甘南高寒牧区甘农2号小黑麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果
English
-
参考文献
[1] 穆锋海, 武高林. 甘南高寒草地畜牧业的可持续发展. 草业科学, 2005(3): 59-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.03.017 MU Z H, WU G L. The sustainable development of alpine grassland husbandry in Gannan. Pratacultural Science, 2005(3): 59-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.03.017
[2] 王敬龙, 拉巴, 多吉顿珠, 格桑次仁, 贡嘎桑布, 秦爱琼. 西藏牧草产业发展存在的问题和对策. 西藏科技, 2013(3): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2013.03.019 WANG J L, Laba, Duojidunzhu, Gesangciren, QIN A Q. Problems and countermeasures in the development of Tibet forage industry. Tibet Science and Technology, 2013(3): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2013.03.019
[3] 魏学红, 孙磊. 新形势下西藏草业科学的发展思路. 河北农业科学, 2009, 13(9): 165-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2009.09.064 WEI X H, SUN L. Development thinking on pratacultural science under new situation in Tibet. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 13(9): 165-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2009.09.064
[4] 陈军强, 李小刚, 张世挺, 周振, 丁路明. 甘南燕麦引种及其刈割期研究. 家畜生态学报, 2014, 35(9): 55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.09.011 CHEN J Q, LI X G, ZHANG S T, ZHOU Z, DIN L M. Study on oats introduction and harvesting stages in Gannan. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2014, 35(9): 55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.09.011
[5] 李佶恺, 孙涛, 旺扎, 李洪影, 崔国文. 西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.020 LI J K, SUN T, Wangzha, LI H Y, CUI G W. Effects on mixture sowing ratio on the yield and quality of both vetch and oat in Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.020
[6] 柴继宽. 轮作和连作对燕麦产量、品质、主要病虫害及土壤肥力的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 2012. CAI J K. Effects of crop rotation and continuing on productivity, quality, pests and diseases of qats and soil fertility. PhD Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2012.
[7] 王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高, 朱波. 豆科与禾本科牧草混播效应研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2007(4): 92-98. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2007.04.016 WANG X, ZENG Z H, HU Y G, ZHU B. Progress and prospect on mixture of gramineae herbage and leguminosae herbage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007(4): 92-98. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2007.04.016
[8] 李焰焰, 聂传朋, 董召荣. 优质饲草小黑麦的品种特性及研究现状. 安徽农业科学, 2005(6): 1093-1094, 1106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2005.06.087 LI Y Y, NIE C P, DONG Z R. Characteristic and current situation of Triticale. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2005(6): 1093-1094, 1106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2005.06.087
[9] 陈功, 李锦华, 周青平. 高寒牧区春箭筈豌豆生产性能的研究. 青海草业, 1999(3): 10-12. CHEN G, LI J H, ZHOU Q P. Study of production performance on Vicia sativa in alpine region. Qinghai Prataculture, 1999(3): 10-12.
[10] 代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华, 吴建平. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.010 DAI H L, TIAN X H, DU W H, WU J P. Study on grass yield and nutrient quality of forage type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.010
[11] 王伟, 徐成体, 德科加, 张明. 称多县燕麦与小黑麦引种试验初步研究. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2015, 45(5): 4-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7950.2015.05.002 WANG W, XU C T, DE K J, ZHANG M. Preliminary study on introduction experimental of oats and Triticale in Chengduo. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 45(5): 4-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7950.2015.05.002
[12] 谢开云, 王玉祥, 万江春, 张树振, 隋晓青, 赵云, 张博. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018184 XIE K Y, WANG Y X, WAN J C, ZHANG Z S, SUI X Q, ZHAO Y, ZHANG B. Mechanisms and factors affecting nitrogen transfer in mixed legume/grass swards: A review. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018184
[13] 王平. 半干旱地区禾–豆混播草地生产力及种间关系研究. 长春: 东北师范大学博士学位论文, 2006. WANG P. Research on interspecific relationship and productivity of grass–legume mixture in semi-arid area. PhD Thesis. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2006.
[14] 罗彩云, 赵亮, 赵新全, 徐世晓, 贺福全, 许茜, 陈昕. 青海湖地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆最佳混播比例的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.014 LUO C Y, ZHAO L, ZHAO X Q, XU S X, HE F Q, XU Q, CHEN X. Screening of seeding ratio of common vetch and oat mixture in Qinghai Lake area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.014
[15] 向洁, 王富强, 郭宝光, 王庆刚, 余成群, 沈振西, 邵小明. 西藏河谷区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混间作对产量和营养品质的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 555-564. XIANG J, WANG F Q, GUO B G, WANG Q G, YU C Q, SHEN Z X, SHAO X M. Effects of mixtures and intercropping of common vetch and oat in valley area of Tibet on the yield and quality. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(5): 555-564.
