东乌珠穆沁旗牧户草地流转中的转入行为
English
-
参考文献
[1] 黄学谦. 改革开放是中国农村经济发展的强劲动力. 经济研究导刊, 2009(9): 37-38. HUANG X Q. Reform and opening up is a strong driving force for the development of China’s rural economy. Economic Research Herald, 2009(9): 37-38.
[2] 许月明. 土地家庭承包经营制度绩效与创新研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 2006. XU Y M. Research on the performance and innovation of land household contract management system. PhD Thesis. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2006.
[3] 梁伟. 土地细碎化县域治理: 体系构建与实践机制. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(2): 36-45. LIANG W. County governance of land fragmentation: System construction and practice mechanism. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Social Science Edition), 2022(2): 36-45.
[4] 张一洲. 乡村振兴战略背景下农村闲置土地的盘活与利用. 经济研究导刊, 2021(34): 39-41. ZHANG Y Z. Revitalization and utilization of idle rural land under the background of rural revitalization strategy. Economic Research Herald, 2021(34): 39-41.
[5] 王学书. 农村土地撂荒问题的成因与对策. 中国乡村发现, 2019(1): 93-97. WANG X S. Causes and countermeasures of rural land abandonment. China Rural Discovery, 2019(1): 93-97.
[6] 许经勇. 理顺农民与土地关系是深化农村改革主线. 湖湘论坛, 2021(6): 119-128. XU J Y. Rationalizing the relationship between farmers and land is the main line of deepening rural reform. Hunan BBS, 2021(6): 119-128.
[7] 程漱兰, 李爽. 新中国农村集体土地制度形成和演进的历史逻辑以及若干热点问题探究. 中国农村观察, 2022(3): 19-31. CHENG S L, LI S. Research on the historical logic of the formation and evolution of rural collective land system in new China and some hot issues. China Rural Observation, 2022(3): 19-31.
[8] 邹宝玲, 彭素. 中国农村土地制度变迁、权能拓展与共同富裕. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(4): 79-89. ZOU B L, PENG S. Rural land system Change, power expansion and common prosperity in China. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022(4): 79-89.
[9] 刘润秋, 姜力月. “变”与“不变”: 中国共产党领导农村土地制度百年变革的向度探析. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2022(5): 18-28. LIU R Q, JIANG L Y. "Change" and "Unchanged": An analysis of the direction of the hundred-year reform of rural land system under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. Fujian Forum (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2022(5): 18-28.
[10] 王海娟, 胡守庚. 土地细碎化与土地流转市场的优化路径研究. 学术研究, 2019(7): 45-52, 177. WANG H J, HU S G. Study on the optimization path of land fragmentation and land transfer market. Academic Research, 2019(7): 45-52, 177.
[11] 王余丁, 袁青川, 席增雷. 基于排序Logit模型的土地流转供给、需求收益实证研究: 来自2014年河北11个地级市的农户经验数据. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(6): 44-49. WANG Y D, YUAN Q C, XI Z L. Empirical study on land transfer supply and demand returns based on ranked Logit Model: Empirical data of farmers from 11 prefecture-level cities in Hebei Province in 2014. Agricultural Resources and Regionalization in China, 2016, 37(6): 44-49.
[12] 张勇. 城乡发展一体化进程中的制度供给与农民需求: 基于湖北省鄂州市土地流转调查的实证分析. 学习与实践, 2013(12): 87-97. ZHANG Y. Institutional supply and farmers’ demand in the process of urban-rural integration: An empirical analysis based on land transfer survey in Ezhou City, Hubei Province. Study and Practice, 2013(12): 87-97.
[13] 张引弟, 孟慧君, 塔娜. 牧区草地承包经营权流转及其对牧民生计的影响: 以内蒙古草原牧区为例. 草业科学, 2010, 27(5): 130-135. ZHANG Y D, MENG H J, Tana. Transfer of contracted management right of grassland and its impact on the livelihood of herdsmen: A case study of Inner Mongolia Grassland Pastoral area. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(5): 130-135.
