欢迎访问 草业科学,今天是2025年4月12日 星期六!

刈割对一年生短生草雀麦生长和繁殖的影响

严佳玥, 张博, 魏岩

严佳玥,张博,魏岩. 刈割对一年生短生草雀麦生长和繁殖的影响. 草业科学, 2023, 40(5): 1343-1348 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0631
引用本文: 严佳玥,张博,魏岩. 刈割对一年生短生草雀麦生长和繁殖的影响. 草业科学, 2023, 40(5): 1343-1348 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0631
YAN J Y, ZHANG B, WEI Y. Effects of defoliation on growth and reproduction in the short-lived annual plant . Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(5): 1343-1348 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0631
Citation: YAN J Y, ZHANG B, WEI Y. Effects of defoliation on growth and reproduction in the short-lived annual plant . Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(5): 1343-1348 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0631

刈割对一年生短生草雀麦生长和繁殖的影响

基金项目: 国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS34);国家自然科学基金(31560113)
摘要: 雀麦(Bromus japonicas )为一年生短生草,是准噶尔荒漠早春优质牧草。对雀麦自然种群物候进行观测,在拔节期设置两个刈割高度,分别为2.5 cm (矮,S)和7.6 cm (高,T),研究不同刈割强度对雀麦植物生长和繁殖的影响。结果表明:1)刈割降低了植株高度、旗叶长度、生物量和总生物量;T处理和S处理植株的高度分别比对照降低了28.2%和40.1%,生物量比对照降低了29.9%和60.6%。2)刈割显著降低了雀麦果穗的长度、小穂的数目、果实数目和果实的重量;随着刈割强度的增加,雀麦果穗的长度、果实数目和果实重量显著降低;T处理和S处理果穗的长度分别比对照降低了29.1%和41.6%、果实数目分别降低了54.5%和71.7%。3)刈割后雀麦的果实重、果实数目、生物量和总生物量的补偿指数均显著小于1,补偿生长模式为不足补偿;S处理的补偿生长能力显著小于T处理。研究结果对于揭示短命植物的补偿生长模式以及雀麦资源的合理利用提供科学数据。

 

English

  • [1]

    BALSKY A J. Dose herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. American Naturalist, 1986, 127: 870-892.

    [2] 杨允菲, 祝廷成. 羊草种群种子生产的初步研究. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1989, 13(1): 73-78.

    YANG Y F, ZHU T C. A preliminary study of seed production of Aneurolepidium chinense population. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1989, 13(1): 73-78.

    [3] 张晓娜, 哈达朝鲁, 潘庆民. 刈割干扰下内蒙古草原两种丛生禾草繁殖策略的适应性调节. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(3): 253-262. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.03.002

    ZHANG X N, Hadachaolu, PAN Q M. Adaptive regulation in reproductive strategy of two bunchgrasses under mowing disturbance in Inner Mongolia grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(3): 253-262. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.03.002

    [4]

    KENNETT G A, LACEY J R, BUTT C A, OLSONRUTZ K M, HAFERKAMP M R. Effects of defoliation shading and competition spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. Journal of Range Management, 1992, 45(4): 363-369. doi: 10.2307/4003084

    [5]

    KHAIR M J, SHATNAWI E L, GHOSHEH H, SHANNAG H, KHALIL I E. Defoliation time and intensity of wall barley in the Mediterranean rangeland. Journal of Range Management, 1999, 52(3): 258-262. doi: 10.2307/4003688

    [6] 雷抒情, 汪海洋, 杜国帧, 潘声旺. 刈割后两种不同体型植物的补偿式样对比研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5): 740-747. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.05.006

    LEI S Q, WANG H Y, DU G Z, PAN S W. Compensatory growth responses of two plants with different growth forms after clipping. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29(5): 740-747. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.05.006

    [7] 鲍雅静, 李政海, 仲延凯, 杨持. 不同频次刈割对内蒙古羊草草原群落能量固定与分配规律的影响. 草业学报, 2004, 13(5): 46-52. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2004.05.008

    BAO Y J, LI Z H, ZHONG Y K, YANG C. The effects of different frequency mowing on energy fixation and allocation of Leymus chinensis steppe community in Xilinguole, NeiMonggol. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(5): 46-52. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2004.05.008

    [8] 中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司, 全国畜牧兽医总站. 中国草地资源. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1996.

    Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, National Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station. Grassland Resources in China. Beijing: Science and Technology Press of China, 1996.

    [9] 毛祖美. 早春短命植物区系特点. 干旱区研究, 1992, 9(1): 11-12. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.1992.01.004

    MAO Z M. Floristic characteristics of early spring ephemeral. Arid Zone Research, 1992, 9(1): 11-12. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.1992.01.004

    [10] 胡汝骥. 中国天山自然地理. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2004.

    HU R J. Physical Geography of Tianshan Mountains in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. 2004.

    [11]

    HEMPY-MAYER K, PYKE D A. Defoliation effects on Bromus tectorum seed production: Implications for grazing. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2008, 61(1): 116-123.

    [12] 王海洋, 杜国帧, 任金吉. 种群密度和施肥对垂穗披碱草刈割后补偿作用的影响. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 477-483. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2003.04.008

    WANG H Y, DU G Z, REN J J. The impacts of population density and fertilization on compensatory responses of Elymus nutans to mowing. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(4): 477-483. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2003.04.008

    [13]

    SILVERTOWN J, CHARLESWORTH D. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.

    [14]

    CHEN X D, ZHAO B, CHEN L, WANG R, JI C H. Defoliation enhances green forage performance but inhibits grainy yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Experimental Agriculture, 2016, 52(3): 391-404. doi: 10.1017/S0014479715000162

    [15]

    SEYMOUR M, ENGLAND J M, MALIK R, ROGERS D, SUTHERLAND A, RANDELL A. Effect of timing and height of defoliation on the grainy yield of barley, wheat, oats and canola in western Australia. Crop & Pasture Science, 2015, 66: 287-300.

    [16] 廖伟彪, 南志标, 张美玲. 刈割对禾草生长的影响. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(5): 95-105.

    LIAO W B, NAN Z B, ZHANG M L. Effects of cutting on grass growth. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(5): 95-105.

    [17]

    KING D, ROUGHGARDEN J. Energy allocation patterns of the California grassland annuals Plantago erecta and Clarkia rubicunda. Ecology, 1983, 64: 16-24. doi: 10.2307/1937324

    [18]

    THOMPSON B K, WEINER J, WARWICK S I. Size-dependent reproductive output in agricultural weeds. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1991, 69: 442-446. doi: 10.1139/b91-061

    [19]

    SUSKO D J, LOVETT-DOUST L. Plant-size and fruit-position effects on reproductive allocation in Alliaria petiolate (Brassicaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 2000, 78: 1398-1407.

    [20] 刘建秀, 朱志红, 郑伟. 高寒草甸放牧扰动与两种植物的反应研究. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(10): 2043-2047. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.10.019

    LIU J X, ZHU Z H, ZHENG W. Reponses of two plant species to grazing practice in alpine and cold meadow under grazing and grazing-suspension. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2005, 25(10): 2043-2047. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.10.019

    [21]

    PAIGE K N, WHITHAM T C. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: The advantage of being eaten. American Naturalist, 1987, 129: 407-416. doi: 10.1086/284645

    [22] 张璐璐, 周晓松, 李英年, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭, 朱志红. 刈割、施肥和浇水对矮嵩草补偿生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 641-652. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00641

    ZHANG L L, ZHOU X S, LI Y N, YUAN F R, FAN R J, ZHU ZH. Effects of clipping, fertilizing and watering on compensatory growth of Kobresia humilis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(6): 641-652. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00641

    [23] 孙毅, 闫帮国, 何光熊, 张梦寅, 和润莲, 史亮涛. 水分和养分添加对扭黄茅刈割后补偿作用的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(1): 200-209.

    SUN Y, YAN B G, HE G X, ZHANG M Y, HE R L, SHI L T. Effect of mowing and water and nutrient additions on the compensatory responses of Heteropogon contortus. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(1): 200-209.