[16] 谢开云, 赵云, 李向林, 何峰, 万里强, 王丹, 韩冬梅. 豆–禾混播草地种间关系研究进展. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 284-296. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130337 XIE K Y, ZHAO Y, LI X L, HE F, WAN L Q, WANG D, HAN D M. Relationships between grasses and legumes in mixed grassland: a review. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 284-296. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130337
[17] 苟文龙. 川西平原一年生牧草禾豆混播群落生产力特征研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 2019. GOU W L. Study on productive features of annual grass-legume community in the western Sichuan Plain. PhD Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019.
[18] 周雅欣. 江淮地区燕麦与豆科牧草混播生产性能的研究及综合评价. 兰州: 兰州大学硕士学位论文, 2020. ZHOU Y X. Study and comprehensive evaluation on the production performance of the mixture of oats and legumes in Yangtze-Huaihe Region. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2020.
[19] 李强, 黄迎新, 钟荣珍, 孙海霞, 周道玮. 豆–禾混播草地中紫花苜蓿比例对其固氮效率的影响及潜在生理机制. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(13): 2647-2656. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.013 LI Q, HUANG Y X, ZHONG Z R, SUN H X, ZHOU D W. Influence of Medicago sativa proportion on its individual nitrogen fixation efficiency and underlying physiological mechanism in legume–grass mixture grassland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2647-2656. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.013
[20] 赵雅姣, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲草型小黑麦在定西地区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0340 ZHAO Y J, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on the optimal cutting period of forage triticale in Dingxi area. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0340
[21] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量监测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1998: 330-338. YANG S. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Monitoring Technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1998: 330-338.
[22] 杨秀芳, 陈玲玲, 乌艳红, 娜日苏, 吕宁, 梁庆伟. 应用灰色关联度综合评价26个青贮玉米的生产性能. 草业科学, 2012, 29(1): 105-111. YANG X F, CHEN L L, WU Y H, NA R S, LYUN, LIANG Q W. A comprehensive evaluation of the growth performance of 26silage maize genotypes using grey correlative degree analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2012, 29(1): 105-111.
[23] 赵方媛, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲料型小黑麦新品系种子产量及籽粒营养价值的分析. 草原与草坪, 2017, 37(3): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.03.012 ZHANG F Y, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on seed yield and grain nutritional value of new Triticale lines. Grassland and Turf, 2017, 37(3): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.03.012
[24] CORNELISSEN J H C, LAVOREL S, GARNIER E, DÍAZ S, BUCHMANN N, GURVICH D E, REICH P B, STEEGE H T, MORGAN H D, HEIJDEN M A. Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 2003, 51(4): 335. doi: 10.1071/BT02124
[25] 关卫星, 金涛, 宋国英, 彭君. 不同燕麦品种与箭舌豌豆的混播试验初报. 西藏农业科技, 2011, 33(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2925.2011.04.006 GUAN W X, JIN T, SONG G Y, PENG J. Preliminary report on mixed planting experiment of different oat varieties and arrow Pea. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 33(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2925.2011.04.006
[26] 刘晶, 赵方媛, 杜文华, 田新会. 甘肃省不同生态区高产优质小黑麦种质的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(5): 44-52. LIU J, ZHAO F Y, DU W H, TIAN X H. Screening of high yield and high quality triticale genotypes in different ecological regions of Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(5): 44-52.
[27] Moreira N. The effect of seed rate and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and nutritive value of oat-vetch mixtures. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1989, 112(1): 57-66. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600084100
[28] 董世魁, 马金星, 蒲小鹏, 张起荣, 潘臻武. 高寒地区多年生禾草引种生态适应性及混播组合筛选研究. 草原与草坪, 2003(1): 38-41, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2003.01.011 DONG S K, MA J L, PU X P, ZHANG Q R, PAN Z W. Study on the ecological adaptability of introduced perennial grasses and the selection of combinations in alpine region. Grassland and Turf, 2003(1): 38-41, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2003.01.011
[29] 马春晖, 韩建国. 高寒地区种植一年生牧草及饲料作物的研究. 中国草地, 2001(2): 50-55. MA C H, HAN J G. Studies on cultivated annual forage and crop in high cold area. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2001(2): 50-55.
[30] 张静, 赵成章, 盛亚萍, 张军霞, 史丽丽. 高寒山区混播草地燕麦和毛苕子种间竞争对密度的响应. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(7): 1605-1611. ZHANG J, ZHAO C Z, SHENG Y P, ZHANG J X, SHI L L. Inter-specific competition between Avena sativa and Vicia villosa in mixed owing grassland in alpine region of the Qilian Mountain in response to grass density. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(7): 1605-1611.
[31] 董永琴, 郭春英, 王华芬. 不同播种量对小黑麦不同品种的影响. 贵州农业科学, 1988(1): 17-22. DONG Y Q, GUO C Y, WANG H F. The effect of different seeding rates on different varieties of Triticale. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 1988(1): 17-22.
