 24-28.

    WEI X X, A Q L, LIU Y, JIA Z F, SHI H X, ZHOU Q P, LIU F. Study on the production performance and nutritional quality of different oat varieties in the pastoral region of eastern Qinghai Province. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(6): 24-28.

    [11] 曹丽霞, 赵世锋, 石碧红, 张新军, 李云霞, 杨志敏. 6个饲用燕麦品种不同刈割期的产草量比较. 河北农业科学, 2017, 21(6): 11-16.

    CAO L X, ZHAO S F, SHI B H, ZHANG X J, LI Y X, YANG Z M. Comparison of grass yield of six forage oat varieties at different mowing periods. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 21(6): 11-16.

    [12] 王霞. 不同饲用燕麦和玉米品种在乌兰察布不同地区品比研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2020.

    WANG X. Study on forage oat and maize varieties in different areas of Ulanqab. Master Thesis. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020.

    [13] 赵怡然, 高峰, 白倩, 苗福泓, 杨国峰, 孙震, 刘洪庆, 孙娟. 山东地区宜栽燕麦品种筛选. 青岛农业大学学报, 2018, 35(1): 022-026.

    ZHAO Y R, GAO F, BAI Q, MIAO F H, YANG G F, SUN Z, LIU H Q, SUN J. Screening of suitable oat varieties for early spring cultivation in Shandong Province. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University, 2018, 35(1): 022-026.

    [14] 赵宁, 赵秀芳, 赵来喜, 戎郁萍. 不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 68-72.

    ZHAO N, ZHAO X F, ZHAO L X, RONG Y P. Adaptability evaluation of different Avena sativa varieties in Bashang, Hebei Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 68-72.

    [15] 吴亚, 张卫红, 陈鸣晖, 刘大林. 不同品种燕麦在扬州地区的生产性能. 草业科学, 2018, 35(7): 1728-1733.

    WU Y, ZHANG W H, CHEN M H, LIU D L. Production performance of different oat varieties in Yangzhou region. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(7): 1728-1733.

    [16] 杨海磊, 徐长林, 鱼小军, 肖红, 张建文, 安晓东, 杨发森, 任宝虎, 周瑞娟. 14份燕麦种质在肃南皇城镇的生产性能比较. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.

    YANG H L, XU C L, YU X J, XIAO H, ZHANG J W, AN X D, YANG F S, REN B H, ZHOU R J. Comparative study on the performance of 14 oat (Avena sativa) germplasm in Huangcheng Town of Sunan County, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 129-135.

    [17] 张光雨, 王江伟, 张豪睿, 付刚, 沈振西. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较. 草业科学, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125.

    ZHANG G Y, WANG J W, ZHANG H R, FU G, SHEN Z X. Comparative study on production performance and nutritional quality of eight imported oat varieties in the Shigatse region of Tibet, China. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(4): 1117-1125.

    [18] 赵祎伟, 马祥, 张然, 马晖玲. 青海东部农区高产优质燕麦品种筛选. 草业科学, 2020, 37(3): 532-541.

    ZHAO Y W, MA X, ZHANG R, MA H L. Selection of high-yield and good-quality oat varieties in the eastern agricultural area of Qinghai Province. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(3): 532-541.

    [19] 柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

    CHAI J K, MU P, ZHAO G Q. Study on Yield stability and test representative study of eight oat varieties in Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

    [20] 郑殿升, 王晓鸣, 张京. 燕麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 55-57.

    ZHENG D S, WANG X M, ZHANG J. Specification and Data Standard for Description of Oat Germplasm Resources. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006: 55-57.

    [21] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1443.6-2007 小麦抗病虫性评价技术规范. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.

    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, PRC. NY/T 1443.6-2007 Technical Specification for Evaluation of Wheat Resistance to Disease and Insect. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.

    [22] 徐雅梅, 张卫红, 蔺永和, 刘大林, 苗彦军. 锰对西藏不同地域野生赖草萌发的影响及评价. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(5): 73-79.

    XU Y M, ZHANG W H, LIN Y H, LIU D L, MIAO Y J. Effects and evaluations on germination on period of wild Leymus secalinus in different regions of Tibet under the MnC12 stress. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 40(5): 73-79.

    [23] 张成君, 任生兰, 边芳, 黄凯, 陈富, 杨洁, 张明, 刘彦明. 陇中黄土高原半干旱区 9 个燕麦品种籽粒产量及其营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089.

    ZHANG C J, REN S L, BIAN FANG, HUANG K, CHEN F, YANG J, ZHANG M, LIU Y M. Study on the grain yield and nutritional value of nine oat varieties in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau in central Gansu. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 3082-3089.

    [24] 南铭, 景芳, 边芳, 任生兰, 刘彦明. 6个裸燕麦品种在甘肃中部引洮灌区的生产性能及饲用价值比较. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.

    NAN M, JING F, BIAN F, REN S L, LIU Y M. Comparison of production performance and feeding value of six oat varieties at Tao river irrigation middle-area in Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.

    [25] 琚泽亮, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 贾志峰, 梁国玲. 不同燕麦品种在甘肃中部的营养价值及青贮发酵品质综合评价, 草业学报, 2019, 28 (9): 77-86.

    JU Z L, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K, JIA Z F, LIANG G L. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value and silage fermentation quality of of different oat varieties in central Gansu Province, Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28 (9): 77-86.

    [26] 王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 李峰, 于林清, 远婷, 梁潇, 周文秀. 冀西北地区 21 个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价, 草地学报, 2020, 28 (5): 1311-1318.