[14] 萨茹拉, 丁勇, 侯向阳. 北方草原区气候变化影响与适应. 中国草地学报, 2018, 40(2): 109-115. Sarula, DING Y, HOU X Y. Climate change impacts and adaptation in the northern steppe region. Chinese Journal of Grassland Science, 2018, 40(2): 109-115.
[15] 杨理. 草原治理: 如何进一步完善草原家庭承包制. 中国农村经济, 2007(12): 62-67. YANG L. Grassland governance: How to further improve the Grassland household contract System. China’s Rural Economy, 2007(12): 62-67.
[16] 李先东, 米巧, 李录堂, 高松. 增收与生态保护: 双重保障型草地市场化流转机制探析. 生态经济, 2019, 35(9): 128-132. LI X D, MI Q, LI L T, GAO S. Income increase and ecological protection: A study on the market circulation mechanism of Dual Security grassland. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(9): 128-132.
[17] 秦昌胜, 武延琴, 李芙凝, 周雪, 唐增. 草地流转对牧民家庭收入的影响: 基于PSM方法的实证分析. 草业科学, 2021, 38(10): 2087-2095. QIN C S, WU Y Q, LI F N, ZHOU X, TANG Z. Effect of grassland circulation on household income of herdsmen: An empirical analysis based on PSM method. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(10): 2087-2095.
[18] 高玉琪, 扁芙蓉, 吴迪, 刘兴元. 草地农业适度规模经营研究进展. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(6): 112-119. GAO Y Q, BIAN F R, WU D, LIU X Y. Research progress on moderate scale management of grassland agriculture. Agricultural Resources and Regionalization in China, 2022, 43(6): 112-119.
[19] 张立中, 高芬, 周杰. 草原确权是否提高了牧民产权安全认知?: 基于不同类型牧户的异质性分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(2): 61-67. ZHANG L Z, GAO F, ZHOU J. Does grassland right confirmation improve herdsmen’s cognition of property right security? Heterogeneity analysis based on different types of herdsmen. Resources and Environment in Arid Areas, 2022, 36(2): 61-67.
[20] 赵颖, 赵珩, Peter Ho. 产权视角下的草原家庭承包制. 草业科学, 2017, 34(3): 635-643. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0546 ZHAO Y, ZHAO H, PETER H. Grassland household contracting system from the perspective of property rights. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(3): 635-643. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0546
[21] 潘建伟, 张立中, 辛国昌. 草原生态补助奖励政策效益评估: 基于内蒙古呼伦贝尔新巴尔虎右旗的调查. 农业经济问题, 2020(9): 111-121. PAN J W, ZHANG L Z, XIN G C. Evaluation of the benefits of grassland ecological subsidy incentive policy: A survey based on the investigation of New Barag Right Banner in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia. Issues in Agricultural Economics, 2020(9): 111-121.
[22] 王晓毅, 张倩, 荀丽丽, 张浩. 贫困影响评价与资源利用: 以草原奖补政策和土地流转为例. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 33(5): 119-128. WANG X Y, ZHANG Q, XUN L L, ZHANG H. Poverty impact assessment and resource utilization: A case study of grassland incentive compensation policy and land circulation. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2016, 33(5): 119-128.
[23] 张正河, 张晓敏. 生态约束下牧户草地规模经营研究. 农业技术经济, 2015(6): 82-90. ZHANG Z H, ZHANG X M. A study on the large-scale management of herders under ecological constraints. Agricultural Technical Economics, 2015(6): 82-90.
[24] 杜富林, 张亚茜, 宋良媛. 草原畜牧业经营主体生产效率的比较研究: 基于锡林郭勒盟入户调查数据. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 46(4): 88-96. DU F L, ZHANG Y X, SONG L Y. Comparative study on production efficiency of grassland animal husbandry operators: Based on household survey data of Xilingol League. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019, 46(4): 88-96.