[32] 苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 王婷, 马啸, 周俗, 白史且, 师尚礼. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 473-481. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028 GOU W L, LI P, ZHANG J B, WANG T, MA X, ZHOU S, BAI S Q, SHI S L. Studies on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and nutritive value of annual ryegrass and common vetch mixtures. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 473-481. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028
[33] 张瑜, 高碧荣, 龙忠富, 李娟, 张建波. 饲用小黑麦与箭舌豌豆不同混播比例的生产效应. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(11): 112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.11.024 ZHANG Y, GAO B R, LONG Z F, LI J, ZHANG J B. Effects of different mixed seeding rates on triticale and vicia sativa yield. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(11): 112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.11.024
[34] 柳茜, 傅平, 敖学成, 苏茂, 孙启忠. 冬闲田多花黑麦草+光叶紫花苕混播草地生产性能与种间竞争的研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 42-46. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.006 LIU Q, FU P, AO X C, SU M, SUN Q Z. Study on production performance and interspecific competition of Italian ryegrass and villose vetch mixed grassland in winter fallow farmlands. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 42-46. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.006
[35] 孙杰, 巩林, 连露, 崔国文, 尹航, 张亚玲, 付佳琦. 海拔高度和混播比例对燕麦与箭筈豌豆产草量及质量的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698 SUN J, GONG L, LIAN L, CUI G W, YIN H, ZHANG Y L, FU J Q. Effect of altitude and mixed-sowing ratio on forage production and quality of oat and common vetch. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698
[36] 王旭, 曾昭海, 朱波, 胡跃高. 箭筈豌豆与燕麦不同间作混播模式对产量和品质的影响. 作物学报, 2007(11): 1892-1895. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.025 WANG X, ZENG Z H, ZHU B, HU Y G. Effect of different intercropping and mixture modes on forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007(11): 1892-1895. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.025
[37] ROSS S M, KING J R, O'DONOVAN J T, SPANER D. Intercropping ber-seem clover with barley and oat cultivars for forage. Agronomu Journal, 2004, 96: 1719-1729. doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.1719
[38] 兰兴平, 王峰. 禾本科牧草与豆科牧草混播的四大优点. 四川畜牧兽医, 2004(12): 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8964.2004.12.033 LAN X P, WANG F. Four advantages of mixed planting of gramineous forage and legume forage. Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2004(12): 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8964.2004.12.033
[39] 曹仲华, 魏军, 杨富裕, 曹社会. 西藏山南地区箭筈豌豆与丹麦“444”燕麦混播效应的研究. 西北农业学报, 2007(5): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2007.05.016 CAO Z H, WEI J, YANG F Y, CAO S H. Effects of the common vetch-oat mixture in the shannan region of Tibet. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2007(5): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2007.05.016
[40] 孙爱华, 鲁鸿佩, 马绍慧. 高寒地区箭筈豌豆+燕麦混播复种试验研究. 草业科学, 2003(8): 37-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.08.010 SUN A H, LU H P, MA S H. Experimental study of vetch + oat mixture system in highland region. Pratacultural Science, 2003(8): 37-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.08.010
[41] LITHOURGIDIS A S, VASILAKOGLOU I B, DHIMA K V, DORDAS C A, YIAKOULAKI M D. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 2006, 99(2/3): 0-11.
[42] 石永红, 符义坤, 李阳春, 张景雨. 半荒漠地区绿洲混播牧草群落稳定性与调控研究. 草业学报, 2000(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2000.03.001 SHI Y H, FU Y K, LI Y C, ZHANG J Y. Study on community stability of mixed pastures in semi desert area of Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2000(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2000.03.001
[43] 代寒凌. 高寒牧区小黑麦、黑麦和燕麦的生产性能和饲用品质比较. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2018. DAI H L. Comparisons on the productivity and quality for triticale, rye and oat in alpine pastoral area. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[44] 赵方媛, 王文, 陈平, 杜文华. 甘农2号小黑麦在云贵高原的生产性能研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 43-47, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.006 ZHAO F Y, WANG W, CHEN P, DU W H. Studies on the production performance of triticale in Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 43-47, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.006
[45] 马军, 郑伟, 张博, 加孜依拉·哈勒克. 基于马营养需求的燕麦–箭筈豌豆混播草地生产性能的评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348 MA J, ZHENG W, ZHANG B, Jziyila·Haleke. Production performance evaluation of oat–common vetch mixed pasture based on nutrient needs of horses. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348
-
![]()
图 1 不同混播比例间生产性能和营养价值的差异
B1、B2、B3、B4、B5、B6、B7、B8和B9分别表示箭筈豌豆和甘农2号小黑麦的播种比例为 0 ꞉ 100、20 ꞉ 80、30 ꞉ 70、40 ꞉ 60、50 ꞉ 50、60 ꞉ 40、70 ꞉ 30、80 ꞉ 20、100 ꞉ 0；下同。不同字母表示相同物种不同混播比例间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure 1. Production performance and nutritional value among the mixed sowing ratios
B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8和B9 indicate the ratio of vetch and triticale were 0 ꞉ 100，20 ꞉ 80，30 ꞉ 70，40 ꞉ 60，50 ꞉ 50，60 ꞉ 40，70 ꞉ 30，80 ꞉ 20，and 100 ꞉ 0; this is applicable for the following tables as well. Different lowercase letters within the same species indicate significant differences between different mixed sowing ratios at the 0.05 level.