    WANG Y T, YANG Z M, LIU J C, LI F, YU L Q, YUAN T, LIANG X, ZHOU W X. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 21 oat varieties in northwest Hebei Province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 28 (5): 1311-1318.

    [27] 彭先琴, 周青平, 刘文辉, 魏小星, 田莉华, 陈有军, 王沛. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5): 1208-1217.

    PENG X Q, ZHOU Q P, LIU W H, WEI X X, TIAN L H, CHEN Y J, WANG P. A comparative analysis of growth characteristics of six oat cultivars in the north-west Sichuan Alpine Region. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5): 1208-1217.

    [28] 王国良, 吴波, 张进红, 姜慧新, 孙启忠. 黄河三角洲地区不同品种燕麦生产性能比较, 中国草地学报, 2020, 42 (6): 141-148.

    WANG G L, WU B, ZHANG J H, JIANG H X, SUN Q Z. The Comparison of production of different oat varieties in the Yellow River Delta, Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42 (6): 141-148.

    [29] 吴海艳, 曲珍, 刘昭明, 拉巴顿珠, 同桑措姆, 曲尼, 尼玛, 卓嘎, 马玉寿. 基于主成分分析的燕麦品种生产性能的比较研究, 草地学报, 2021, 29 (9): 1967-1973.

    WU H Y, QU Z, LIU Z M, Labadunzhu, Tongsangcuomu, QU N, NI M, ZHUO G, MA Y T. Comparative study on production performance of oat varieties based on principal component analysis, Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29 (9): 1967-1973.

    [30] 张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 王江伟, 沈振西, 付刚. 西藏河谷区 9 个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

    ZHANG G Y, MA H P, SHAO X M, WANG J W, SHEN Z X, FU G. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the valley region of Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 121-131.

    [31] 柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 燕麦种子产量构成因子与产量的关联性分析, 草地学报, 2012, 20 (1): 49-53.

    CHAI J K, ZHAO G Q, SHI S L. Association analysis between seed yield and yield components of oats. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20 (1): 49-53.

    [32] 张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳. 江淮地区燕麦籽粒产量与农艺性状的相关性及通径分析. 作物杂志, 2021(5): 146-152.

    ZHANG Q, WEI Z W, YAN T F. Correlation and path analysis of oat seed yield with agronomic characters in Jiang-Huai area. Crops, 2021(5): 146-152.

    [33] 郭兴燕, 梁丹妮, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区燕麦品种生产性能及营养价值研究. 作物杂志, 2016(4): 105-111.

    GUO X Y, LIANG D N, LAN J. Research on productive performance and nutritive value of 11 oat varieties in Ningxia irrigation area. Crops, 2016(4): 105-111.

    [34] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 20份饲草型燕麦品种的抗倒伏性研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(5): 62-68.

    NAN M, ZHAO G Q, CHAI J K. Study on lodging resistance of 20 forage oat (Avena sativa) varieties. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(5): 62-68.

    [35] 胡凯军. 抗红叶病燕麦种质评价与筛选. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2010.

    Hu Kaijun. Evaluation and screening of Oat germplasm resistant to red leaf disease. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2010.

    [36] 赵峰, 郭满库, 郭成, 尚新新, 赵志鹏, 赵桂琴. 213份燕麦种质的白粉病抗性评价. 草业科学, 2017, 34(2): 331-338.

    ZHAO F, GUO M K, GUO C, SHANG X X, ZHAO Z P, ZHAO G Q. Powdery mildew resistance evaluation of 213 oat germplasm resistance powdery mildew. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(2): 331-338.

    [37] 郭斌, 郭满库, 郭成, 尚新新, 赵志鹏, 赵桂琴. 燕麦种质资源抗白粉病鉴定及利用评价. 植物保护, 2012, 38(4): 144-146.

    GUO B, GUO M K, GUO C, SHANG X X, ZHAO Z P, ZHAO G Q. Identification and evaluation of oat germplasm resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Protection, 2012, 38(4): 144-146.

    [38] 孙浩洋, 赵桂琴, 张建贵, 李鑫, 杨琰珊, 柴继宽, 曾亮, 焦润安, 金小雯, 黎蓉, 宫文龙. 甘肃省燕麦主产区白粉病调查及病原鉴定. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.

    SUN H Y, ZHAO G Q, ZHANG J G, LI X, YANG Y S, CHAI J K, ZENG L, JIAO R A, JIN X W, LI R, GONG W L. Incidence of oat powdery mildew and pathogen identification in the main oat production areas of Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.

    [39] 周青平, 颜红波, 梁国玲, 贾志峰, 刘文辉, 田莉华, 陈有军, 陈仕勇. 不同燕麦品种饲草和籽粒生产性能分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.

    ZHOU Q P, YAN H B, LIANG G L, JIA Z F, LIU W H, TIAN L H, CHEN Y J, CHEN S Y. Analysis of the forage and grain productivity of oat cultivars. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 120-130.

    [40] 姜慧新, 柏杉杉, 吴波, 宋静怡, 王国良. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 140-149.

    JIANG H X, BAI S S, WU B, SONG J Y, WANG G L. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic straits and forage quality of 22 oat varieties in the Huang−Huai−Hai area of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 140-149.

图(2)  /  表(7)
计量
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 文章访问数:  84
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
文章相关
  • 通讯作者: 景芳
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-09
  • 接受日期:  2023-05-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-07
  • 刊出日期:  2024-05-14

目录

/

返回文章
返回