[25] 刘利珍, 张树军. 浅析草原承包经营权流转问题. 人民论坛, 2016(2): 82-84. LIU L Z, ZHANG S J. A brief analysis of the transfer of grassland contracted management rights. People’s BBS, 2016(2): 82-84.
[26] 李静, 孟梅. 新疆牧户人工牧草地流转意愿影响因素分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(3): 51-56. LI J, MENG M. Analysis of influencing factors influencing the circulation willingness of herdsmen in artificial pasture and grassland in Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(3): 51-56.
[27] 刘慧慧, 丁文强, 白荣, 尹燕亭, 侯向阳. 内蒙古地区牧户草地流转意愿影响因素研究. 家畜生态学报, 2021, 42(8): 64-69. LIU H H, DING W Q, BAI R, YIN Y T, HOU X Y. A study on the influencing factors of grassland turnover willingness of herders in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Livestock Ecology, 2021, 42(8): 64-69.
[28] 赖玉珮, 李文军. 草场流转对干旱半干旱地区草原生态和牧民生计影响研究: 以呼伦贝尔市新巴尔虎右旗M嘎查为例. 资源科学, 2012, 34(6): 1039-1048. LAI Y P, LI W J. A study on the influence of grassland circulation on grassland ecology and pastoral livelihood in arid and semi-arid areas: A case study of M Gacha, New Barag Right Banner, Hulunbuir City. Resources Science, 2012, 34(6): 1039-1048.
[29] 穆钰, 姹苏, 李文军. 草场流转对牧民生计和草原生态保护的影响分析: 基于锡林郭勒盟镶黄旗的案例研究. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(11): 84-96. MU Y, CHA S, LI W J. An analysis on the influence of grassland circulation on pastoral livelihood and grassland ecological protection: Based on the case study of Xianghuang Banner in Xilingol League. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(11): 84-96.
[30] DU F L, LIU Z J, SHUN J O. Factors affecting herdsmen’s grassland transfer in Inner Mongolia, China. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 2017, 51(3): 259-269. doi: 10.6090/jarq.51.259
[31] 马文芳, 孟梅, 唐洪松, 李静. 福海县牧民牧草地流转行为影响因素研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(8): 89-96. MA W F, MENG M, TANG H S, LI J. A study on the influencing factors of pastoral and grassland circulation behavior of herders in Fuhai County. China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(8): 89-96.
[32] 张小蕾, 樊文涛, 赵振媛, 李国梅, 杨东知, 唐增. 青藏高原牧户草地转入行为的影响因素分析: 基于495户牧民的调查. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(5): 128-133. ZHANG X L, FAN W T, ZHAO Z Y, LI G M, YANG D Z, TANG Z. Analysis of influencing factors of grassland transition behavior of herders on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Based on a survey of 495 herders. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(5): 128-133.
[33] 张美艳, 董建军, 辛姝玉, 赵达君, 张立中. 锡林郭勒盟草原流转牧户的技术效率研究: 基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(11): 62-68. ZHANG M Y, DONG J J, XIN Z Y, ZHAO D J, ZHANG L Z. Study on technical efficiency of shifting herders in Xilingol League grassland: Based on DEA-Tobit model. Resources and Environment in Arid Areas, 2017, 31(11): 62-68.
[34] 冯晓龙, 苏柳方, 唐建军. 草场流转备案、流转范围规制与牧户超载过牧行为. 农业技术经济, 2021(12): 4-16. FENG X L, SU L F, TANG J J. Record of grassland circulation regulation of circulation range and overgrazing behavior of herdsmen. Technical Economy of Agriculture, 2021(12): 4-16.