表 1 混播组分、混播比例及其交互作用的方差分析(F值)
Table 1 Analysis of variance on the mixed component, mixed sowing ratios, and the interaction between the mixed component and sowing ratios
变异来源
Variation
source小黑麦株高
Plant height
of triticale箭筈豌豆株高
Plant height
of vetch枝条数
Number of
vetch branches干草产量
Hay yield粗蛋白
Crude protein中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent
fiber酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent
fiber混播组分
Mixed component8.59** 14.15** 6.95** 8.78** 0.02 11.39** 3.24* 混播比例
Mixed sowing ratios27.80** 40.35** 37.44** 23.99** 59.07** 152.76** 70.61** 混播组分 × 混播比例
Mixed component ×
Mixed sowing ratios9.58** 14.12** 14.39** 9.22** 18.68** 48.97** 22.25** *, P < 0.05；**, P < 0.01. 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 混播组分间生产性能和营养价值的差异
Table 2 Difference on the production performance among the mixed components
混播组分
Mixed
component小黑麦株高
Average height
of triticale/cm箭筈豌豆株高
Average height of
vetch/cm每公顷枝条数
Average number of
branches per hm2/ (× 104)干草产量
Average hay yield/
(t·hm−2)粗蛋白
Crude protein/
%中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent
fiber/%酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent
fiber/%A1 80.93 ± 6.63b 69.37 ± 5.87b 455.41 ± 30.01a 6.74 ± 0.33b 14.03 ± 0.42a 47.24 ± 1.22b 36.23 ± 0.54b A2 87.41 ± 7.47b 70.96 ± 5.89b 387.30 ± 31.91b 6.92 ± 0.47b 14.06 ± 0.49a 45.71 ± 1.13a 35.48 ± 0.61a A3 102.52 ± 7.58a 88.59 ± 7.24a 422.52 ± 27.21ab 8.18 ± 0.47a 14.00 ± 0.50a 47.65 ± 1.22b 35.95 ± 0.57ab A1、A2和A3分别表示绿箭1号、绿箭2号和绿箭431分别与甘农2号小黑麦混播；同列间不同小写字母表示不同混播组分间差异显著(P < 0.05)；下表同。
A1, A2, and A3 indicate Lvjian 1, Lvjian 2, and Lvjian 431 mixed with Gannong 2 triticale; different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences between different mixed components at the 0.05 level; this is applicable for the following tables as well.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 混播组分 × 混播比例间交互作用间生产性能和营养价值的差异
Table 3 Production performance and nutritional value for each mixed component and mixed sowing ratio treatment
处理
Treatment小黑麦株高
Plant height of
triticale/cm箭筈豌豆株高
Plant height of
vetch/cm枝条数
Number of branches
per hm2/(× 104)干草产量
Hay yield/
(t·hm−2)粗蛋白
Crude protein/
%中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent
fibe/%酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent
fibe/%A1B1 93.33 ± 18.56abc − 651.33 ± 37.49ab 6.62 ± 0.12def 11.21 ± 0.16jk 55.45 ± 1.16a 0.54 ± 0.61a A1B2 90.00 ± 17.56abc 78.33 ± 15.90defg 571.33 ± 21.09abcde 7.16 ± 0.43def 12.72 ± 0.61ghijk 53.67 ± 0.57abc 39.17 ± 0.39ab A1B3 90.00 ± 15.28abc 78.33 ± 19.22defg 617.67 ± 20.37abc 7.65 ± 1.10def 12.65 ± 0.16ghijk 52.51 ± 0.34abcd 38.18 ± 0.35bcde A1B4 91.67 ± 9.28abc 80.00 ± 10.41defg 488.67 ± 39.35defghi 7.92 ± 0.66cdef 13.58 ± 0.70fgh 50.32 ± 1.31defg 37.21 ± 0.83fbcdef A1B5 103.33 ± 15.90abc 95.00 ± 13.23abcde 511.00 ± 16.46cdefgh 8.32 ± 0.07cde 13.59 ± 0.93fgh 49.13 ± 0.59efgh 36.39 ± 0.60efgh A1B6 83.33 ± 8.82bc 75.00 ± 7.64defg 331.00 ± 24.58jkl 6.36 ± 0.89ef 14.22 ± 0.78defg 44.49 ± 0.83ij 35.58 ± 0.86fghi A1B7 88.33 ± 4.41abc 81.67 ± 6.67defg 440.00 ± 40.04fghij 6.74 ± 1.12def 14.66 ± 0.87cdef 43.09 ± 0.55jkl 34.13 ± 0.53ij A1B8 88.33 ± 4.41abc 75.00 ± 2.89defg 304.33 ± 29.69kl 6.68 ± 0.69def 15.36 ± 0.57cde 41.13 ± 0.60kl 33.88 ± 1.02ij A1B9 − 61.00 ± 0.58fg 183.33 ± 26.85mn 3.23 ± 0.19g 18.27 ± 0.77b 36.19 ± 1.15m 30.99 ± 0.16k A2B1 100.00 ± 16.07abc − 670.00 ± 9.82a 6.63 ± 0.25def 11.15 ± 0.38k 55.21 ± 0.73a 40.60 ± 0.37a A2B2 97.33 ± 3.71abc 68.33 ± 11.67efg 