  • 图  1   刈割对雀麦植株生长的影响

    不同小写字母表示不同刈割高度处理间差异显著(P < 0.05);T、S和CK分别表示刈割高度为7.6 和2.5 cm以及不刈割。下同。

    Figure  1.   Effect of different clipping treatments on Bromus japonicas

    Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different clipping height treatments at the 0.05 level; T, S, and CK indicate the height of clipping were 7.6 and 2.5 cm, and not clippling. This is applicable for the following figures and tables as well.

    图  2   刈割对雀麦繁殖的影响

    Figure  2.   Effect of different clipping treatments on the rate reproduction of Bromus japonicas number of fruits, fruit weight

    表  1   刈割对雀麦茎生叶完整度的影响

    Table  1   Effect of different clipping treatments on leaf integrity of Bromus japonicas

    处理
    Treatment
    旗叶
    Flag leaf
    倒2叶
    Top 2nd leaf
    倒3叶
    Top 3rd leaf
    倒4叶
    Top 4th leaf
    倒5叶
    Top 5th leaf
    倒6叶
    Top 6th leaf
    CK 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a
    T 100 ± 0a 100 ± 0a 0b 0b 65 ± 12b 100 ± 0a
    S 100 ± 0a 65 ± 32b 0b 0b 19 ± 23c 76 ± 34b
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   刈割处理与对照之间植物各指标的补偿指数

    Table  2   Compensation index of Bromus japonicas between CK and the different clipping treatments

    刈割/对照
    Clipping/control
    果实重
    Fruit weight
    果实数
    No. of fruit
    生物量
    Biomass
    总生物量
    Total biomass
    S/CK0.226 ± 0.071c0.284 ± 0.023c0.395 ± 0.027c0.452 ± 0026c
    T/CK0.481 ± 0.214b0.452 ± 0.076b0.702 ± 0.030b0.725 ± 0.029b
    CK/CK1.000 ± 0.000a1.000 ± 0.000a1.000 ± 0.000a1.000 ± 0.000a
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    BALSKY A J. Dose herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. American Naturalist, 1986, 127: 870-892.

    [2] 杨允菲, 祝廷成. 羊草种群种子生产的初步研究. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1989, 13(1): 73-78.

    YANG Y F, ZHU T C. A preliminary study of seed production of Aneurolepidium chinense population. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1989, 13(1): 73-78.

    [3] 张晓娜, 哈达朝鲁, 潘庆民. 刈割干扰下内蒙古草原两种丛生禾草繁殖策略的适应性调节. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(3): 253-262. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.03.002

    ZHANG X N, Hadachaolu, PAN Q M. Adaptive regulation in reproductive strategy of two bunchgrasses under mowing disturbance in Inner Mongolia grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(3): 253-262. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.03.002

    [4]

    KENNETT G A, LACEY J R, BUTT C A, OLSONRUTZ K M, HAFERKAMP M R. Effects of defoliation shading and competition spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. Journal of Range Management, 1992, 45(4): 363-369. doi: 10.2307/4003084

    [5]

    KHAIR M J, SHATNAWI E L, GHOSHEH H, SHANNAG H, KHALIL I E. Defoliation time and intensity of wall barley in the Mediterranean rangeland. Journal of Range Management, 1999, 52(3): 258-262. doi: 10.2307/4003688

    [6] 雷抒情, 汪海洋, 杜国帧, 潘声旺. 刈割后两种不同体型植物的补偿式样对比研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5): 740-747. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.05.006

    LEI S Q, WANG H Y, DU G Z, PAN S W. Compensatory growth responses of two plants with different growth forms after clipping. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29(5): 740-747. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.05.006

    [7] 鲍雅静, 李政海, 仲延凯, 杨持. 不同频次刈割对内蒙古羊草草原群落能量固定与分配规律的影响. 草业学报, 2004, 13(5): 46-52. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2004.05.008

    BAO Y J, LI Z H, ZHONG Y K, YANG C. The effects of different frequency mowing on energy fixation and allocation of Leymus chinensis steppe community in Xilinguole, NeiMonggol. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(5): 46-52. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2004.05.008

    [8] 中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司, 全国畜牧兽医总站. 中国草地资源. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1996.

    Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, National Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station. Grassland Resources in China. Beijing: Science and Technology Press of China, 1996.

    [9] 毛祖美. 早春短命植物区系特点. 干旱区研究, 1992, 9(1): 11-12. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.1992.01.004

    MAO Z M. Floristic characteristics of early spring ephemeral. Arid Zone Research, 1992, 9(1): 11-12. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.1992.01.004

    [10] 胡汝骥. 中国天山自然地理. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2004.

    HU R J. Physical Geography of Tianshan Mountains in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. 2004.

    [11]

    HEMPY-MAYER K, PYKE D A. Defoliation effects on Bromus tectorum seed production: Implications for grazing. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2008, 61(1): 116-123.

    [12] 王海洋, 杜国帧, 任金吉. 种群密度和施肥对垂穗披碱草刈割后补偿作用的影响. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 477-483. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2003.04.008

    WANG H Y, DU G Z, REN J J. The impacts of population density and fertilization on compensatory responses of Elymus nutans to mowing. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(4): 477-483. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2003.04.008

    [13]

    SILVERTOWN J, CHARLESWORTH D. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.

    [14]

    CHEN X D, ZHAO B, CHEN L, WANG R, JI C H. Defoliation enhances green forage performance but inhibits grainy yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Experimental Agriculture, 2016, 52(3): 391-404. doi: 10.1017/S0014479715000162

    [15]

    SEYMOUR M, ENGLAND J M, MALIK R, ROGERS D, SUTHERLAND A, RANDELL A. Effect of timing and height of defoliation on the grainy yield of barley, wheat, oats and canola in western Australia. Crop & Pasture Science, 2015, 66: 287-300.

    [16] 廖伟彪, 南志标, 张美玲. 刈割对禾草生长的影响. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(5): 95-105.

    LIAO W B, NAN Z B, ZHANG M L. Effects of cutting on grass growth. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(5): 95-105.

    [17]

    KING D, ROUGHGARDEN J. Energy allocation patterns of the California grassland annuals Plantago erecta and Clarkia rubicunda. Ecology, 1983, 64: 16-24. doi: 10.2307/1937324

    [18]

    THOMPSON B K, WEINER J, WARWICK S I. Size-dependent reproductive output in agricultural weeds. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1991, 69: 442-446. doi: 10.1139/b91-061

    [19]

    SUSKO D J, LOVETT-DOUST L. Plant-size and fruit-position effects on reproductive allocation in Alliaria petiolate (Brassicaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 2000, 78: 1398-1407.

    [20] 刘建秀, 朱志红, 郑伟. 高寒草甸放牧扰动与两种植物的反应研究. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(10): 2043-2047. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.10.019

    LIU J X, ZHU Z H, ZHENG W. Reponses of two plant species to grazing practice in alpine and cold meadow under grazing and grazing-suspension. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2005, 25(10): 2043-2047. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.10.019

    [21]

    PAIGE K N, WHITHAM T C. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: The advantage of being eaten. American Naturalist, 1987, 129: 407-416. doi: 10.1086/284645

    [22] 张璐璐, 周晓松, 李英年, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭, 朱志红. 刈割、施肥和浇水对矮嵩草补偿生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 641-652. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00641

    ZHANG L L, ZHOU X S, LI Y N, YUAN F R, FAN R J, ZHU ZH. Effects of clipping, fertilizing and watering on compensatory growth of Kobresia humilis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(6): 641-652. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00641

    [23] 孙毅, 闫帮国, 何光熊, 张梦寅, 和润莲, 史亮涛. 水分和养分添加对扭黄茅刈割后补偿作用的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(1): 200-209.

    SUN Y, YAN B G, HE G X, ZHANG M Y, HE R L, SHI L T. Effect of mowing and water and nutrient additions on the compensatory responses of Heteropogon contortus. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(1): 200-209.

图(2)  /  表(2)
计量
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 文章访问数:  594
  • HTML全文浏览量:  465
  • 被引次数: 0
文章相关
  • 通讯作者: 张博
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-07
  • 接受日期:  2023-02-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-12
  • 发布日期:  2023-05-14

目录

/

返回文章
返回