-
表 1 牧户及家庭基本特征
Table 1 Basic characteristics of the herdsmen and families
类型
Type项目
Item人数
Number占比
Proportion/%户主的性别
Gender of the
head of
household男 Male 210 92.92 女 Female 16 7.08 户主的学历
Education of
the household
head小学
Elementary school69 30.53 初中
Junior high school83 36.73 高中 High school 56 24.78 大专及以上
College degree or above18 7.94 家庭成员数
Number
of family
members2~4 174 77.00 5~7 52 23.00 家庭性质
Family
nature纯牧业户
Pure herding households163 72.12 兼业户
Part-time households49 21.68 非牧业户
Non-pastoral households14 6.19 牲畜头数
Number of
heads of
livestock400头以下
Less than 400 heads128 56.64 400~700头
400~700 heads83 36.73 700~1 000头
700~1 000 heads10 4.42 1 000头以上
More than 1 000 heads5 2.21 表 2 模型各解释变量的赋值及其分布情况
Table 2 The assignment and distribution of each explanatory variable in the model
牧户特征
Characteristics of
pastoral households变量名称
Variable name变量赋值及说明
Variable assignment
and description均值
Mean方差
Variance个人特征
Characteristics
of the herdsmen性别(男)
Gender (male)是 = 1;否 = 0
Yes = 1; No = 00.93 0.07 受教育程度
Educational attainment小学 = 1;初中 = 2;高中 = 3;大专及以上 = 4
Elementary school = 1; Junior high school = 2; High school = 3;
College degree or above = 42.10 0.87 年龄 Age 18~30岁 = 1;31~40岁 = 2;41~50岁 = 3;51岁及其以上 = 4
18~30 years old = 1; 31~40 years old = 2; 41~50 years old = 3;
51 years old and above = 42.51 0.43 家庭特征
Family
characteristics家庭成员数
Number of family members连续变量
Continuous variables3.77 1.18 是否兼业户
Whether a part-time household是 = 1;否 = 0
Yes = 1; No = 00.28 0.20 家庭年收入
Annual household income10万~25万 = 1;25万~40万 = 2;40万~55万 = 3;
55万~70万 = 4;70万及其以上 = 5
10~25 million = 1; 25~40 million = 2; 40~55 million = 3;
55~70 million = 4; 70 million and above = 51.62 0.79 牲畜收入所占比重
Proportion of livestock income家庭总收入中牲畜收入占比,连续变量
Proportion of livestock income in total household
income, continuous variables0.67 0.03 资源特征
Resource
characteristics家庭劳动力数量
Number of household laborers连续变量
Continuous variables3.38 0.95 承包草地面积
Contracted grassland area连续变量
Continuous variables384.81 27 149.21 农牧业机械数量
Pieces of agricultural and
animal husbandry machinery拖拉机 + 打草机 + 捆草机 + 卡车 + 铲车 + 皮卡 +
摩托车 + 拉水车,连续变量
Tractor + grass trimmer + bundle of grass machine +
truck + forklift + pickup truck + the motorcycle +
water truck, continuous variables0.97 1.16 牲畜养殖结构
Livestock breeding structure牛 + 羊 + 马,连续变量
Cow + sheep + horse, continuous variables1.81 0.44 牧户草地特征
Grassland
characteristics
of herdsmen草地片数
Number of grassland blocks连续变量
Continuous variables2.36 0.55 草地生态状况
Ecological status of grasslands好 = 1;一般 = 2;差 = 3
Good = 1; Average = 2; Poor = 32.13 0.27 水源是否充足
Whether the water source is sufficient是 = 1;否 = 0
Yes = 1; No = 00.65 0.23 草地载畜量
Livestock capacity of grassland每公顷草地上能够养殖的羊单位数,连续变量
The number of sheep units that can be raised per hectare
of grassland, Continuous variables206.1 17.4 自然灾害数
Number of natural disasters虫灾 + 雹灾 + 雪灾 + 旱灾,连续变量
Pests + hailstorm + snow + drought,continuous variables1.93 0.32 表 3 牧户草地转入行为特征
Table 3 Pastoral grassland turn behavioral characteristics
类型
Type样本数据
Sample data数量
Quantity占比
Proportion/%牧户数
Number of herdsmen转出草地牧户 Turn out of the meadow herdsmen 58 25.66 转入草地牧户 Transfer to grassland herdsmen 168 74.34 草地流转面积
Area of grassland circulation/hm2转出草地面积 Turn out the grass area 14 886.55 17.71 转入草地面积 Conversion to grassland area 69 178.07 82.29 不同流转方式的草地流转面积
Grassland circulation area with