585.67 ± 20.22abcd 6.57 ± 0.58def 13.07 ± 0.34fghi 54.50 ± 0.61ab 39.00 ± 0.95abc A2B3 100.33 ± 5.77abc 81.67 ± 6.01defg 327.00 ± 12.5jkl 7.12 ± 0.19def 12.49 ± 0.29ghijk 47.83 ± 0.64gh 37.57 ± 0.58bcdef A2B4 108.00 ± 7.27ab 95.67 ± 7.22abcde 404.33 ± 5.93hijk 7.87 ± 0.16cdef 12.69 ± 0.20ghijk 46.60 ± 0.81hi 36.80 ± 0.23defg A2B5 108.33 ± 7.27ab 85.00 ± 2.89cdef 398.67 ± 8.69hijk 10.80 ± 0.97ab 12.96 ± 0.58fghij 44.78 ± 0.35ij 34.93 ± 0.39ghij A2B6 68.33 ± 34.40c 81.33 ± 14.11defg 363.33 ± 26.85ijkl 5.64 ± 1.18f 13.71 ± 0.39efg 44.14 ± 1.24ijk 34.41 ± 0.57hij A2B7 101.67 ± 4.41abc 88.67 ± 4.67bcdef 374.33 ± 87.01ijkl 8.84 ± 0.54bcd 14.61 ± 0.44cdef 43.39 ± 0.46jkl 33.30 ± 1.33j A2B8 102.67 ± 6.36abc 85.00 ± 10.41cdef 255.33 ± 4.98lm 6.00 ± 0.06ef 15.98 ± 0.64c 40.49 ± 0.55l 33.03 ± 0.28j A2B9 − 53.00 ± 6.25g 107.00 ± 5.77n 2.81 ± 0.01g 19.83 ± 0.64a 36.93 ± 1.38m 29.69 ± 0.41k A3B1 106.67 ± 4.41abc − 570.00 ± 97.13abcde 6.64 ± 0.47def 11.33 ± 0.31ijk 55.46 ± 0.81a 40.75 ± 0.61a A3B2 104.00 ± 2.31abc 87.00 ± 1.73bcdef 446.67 ± 24.01efghij 7.33 ± 0.19def 11.80 ± 0.10hijk 54.83 ± 0.76lab 38.83 ± 0.37abcd A3B3 122.00 ± 11.85ab 114.67 ± 12.46ab 337.67 ± 33.79jkl 9.88 ± 0.36abc 12.55 ± 0.82ghijk 51.98 ± 0.75bcde 38.28 ± 0.61bcde A3B4 122.00 ± 5.29ab 115.00 ± 2.89ab 430.00 ± 28.5ghijk 9.93 ± 0.13abc 12.80 ± 0.24ghijk 51.17 ± 0.59cdef 37.02 ± 0.81cdef A3B5 122.67 ± 3.71ab 112.67 ± 4.81abc 560.33 ± 95.28abcdef 11.15 ± 0.15a 13.25 ± 0.51fgh 48.56 ± 2.03fgh 35.72 ± 0.63fghi A3B6 113.67 ± 13.04ab 100.33 ± 11.55abcd 413.00 ± 15.59ghijk 8.29 ± 1.86cde 14.67 ± 0.33cdef 46.78 ± 1.77hi 34.15 ± 0.55ij A3B7 127.67 ± 4.33a 117.33 ± 1.45a 533.33 ± 31.79bcdef 10.11 ± 0.51abc 15.47 ± 0.24cd 41.79 ± 0.93jkl 33.48 ± 0.35j A3B8 103.33 ± 8.82abc 90.33 ± 3.18abcde 325.00 ± 36.94jkl 6.59 ± 0.94def 14.17 ± 0.51defg 42.90 ± 1.20jkl 34.21 ± 0.81ij A3B9 − 60.00 ± 1.16fg 186.67 ± 10.84mn 3.68 ± 0.27g 19.98 ± 0.38a 36.57 ± 0.45m 31.13 ± 0.40k 同列不同小写字母表示不同混播组分和比例间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences between treatments at the 0.05 level.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 关联系数及关联度排名
Table 4 Association coefficient and relevance ranking
处理
Treatment加权关联度
Correlative
degree排序
Rank处理
Treatment加权关联度
Correlative
degree排序
RankA1 0.5459 3 A1B9 0.5590 14 A2 0.6393 2 A2B1 0.4898 26 A3 0.9416 1 A2B2 0.5019 24 B1 0.4956 9 A2B3 0.5280 19 B2 0.5269 8 A2B4 0.5640 12 B3 0.6044 4 A2B5 0.7166 3 B4 0.6407 3 A2B6 0.5065 23 B5 0.8344 1 A2B7 0.6480 6 B6 0.5550 7 A2B8 0.5541 15 B7 0.6823 2 A2B9 0.5910 9 B8 0.5667 6 A3B1 0.4907 25 B9 0.6000 5 A3B2 0.5207 21 A1B1 0.4897 25 A3B3 0.6762 5 A1B2 0.5205 22 A3B4 0.6861 4 A1B3 0.5429 17 A3B5 0.8321 1 A1B4 0.5663 11 A3B6 0.6079 7 A1B5 0.5894 10 A3B7 0.7541 2 A1B6 0.5267 20 A3B8 0.5422 18 A1B7 0.5513 16 A3B9 0.5984 8 A1B8 0.5627 13
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 穆锋海, 武高林. 甘南高寒草地畜牧业的可持续发展. 草业科学, 2005(3): 59-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.03.017 MU Z H, WU G L. The sustainable development of alpine grassland husbandry in Gannan. Pratacultural Science, 2005(3): 59-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.03.017
[2] 王敬龙, 拉巴, 多吉顿珠, 格桑次仁, 贡嘎桑布, 秦爱琼. 西藏牧草产业发展存在的问题和对策. 西藏科技, 2013(3): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2013.03.019 WANG J L, Laba, Duojidunzhu, Gesangciren, QIN A Q. Problems and countermeasures in the development of Tibet forage industry. Tibet Science and Technology, 2013(3): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2013.03.019
[3] 魏学红, 孙磊. 新形势下西藏草业科学的发展思路. 河北农业科学, 2009, 13(9): 165-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2009.09.064 WEI X H, SUN L. Development thinking on pratacultural science under new situation in Tibet. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 13(9): 165-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2009.09.064
[4] 陈军强, 李小刚, 张世挺, 周振, 丁路明. 甘南燕麦引种及其刈割期研究. 家畜生态学报, 2014, 35(9): 55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.09.011 CHEN J Q, LI X G, ZHANG S T, ZHOU Z, DIN L M. Study on oats introduction and harvesting stages in Gannan. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2014, 35(9): 55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.09.011
[5] 李佶恺, 孙涛, 旺扎, 李洪影, 崔国文. 西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.020 LI J K, SUN T, Wangzha, LI H Y, CUI G W. Effects on mixture sowing ratio on the yield and quality of both vetch and oat in Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.020
[6] 柴继宽. 轮作和连作对燕麦产量、品质、主要病虫害及土壤肥力的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 2012. CAI J K. Effects of crop rotation and continuing on productivity, quality, pests and diseases of qats and soil fertility. PhD Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2012.
[7] 王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高, 朱波. 豆科与禾本科牧草混播效应研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2007(4): 92-98. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2007.04.016 WANG X, ZENG Z H, HU Y G, ZHU B. Progress and prospect on mixture of gramineae herbage and leguminosae herbage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007(4): 92-98. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2007.04.016
[8] 李焰焰, 聂传朋, 董召荣. 优质饲草小黑麦的品种特性及研究现状. 安徽农业科学, 2005(6): 1093-1094, 1106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2005.06.087 LI Y Y, NIE C P, DONG Z R. Characteristic and current situation of Triticale. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2005(6): 1093-1094, 1106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2005.06.087
[9] 陈功, 李锦华, 周青平. 高寒牧区春箭筈豌豆生产性能的研究. 青海草业, 1999(3): 10-12. CHEN G, LI J H, ZHOU Q P. Study of production performance on Vicia sativa in alpine region. Qinghai Prataculture, 1999(3): 10-12.
[10] 代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华, 吴建平. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.010 DAI H L, TIAN X H, DU W H, WU J P. Study on grass yield and nutrient quality of forage type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.010
[11] 王伟, 徐成体, 德科加, 张明. 称多县燕麦与小黑麦引种试验初步研究. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2015, 45(5): 4-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7950.2015.05.002 WANG W, XU C T, DE K J, ZHANG M. Preliminary study on introduction experimental of oats and Triticale in Chengduo. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 45(5): 4-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7950.2015.05.002
[12] 谢开云, 王玉祥, 万江春, 张树振, 隋晓青, 赵云, 张博. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018184 XIE K Y, WANG Y X, WAN J C, ZHANG Z S, SUI X Q, ZHAO Y, ZHANG B. Mechanisms and factors affecting nitrogen transfer in mixed legume/grass swards: A review. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018184
[13] 王平. 半干旱地区禾–豆混播草地生产力及种间关系研究. 长春: 东北师范大学博士学位论文, 2006. WANG P. Research on interspecific relationship and productivity of grass–legume mixture in semi-arid area. PhD Thesis. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2006.
[14] 罗彩云, 赵亮, 赵新全, 徐世晓, 贺福全, 许茜, 陈昕. 青海湖地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆最佳混播比例的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.014 LUO C Y, ZHAO L, ZHAO X Q, XU S X, HE F Q, XU Q, CHEN X. Screening of seeding ratio of common vetch and oat mixture in Qinghai Lake area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.014
[15] 向洁, 王富强, 郭宝光, 王庆刚, 余成群, 沈振西, 邵小明. 西藏河谷区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混间作对产量和营养品质的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 555-564. XIANG J, WANG F Q, GUO B G, WANG Q G, YU C Q, SHEN Z X, SHAO X M. Effects of mixtures and intercropping of common vetch and oat in valley area of Tibet on the yield and quality. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(5): 555-564.
[16] 谢开云, 赵云, 李向林, 何峰, 万里强, 王丹, 韩冬梅. 豆–禾混播草地种间关系研究进展. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 284-296. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130337 XIE K Y, ZHAO Y, LI X L, HE F, WAN L Q, WANG D, HAN D M. Relationships between grasses and legumes in mixed grassland: a review. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 284-296. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130337
[17] 苟文龙. 川西平原一年生牧草禾豆混播群落生产力特征研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 2019. GOU W L. Study on productive features of annual grass-legume community in the western Sichuan Plain. PhD Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019.
[18] 周雅欣. 江淮地区燕麦与豆科牧草混播生产性能的研究及综合评价. 兰州: 兰州大学硕士学位论文, 2020. ZHOU Y X. Study and comprehensive evaluation on the production performance of the mixture of oats and legumes in Yangtze-Huaihe Region. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2020.
[19] 李强, 黄迎新, 钟荣珍, 孙海霞, 周道玮. 豆–禾混播草地中紫花苜蓿比例对其固氮效率的影响及潜在生理机制. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(13): 2647-2656. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.013 LI Q, HUANG Y X, ZHONG Z R, SUN H X, ZHOU D W. Influence of Medicago sativa proportion on its individual nitrogen fixation efficiency and underlying physiological mechanism in legume–grass mixture grassland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2647-2656. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.013
[20] 赵雅姣, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲草型小黑麦在定西地区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0340 ZHAO Y J, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on the optimal cutting period of forage triticale in Dingxi area. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0340
[21] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量监测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1998: 330-338. YANG S. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Monitoring Technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1998: 330-338.
[22] 杨秀芳, 陈玲玲, 乌艳红, 娜日苏, 吕宁, 梁庆伟. 应用灰色关联度综合评价26个青贮玉米的生产性能. 草业科学, 2012, 29(1): 105-111. YANG X F, CHEN L L, WU Y H, NA R S, LYUN, LIANG Q W. A comprehensive evaluation of the growth performance of 26silage maize genotypes using grey correlative degree analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2012, 29(1): 105-111.
[23] 赵方媛, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲料型小黑麦新品系种子产量及籽粒营养价值的分析. 草原与草坪, 2017, 37(3): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.03.012 ZHANG F Y, TIAN X H, DU W H. Studies on seed yield and grain nutritional value of new Triticale lines. Grassland and Turf, 2017, 37(3): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.03.012
[24] CORNELISSEN J H C, LAVOREL S, GARNIER E, DÍAZ S, BUCHMANN N, GURVICH D E, REICH P B, STEEGE H T, MORGAN H D, HEIJDEN M A. Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 2003, 51(4): 335. doi: 10.1071/BT02124
[25] 关卫星, 金涛, 宋国英, 彭君. 不同燕麦品种与箭舌豌豆的混播试验初报. 西藏农业科技, 2011, 33(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2925.2011.04.006 GUAN W X, JIN T, SONG G Y, PENG J. Preliminary report on mixed planting experiment of different oat varieties and arrow Pea. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 33(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2925.2011.04.006
[26] 刘晶, 赵方媛, 杜文华, 田新会. 甘肃省不同生态区高产优质小黑麦种质的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(5): 44-52. LIU J, ZHAO F Y, DU W H, TIAN X H. Screening of high yield and high quality triticale genotypes in different ecological regions of Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(5): 44-52.
[27] Moreira N. The effect of seed rate and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and nutritive value of oat-vetch mixtures. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1989, 112(1): 57-66. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600084100
[28] 董世魁, 马金星, 蒲小鹏, 张起荣, 潘臻武. 高寒地区多年生禾草引种生态适应性及混播组合筛选研究. 草原与草坪, 2003(1): 38-41, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2003.01.011 DONG S K, MA J L, PU X P, ZHANG Q R, PAN Z W. Study on the ecological adaptability of introduced perennial grasses and the selection of combinations in alpine region. Grassland and Turf, 2003(1): 38-41, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2003.01.011
[29] 马春晖, 韩建国. 高寒地区种植一年生牧草及饲料作物的研究. 中国草地, 2001(2): 50-55. MA C H, HAN J G. Studies on cultivated annual forage and crop in high cold area. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2001(2): 50-55.
[30] 张静, 赵成章, 盛亚萍, 张军霞, 史丽丽. 高寒山区混播草地燕麦和毛苕子种间竞争对密度的响应. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(7): 1605-1611. ZHANG J, ZHAO C Z, SHENG Y P, ZHANG J X, SHI L L. Inter-specific competition between Avena sativa and Vicia villosa in mixed owing grassland in alpine region of the Qilian Mountain in response to grass density. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(7): 1605-1611.
[31] 董永琴, 郭春英, 王华芬. 不同播种量对小黑麦不同品种的影响. 贵州农业科学, 1988(1): 17-22. DONG Y Q, GUO C Y, WANG H F. The effect of different seeding rates on different varieties of Triticale. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 1988(1): 17-22.
[32] 苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 王婷, 马啸, 周俗, 白史且, 师尚礼. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 473-481. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028 GOU W L, LI P, ZHANG J B, WANG T, MA X, ZHOU S, BAI S Q, SHI S L. Studies on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and nutritive value of annual ryegrass and common vetch mixtures. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 473-481. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028
[33] 张瑜, 高碧荣, 龙忠富, 李娟, 张建波. 饲用小黑麦与箭舌豌豆不同混播比例的生产效应. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(11): 112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.11.024 ZHANG Y, GAO B R, LONG Z F, LI J, ZHANG J B. Effects of different mixed seeding rates on triticale and vicia sativa yield. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(11): 112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.11.024
[34] 柳茜, 傅平, 敖学成, 苏茂, 孙启忠. 冬闲田多花黑麦草+光叶紫花苕混播草地生产性能与种间竞争的研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 42-46. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.006 LIU Q, FU P, AO X C, SU M, SUN Q Z. Study on production performance and interspecific competition of Italian ryegrass and villose vetch mixed grassland in winter fallow farmlands. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 42-46. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.006
[35] 孙杰, 巩林, 连露, 崔国文, 尹航, 张亚玲, 付佳琦. 海拔高度和混播比例对燕麦与箭筈豌豆产草量及质量的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698 SUN J, GONG L, LIAN L, CUI G W, YIN H, ZHANG Y L, FU J Q. Effect of altitude and mixed-sowing ratio on forage production and quality of oat and common vetch. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10): 2438-2449. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0698
[36] 王旭, 曾昭海, 朱波, 胡跃高. 箭筈豌豆与燕麦不同间作混播模式对产量和品质的影响. 作物学报, 2007(11): 1892-1895. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.025 WANG X, ZENG Z H, ZHU B, HU Y G. Effect of different intercropping and mixture modes on forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007(11): 1892-1895. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.025
[37] ROSS S M, KING J R, O'DONOVAN J T, SPANER D. Intercropping ber-seem clover with barley and oat cultivars for forage. Agronomu Journal, 2004, 96: 1719-1729. doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.1719
[38] 兰兴平, 王峰. 禾本科牧草与豆科牧草混播的四大优点. 四川畜牧兽医, 2004(12): 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8964.2004.12.033 LAN X P, WANG F. Four advantages of mixed planting of gramineous forage and legume forage. Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2004(12): 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8964.2004.12.033
[39] 曹仲华, 魏军, 杨富裕, 曹社会. 西藏山南地区箭筈豌豆与丹麦“444”燕麦混播效应的研究. 西北农业学报, 2007(5): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2007.05.016 CAO Z H, WEI J, YANG F Y, CAO S H. Effects of the common vetch-oat mixture in the shannan region of Tibet. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2007(5): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2007.05.016
[40] 孙爱华, 鲁鸿佩, 马绍慧. 高寒地区箭筈豌豆+燕麦混播复种试验研究. 草业科学, 2003(8): 37-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.08.010 SUN A H, LU H P, MA S H. Experimental study of vetch + oat mixture system in highland region. Pratacultural Science, 2003(8): 37-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.08.010
[41] LITHOURGIDIS A S, VASILAKOGLOU I B, DHIMA K V, DORDAS C A, YIAKOULAKI M D. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 2006, 99(2/3): 0-11.
[42] 石永红, 符义坤, 李阳春, 张景雨. 半荒漠地区绿洲混播牧草群落稳定性与调控研究. 草业学报, 2000(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2000.03.001 SHI Y H, FU Y K, LI Y C, ZHANG J Y. Study on community stability of mixed pastures in semi desert area of Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2000(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2000.03.001
[43] 代寒凌. 高寒牧区小黑麦、黑麦和燕麦的生产性能和饲用品质比较. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2018. DAI H L. Comparisons on the productivity and quality for triticale, rye and oat in alpine pastoral area. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[44] 赵方媛, 王文, 陈平, 杜文华. 甘农2号小黑麦在云贵高原的生产性能研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 43-47, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.006 ZHAO F Y, WANG W, CHEN P, DU W H. Studies on the production performance of triticale in Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 43-47, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.01.006
[45] 马军, 郑伟, 张博, 加孜依拉·哈勒克. 基于马营养需求的燕麦–箭筈豌豆混播草地生产性能的评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348 MA J, ZHENG W, ZHANG B, Jziyila·Haleke. Production performance evaluation of oat–common vetch mixed pasture based on nutrient needs of horses. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0348
计量
- PDF下载量: 88
- 文章访问数: 2320
- HTML全文浏览量: 859