different circulation methods/hm2出租 Hire 8 096.73 9.63 转包 Subcontract 63 781.55 75.87 入股 Become a shareholder 12 186.34 14.50 不同流转模式的草地流转面积
Grassland circulation area with different
circulation patterns/hm2分散牧户流转模式 Decentralized pastoral circulation model 50 192.95 60.00 家庭牧场流转模式 Family ranch circulation model 20 445.33 24.00 合作社流转模式 Cooperative circulation model 13 426.34 16.00 表 4 共线性检验结果
Table 4 Collinearity test results
变量
Variable容差
ToleranceVIF 户主性别(男) Head of household gender (male) 0.953 1.050 年龄 Age 0.414 2.415 受教育程度 Educational attainment 0.521 1.918 家庭成员数 Number of family members 0.148 6.772 是否兼业户 Whether part-time household 0.443 2.257 家庭年收入 Annual household income 0.182 5.502 牲畜收入比重 Share of livestock income 0.267 3.739 劳动力数量 Number of laborers 0.281 3.560 承包草地面积 Contracted grassland area 0.142 7.053 农牧业机械数量 Pieces of agricultural
and animal husbandry machinery0.853 1.172 牲畜养殖结构 Livestock breeding structure 0.814 1.229 草地片数 Number of grass patches 0.679 1.473 草地生态状况 Ecological status of grasslands 0.926 1.080 水源是否充足 Adequacy of water source 0.820 1.219 草地载畜量 Livestock capacity of grassland 0.526 1.902 自然灾害数 Number of natural disasters 0.795 1.258 表 5 牧户草地转入行为的影响因素模型结果
Table 5 Results of the model of influencing factors of herder’s grassland transition behavior
自变量
Independent variableβ 标准误差
Standard error瓦尔德
Wald自由度
dfsig Exp (β) 户主性别(男) Head of household gender (male) 2.664 1.826 2.127 1 0.145 14.347 年龄 Age −4.011 1.690 5.634 1 0.018** 0.018 受教育程度 Educational attainment 0.908 1.356 0.449 1 0.503 2.480 家庭成员数 Number of family members 2.191 1.390 2.483 1 0.115 8.940 是否兼业户 Whether part-time household −2.107 1.614 1.704 1 0.192 0.122 家庭年收入 Annual household income 2.500 1.471 2.888 1 0.089* 12.178 牲畜收入所占比重 Share of livestock income 43.401 12.589 11.885 1 0.001*** 7.060 劳动力数量 Number of laborers 1.392 1.140 1.489 1 0.222 4.021 承包草地面积 Contracted grassland area −0.003 0.001 9.275 1 0.002*** 0.997 农牧业机械数量 Pieces of agricultural and animal husbandry machinery 1.282 0.718 3.192 1 0.074* 3.604 牲畜养殖结构 Livestock breeding structure 0.730 1.010 0.522 1 0.470 2.076 草地片数 Number of pasture films −1.262 0.851 2.201 1 0.138 0.283 草地生态状况 Ecological status of grasslands −0.871 1.078 0.652 1 0.419 0.419 水源是否充足 Adequate water source 0.590 1.325 0.198 1 0.656 1.804 草地载畜量 Livestock capacity of grassland 5.250 1.632 10.355 1 0.001*** 190.655 自然灾害数 Number of natural disasters −0.456 1.050 0.188 1 0.664 0.634 常量 Constant −85.565 28.837 8.804 1 0.003 0.000 ***、**和*分别表示在0.01、0.05和0.1的显著水平。
***, **, and * indicate significance at the 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 levels, respectively.表 6 牧户草地转入规模的影响因素模型结果
Table 6 Results of the model of influencing factors of pastoral grassland transition scale
模型
Model未标准化系数
Coefficients are not standardized标准化系数
Normalized coefficientst Sig. β 标准误差
Standard errorBeta 常量 Constant 3.082 1.130 2.727 0.007 受教育程度 Educational attainment 1.180 0.296 0.275 3.984 0.000 牲畜养殖结构 Livestock breeding structure −1.838 0.454 −0.282 −4.052 0.000 水源是否充足 Adequate water source 1.605 0.551 0.204 2.913 0.004 农牧业机械数量 Pieces of agricultural
and animal husbandry machinery0.663 0.241 0.190 2.749 0.007 -
[1] 黄学谦. 改革开放是中国农村经济发展的强劲动力. 经济研究导刊, 2009(9): 37-38. HUANG X Q. Reform and opening up is a strong driving force for the development of China’s rural economy. Economic Research Herald, 2009(9): 37-38.
[2] 许月明. 土地家庭承包经营制度绩效与创新研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 2006. XU Y M. Research on the performance and innovation of land household contract management system. PhD Thesis. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2006.
[3] 梁伟. 土地细碎化县域治理: 体系构建与实践机制. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(2): 36-45. LIANG W. County governance of land fragmentation: System construction and practice mechanism. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Social Science Edition), 2022(2): 36-45.
[4] 张一洲. 乡村振兴战略背景下农村闲置土地的盘活与利用. 经济研究导刊, 2021(34): 39-41. ZHANG Y Z. Revitalization and utilization of idle rural land under the background of rural revitalization strategy. Economic Research Herald, 2021(34): 39-41.
[5] 王学书. 农村土地撂荒问题的成因与对策. 中国乡村发现, 2019(1): 93-97. WANG X S. Causes and countermeasures of rural land abandonment. China Rural Discovery, 2019(1): 93-97.
[6] 许经勇. 理顺农民与土地关系是深化农村改革主线. 湖湘论坛, 2021(6): 119-128. XU J Y. Rationalizing the relationship between farmers and land is the main line of deepening rural reform. Hunan BBS, 2021(6): 119-128.
[7] 程漱兰, 李爽. 新中国农村集体土地制度形成和演进的历史逻辑以及若干热点问题探究. 中国农村观察, 2022(3): 19-31. CHENG S L, LI S. Research on the historical logic of the formation and evolution of rural collective land system in new China and some hot issues. China Rural Observation, 2022(3): 19-31.
[8] 邹宝玲, 彭素. 中国农村土地制度变迁、权能拓展与共同富裕. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(4): 79-89. ZOU B L, PENG S. Rural land system Change, power expansion and common prosperity in China. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022(4): 79-89.
[9] 刘润秋, 姜力月. “变”与“不变”: 中国共产党领导农村土地制度百年变革的向度探析. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2022(5): 18-28. LIU R Q, JIANG L Y. "Change" and "Unchanged": An analysis of the direction of the hundred-year reform of rural land system under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. Fujian Forum (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2022(5): 18-28.
[10] 王海娟, 胡守庚. 土地细碎化与土地流转市场的优化路径研究. 学术研究, 2019(7): 45-52, 177. WANG H J, HU S G. Study on the optimization path of land fragmentation and land transfer market. Academic Research, 2019(7): 45-52, 177.
[11] 王余丁, 袁青川, 席增雷. 基于排序Logit模型的土地流转供给、需求收益实证研究: 来自2014年河北11个地级市的农户经验数据. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(6): 44-49. WANG Y D, YUAN Q C, XI Z L. Empirical study on land transfer supply and demand returns based on ranked Logit Model: Empirical data of farmers from 11 prefecture-level cities in Hebei Province in 2014. Agricultural Resources and Regionalization in China, 2016, 37(6): 44-49.
[12] 张勇. 城乡发展一体化进程中的制度供给与农民需求: 基于湖北省鄂州市土地流转调查的实证分析. 学习与实践, 2013(12): 87-97. ZHANG Y. Institutional supply and farmers’ demand in the process of urban-rural integration: An empirical analysis based on land transfer survey in Ezhou City, Hubei Province. Study and Practice, 2013(12): 87-97.
[13] 张引弟, 孟慧君, 塔娜. 牧区草地承包经营权流转及其对牧民生计的影响: 以内蒙古草原牧区为例. 草业科学, 2010, 27(5): 130-135. ZHANG Y D, MENG H J, Tana. Transfer of contracted management right of grassland and its impact on the livelihood of herdsmen: A case study of Inner Mongolia Grassland Pastoral area. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(5): 130-135.
[14] 萨茹拉, 丁勇, 侯向阳. 北方草原区气候变化影响与适应. 中国草地学报, 2018, 40(2): 109-115. Sarula, DING Y, HOU X Y. Climate change impacts and adaptation in the northern steppe region. Chinese Journal of Grassland Science, 2018, 40(2): 109-115.
[15] 杨理. 草原治理: 如何进一步完善草原家庭承包制. 中国农村经济, 2007(12): 62-67. YANG L. Grassland governance: How to further improve the Grassland household contract System. China’s Rural Economy, 2007(12): 62-67.
[16] 李先东, 米巧, 李录堂, 高松. 增收与生态保护: 双重保障型草地市场化流转机制探析. 生态经济, 2019, 35(9): 128-132. LI X D, MI Q, LI L T, GAO S. Income increase and ecological protection: A study on the market circulation mechanism of Dual Security grassland. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(9): 128-132.
[17] 秦昌胜, 武延琴, 李芙凝, 周雪, 唐增. 草地流转对牧民家庭收入的影响: 基于PSM方法的实证分析. 草业科学, 2021, 38(10): 2087-2095. QIN C S, WU Y Q, LI F N, ZHOU X, TANG Z. Effect of grassland circulation on household income of herdsmen: An empirical analysis based on PSM method. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(10): 2087-2095.
[18] 高玉琪, 扁芙蓉, 吴迪, 刘兴元. 草地农业适度规模经营研究进展. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(6): 112-119. GAO Y Q, BIAN F R, WU D, LIU X Y. Research progress on moderate scale management of grassland agriculture. Agricultural Resources and Regionalization in China, 2022, 43(6): 112-119.
[19] 张立中, 高芬, 周杰. 草原确权是否提高了牧民产权安全认知?: 基于不同类型牧户的异质性分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(2): 61-67. ZHANG L Z, GAO F, ZHOU J. Does grassland right confirmation improve herdsmen’s cognition of property right security? Heterogeneity analysis based on different types of herdsmen. Resources and Environment in Arid Areas, 2022, 36(2): 61-67.
[20] 赵颖, 赵珩, Peter Ho. 产权视角下的草原家庭承包制. 草业科学, 2017, 34(3): 635-643. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0546 ZHAO Y, ZHAO H, PETER H. Grassland household contracting system from the perspective of property rights. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(3): 635-643. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0546
[21] 潘建伟, 张立中, 辛国昌. 草原生态补助奖励政策效益评估: 基于内蒙古呼伦贝尔新巴尔虎右旗的调查. 农业经济问题, 2020(9): 111-121. PAN J W, ZHANG L Z, XIN G C. Evaluation of the benefits of grassland ecological subsidy incentive policy: A survey based on the investigation of New Barag Right Banner in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia. Issues in Agricultural Economics, 2020(9): 111-121.
[22] 王晓毅, 张倩, 荀丽丽, 张浩. 贫困影响评价与资源利用: 以草原奖补政策和土地流转为例. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 33(5): 119-128. WANG X Y, ZHANG Q, XUN L L, ZHANG H. Poverty impact assessment and resource utilization: A case study of grassland incentive compensation policy and land circulation. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2016, 33(5): 119-128.
[23] 张正河, 张晓敏. 生态约束下牧户草地规模经营研究. 农业技术经济, 2015(6): 82-90. ZHANG Z H, ZHANG X M. A study on the large-scale management of herders under ecological constraints. Agricultural Technical Economics, 2015(6): 82-90.
[24] 杜富林, 张亚茜, 宋良媛. 草原畜牧业经营主体生产效率的比较研究: 基于锡林郭勒盟入户调查数据. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 46(4): 88-96. DU F L, ZHANG Y X, SONG L Y. Comparative study on production efficiency of grassland animal husbandry operators: Based on household survey data of Xilingol League. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019, 46(4): 88-96.
[25] 刘利珍, 张树军. 浅析草原承包经营权流转问题. 人民论坛, 2016(2): 82-84. LIU L Z, ZHANG S J. A brief analysis of the transfer of grassland contracted management rights. People’s BBS, 2016(2): 82-84.
[26] 李静, 孟梅. 新疆牧户人工牧草地流转意愿影响因素分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(3): 51-56. LI J, MENG M. Analysis of influencing factors influencing the circulation willingness of herdsmen in artificial pasture and grassland in Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(3): 51-56.
[27] 刘慧慧, 丁文强, 白荣, 尹燕亭, 侯向阳. 内蒙古地区牧户草地流转意愿影响因素研究. 家畜生态学报, 2021, 42(8): 64-69. LIU H H, DING W Q, BAI R, YIN Y T, HOU X Y. A study on the influencing factors of grassland turnover willingness of herders in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Livestock Ecology, 2021, 42(8): 64-69.
[28] 赖玉珮, 李文军. 草场流转对干旱半干旱地区草原生态和牧民生计影响研究: 以呼伦贝尔市新巴尔虎右旗M嘎查为例. 资源科学, 2012, 34(6): 1039-1048. LAI Y P, LI W J. A study on the influence of grassland circulation on grassland ecology and pastoral livelihood in arid and semi-arid areas: A case study of M Gacha, New Barag Right Banner, Hulunbuir City. Resources Science, 2012, 34(6): 1039-1048.
[29] 穆钰, 姹苏, 李文军. 草场流转对牧民生计和草原生态保护的影响分析: 基于锡林郭勒盟镶黄旗的案例研究. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(11): 84-96. MU Y, CHA S, LI W J. An analysis on the influence of grassland circulation on pastoral livelihood and grassland ecological protection: Based on the case study of Xianghuang Banner in Xilingol League. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(11): 84-96.
[30] DU F L, LIU Z J, SHUN J O. Factors affecting herdsmen’s grassland transfer in Inner Mongolia, China. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 2017, 51(3): 259-269. doi: 10.6090/jarq.51.259
[31] 马文芳, 孟梅, 唐洪松, 李静. 福海县牧民牧草地流转行为影响因素研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(8): 89-96. MA W F, MENG M, TANG H S, LI J. A study on the influencing factors of pastoral and grassland circulation behavior of herders in Fuhai County. China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(8): 89-96.
[32] 张小蕾, 樊文涛, 赵振媛, 李国梅, 杨东知, 唐增. 青藏高原牧户草地转入行为的影响因素分析: 基于495户牧民的调查. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(5): 128-133. ZHANG X L, FAN W T, ZHAO Z Y, LI G M, YANG D Z, TANG Z. Analysis of influencing factors of grassland transition behavior of herders on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Based on a survey of 495 herders. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(5): 128-133.
[33] 张美艳, 董建军, 辛姝玉, 赵达君, 张立中. 锡林郭勒盟草原流转牧户的技术效率研究: 基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(11): 62-68. ZHANG M Y, DONG J J, XIN Z Y, ZHAO D J, ZHANG L Z. Study on technical efficiency of shifting herders in Xilingol League grassland: Based on DEA-Tobit model. Resources and Environment in Arid Areas, 2017, 31(11): 62-68.
[34] 冯晓龙, 苏柳方, 唐建军. 草场流转备案、流转范围规制与牧户超载过牧行为. 农业技术经济, 2021(12): 4-16. FENG X L, SU L F, TANG J J. Record of grassland circulation regulation of circulation range and overgrazing behavior of herdsmen. Technical Economy of Agriculture, 2021(12): 4-16.
计量
- PDF下载量:
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: