欢迎访问 草业科学,今天是2025年4月12日 星期六!

人造草垫对混合草坪景观质量、生物量及根系生长的影响

张桐瑞, 李富翠, 李辉, 季双旋, 范志浩, 韩烈保

张桐瑞,李富翠,李辉,季双旋,范志浩,韩烈保. 人造草垫对混合草坪景观质量、生物量及根系生长的影响. 草业科学, 2020, 37(6): 1058-1065 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.20196-0626
引用本文: 张桐瑞,李富翠,李辉,季双旋,范志浩,韩烈保. 人造草垫对混合草坪景观质量、生物量及根系生长的影响. 草业科学, 2020, 37(6): 1058-1065 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.20196-0626
ZHANG T R, LI F C, LI H, JI S X, FAN Z H, HAN L B. Effects of carpet on turf performance quality, biomass, and root growth of hybrid turf. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(6): 1058-1065 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.20196-0626
Citation: ZHANG T R, LI F C, LI H, JI S X, FAN Z H, HAN L B. Effects of carpet on turf performance quality, biomass, and root growth of hybrid turf. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(6): 1058-1065 . DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.20196-0626

人造草垫对混合草坪景观质量、生物量及根系生长的影响

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(31971770)
摘要: 为研究人造草垫式混合草坪中人造草垫对草坪草生长的影响,本研究以多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)品种 ‘名仕’ 和高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)品种‘皇冠’为研究材料,以无草垫处理为对照,研究多年生黑麦草和高羊茅单播以及二者混播条件下,人造草垫对草坪的景观质量、地上地下生物量和草坪草根系形态的影响。结果表明:草垫处理降低了草坪的色泽等景观质量,与无草垫对照组的色泽相比,多年生黑麦草和高羊茅单播以及二者混播条件下草垫处理分别降低了3.8%、5.3%和3.9%。同时,草垫处理降低了草坪草地上生物量,多年生黑麦草和高羊茅单播条件下草垫处理较对照组分别降低了11.8%和16.9%。从垫下根系部分的根系形态参数看,有草垫处理的根系长度、根总表面积和根系总体积均在不同程度上低于无草垫处理。因此,人造草垫式混合草坪中,草垫在不同程度上抑制了垫下部根系生长,进而影响地上部分的生长。

 

English

  • [1]

    LULLI F, VOLTERRANI M, MAGNI S, ARMEN R. An innovative hybrid natural–artificial sports pitch construction system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 2011, 225(3): 171-175. doi: 10.1177/1754338X10392311

    [2]

    XtraGrass Hybrid Turf System. XtraGrass hybrid system feels like and plays like natural grass. (2015-11-30) [2019-08-22] https://www.xtragrass-hybrid-turf.com/.

    [3]

    ANDREWS C. Hybrid football pitches: Why the grass is always greener. (2016-10-11) [219-08-22] https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2016/10/hybrid-football-pitches-why-the-grass-is-always-greener/.

    [4] 满达, 包永霞, 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 运动场草坪的坪床加固技术研究进展. 草业科学, 2010, 27(7): 41-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2010.07.009

    MAN D, BAO Y X, SONG G L, HAN L B. Research progress on strengthening technology for turf bed in the sports field. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(7): 41-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2010.07.009

    [5] 满达. 天然草与人造草混合系统草坪特性研究. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文, 2011.

    MAN D. Researches on The characteristics of natural-artificial turf. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.

    [6] 麦靖雯, 武鑫, 徐彦花, 张巨明. 3种冷季型草坪草建植的混合草坪比较与评价. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(7): 46-52.

    MAI J W, WU X, XU Y H, ZHANG J M. Comparison and evaluation of natural-synthetic hybrid sports system with three types of cold season turfgrass. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 46(7): 46-52.

    [7] 金雨蒙. 中超比赛因武汉五环体育中心草坪质量问题延期. (2019-04-07)[2019-12-20] http://hb.people.com.cn/n2/2019/0407/c192237-32817023.html.

    JIN Y M. China Super Games delayed because of the turf quality of Wuhan Five Rings Sports Center. (2019-04-07)[2019-12-20] http://hb.people.com.cn/n2/2019/0407/c192237-32817023.html.

    [8] ROBERT D E. 草坪科学与管理. 冯钟粒, 张守先 (译). 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992.

    ROBERT D E. Turf Science and Management. FENG Z L, ZHANG S X (tran.). Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1992.

    [9] 黄德青, 于兰, 张耀生, 赵新全. 祁连山北坡天然草地地上生物量及其与土壤水分关系的比较研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 20-27. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110302

    HUANG D Q, YU L, ZHANG Y S, ZHAO X Q. Above-ground biomass and its relationship to soil moisture of natural grassland in the northern slopes of the Qilian Mountains. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 20-27. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110302

    [10] 罗耀, 张巨明, 叶振华, 时佩, 陆璃, 龚广. 广州亚运会运动场草坪建植质量调查与分析. 草原与草坪, 2012, 32(4): 28-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2012.04.006

    LUO Y, ZHANG J M, YE Z H, SHI P, LU L, GONG G. Investigation and evaluation on the quality of sports turf of Guangzhou Asian Games. Grassland and Turf, 2012, 32(4): 28-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2012.04.006

    [11] 武鑫. 天然草与人造草混合运动场草坪系统研究. 广州: 华南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2017.

    WU X. Study on natural-synthetic hybrid sports turf system. Master Thesis. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2017.

    [12] 徐洪雨, 王英宇, 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 华北土石山区公路边坡常见植物根系地下分布特征. 中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(2): 51-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2013.02.009

    XU H Y, WANG Y Y, SONG G L, HAN L B. Characteristics of root system distribution of common plants on freeway slopes in earthy-rocky mountain area of North China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 11(2): 51-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2013.02.009

    [13] 杨振亚, 周本智, 陈庆标, 葛晓改, 王小明, 曹永慧, 童冉, 石洋. 干旱对杉木幼苗根系构型及非结构性碳水化合物的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740.

    YANG Z Y, ZHOU B Z, CHEN Q B, GE X G, WANG X M, CAO Y H, TONG R, SHI Y. Effects of drought on root architecture and non-structural carbohydrate of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740.

    [14]

    HEJDUK S, HRABE F. Influence of different systems of grazing: Type of swards and fertilizing on underground phytomass of pastures. Plant Soil and Environment, 2010, 49: 18-23.

    [15] 李丹丹, 宗俊勤, 郭海林, 陈静波, 张有海, 周震东, 刘建秀. 不同坪床配比对‘阳江’狗牙根草坪耐践踏性的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 72-83. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018451

    LI D D, ZONG J Q, GUO H L, CHEN J B, ZHANG Y H, ZHOU Z D, LIU J X. Effect of different turf-bed soil ratios on the traffic resistance of ‘Yangjiang’ bermudagrass sports turf. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(8): 72-83. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018451

    [16] 嵇晓雷. 基于植被根系分布形态的生态边坡稳定性研究. 南京: 南京林业大学博士学位论文, 2013.

    JI X L. A roots distribution-based study on the stability of ecological slope. PhD Thesis. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2013.

    [17]

    BEARD J B. Turfgrass Science and Culture. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1973: 325-361.

    [18]

    BEARD J B. Turf Management for Golf Course. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1982: 95-119.

    [19] 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 足球场草坪运动质量影响因素的研究进展. 中国草地, 2003, 25(1): 54-62.

    SONG G L, HAN L B. Research progress of effect factors on the playing quality of soccer pitches. Grassland of China, 2003, 25(1): 54-62.

    [20]

    BAKER S W, RICHARDS C W. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the quality of sand rootzones used for winter games pitches. Veterinarska Stanica, 1994, 106(6): 107-118.

    [21] 张鹏飞. 不同梳草和打孔强度对暖季型高尔夫果岭草坪的影响. 南昌: 江西农业大学硕士论文, 2016.

    ZHANG P F. Effects of different intensity of the comb grass and punch on the warm-season green turf. Master Thesis. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2016.

  • 图  1   坪床剖面示意图

    Figure  1.   Profile of seedbed

    图  2   草垫对不同播种条件下草坪草地上、地下生物量的影响

    Figure  2.   Effect of carpet on aboveground and underground biomass under different seeding conditions

    图  3   草垫对不同播种条件下草坪草根冠比的影响

    Figure  3.   Effect of carpet on root-shoot ratios under different seeding conditions

    图  4   草垫对不同播种条件下草坪草垫上、垫下生物量及其比值的影响

    Figure  4.   Effect of carpet on biomass and ratio of root under and above the carpet under different seeding conditions

    图  5   草垫对不同播种条件下草坪草垫下根系形态参数的影响

    Figure  5.   Effect of carpet on root morphological parameters under the carpet under different seeding conditions

    表  1   粒径分析表

    Table  1   Particle size analysis

    类型
    Type
    粒径
    Particle size/mm
    含量
    Content/%
    粗砾 Fine gravel > 2.0 3.0
    极粗砾 Very coarse sand 1.0~2.0 2.0
    粗砂 Coarse sand 0.5~1.0 22.0
    中砂 Medium sand 0.25~0.5 40.5
    细沙 Fine sand 0.1~0.25 24.5
    粉粒 Silt < 0.1 8.0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   草垫对不同播种条件下草坪景观质量的影响

    Table  2   Effect of carpet on turf performance quality under different seeding conditions

    处理
    Treatment
    色泽   
    Color  
    密度   
    Density/(shoot·cm–2)  
    株高   
    Plant height/cm   
    景观质量打分   
    Performance quality 
    PR+C 6.31 ± 0.04 3.06 ± 0.17 21.63 ± 0.17 6.50 ± 0.29
    PR 6.56 ± 0.06* 4.17 ± 0.40* 27.75 ± 0.63* 6.75 ± 0.25
    TF+C 6.30 ± 0.03 2.51 ± 0.10 29.83 ± 0.10 6.13 ± 0.43
    TF 6.65 ± 0.11* 2.37 ± 0.19 25.73 ± 0.19 6.25 ± 0.85
    Mixed+C 6.37 ± 0.06 2.58 ± 0.37 22.25 ± 0.04 6.75 ± 0.25
    Mixed 6.63 ± 0.11* 2.78 ± 0.12 25.63 ± 0.12 7.00 ± 0.41
     * 表示同一播种条件下有草垫和无草垫处理间差异显著(P < 0.05);PR:多年生黑麦草单播;TF:高羊茅单播;Mixed:多年生黑麦草与高羊茅混播;+C:加人工草垫;图2图3图4图5同。
     * indicate significant difference between two carpet treatments under the same sowing mode at the 0.05 level; PR: perennial ryegrass monoculture; TF: tall fescue monoculture; Mixed: perennial ryegrass and tall fescue mixture; +C: with artificial woven; this is applicable for Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 as well.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    LULLI F, VOLTERRANI M, MAGNI S, ARMEN R. An innovative hybrid natural–artificial sports pitch construction system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 2011, 225(3): 171-175. doi: 10.1177/1754338X10392311

    [2]

    XtraGrass Hybrid Turf System. XtraGrass hybrid system feels like and plays like natural grass. (2015-11-30) [2019-08-22] https://www.xtragrass-hybrid-turf.com/.

    [3]

    ANDREWS C. Hybrid football pitches: Why the grass is always greener. (2016-10-11) [219-08-22] https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2016/10/hybrid-football-pitches-why-the-grass-is-always-greener/.

    [4] 满达, 包永霞, 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 运动场草坪的坪床加固技术研究进展. 草业科学, 2010, 27(7): 41-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2010.07.009

    MAN D, BAO Y X, SONG G L, HAN L B. Research progress on strengthening technology for turf bed in the sports field. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(7): 41-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2010.07.009

    [5] 满达. 天然草与人造草混合系统草坪特性研究. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文, 2011.

    MAN D. Researches on The characteristics of natural-artificial turf. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.

    [6] 麦靖雯, 武鑫, 徐彦花, 张巨明. 3种冷季型草坪草建植的混合草坪比较与评价. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(7): 46-52.

    MAI J W, WU X, XU Y H, ZHANG J M. Comparison and evaluation of natural-synthetic hybrid sports system with three types of cold season turfgrass. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 46(7): 46-52.

    [7] 金雨蒙. 中超比赛因武汉五环体育中心草坪质量问题延期. (2019-04-07)[2019-12-20] http://hb.people.com.cn/n2/2019/0407/c192237-32817023.html.

    JIN Y M. China Super Games delayed because of the turf quality of Wuhan Five Rings Sports Center. (2019-04-07)[2019-12-20] http://hb.people.com.cn/n2/2019/0407/c192237-32817023.html.

    [8] ROBERT D E. 草坪科学与管理. 冯钟粒, 张守先 (译). 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992.

    ROBERT D E. Turf Science and Management. FENG Z L, ZHANG S X (tran.). Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1992.

    [9] 黄德青, 于兰, 张耀生, 赵新全. 祁连山北坡天然草地地上生物量及其与土壤水分关系的比较研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 20-27. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110302

    HUANG D Q, YU L, ZHANG Y S, ZHAO X Q. Above-ground biomass and its relationship to soil moisture of natural grassland in the northern slopes of the Qilian Mountains. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 20-27. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110302

    [10] 罗耀, 张巨明, 叶振华, 时佩, 陆璃, 龚广. 广州亚运会运动场草坪建植质量调查与分析. 草原与草坪, 2012, 32(4): 28-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2012.04.006

    LUO Y, ZHANG J M, YE Z H, SHI P, LU L, GONG G. Investigation and evaluation on the quality of sports turf of Guangzhou Asian Games. Grassland and Turf, 2012, 32(4): 28-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2012.04.006

    [11] 武鑫. 天然草与人造草混合运动场草坪系统研究. 广州: 华南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2017.

    WU X. Study on natural-synthetic hybrid sports turf system. Master Thesis. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2017.

    [12] 徐洪雨, 王英宇, 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 华北土石山区公路边坡常见植物根系地下分布特征. 中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(2): 51-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2013.02.009

    XU H Y, WANG Y Y, SONG G L, HAN L B. Characteristics of root system distribution of common plants on freeway slopes in earthy-rocky mountain area of North China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 11(2): 51-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2013.02.009

    [13] 杨振亚, 周本智, 陈庆标, 葛晓改, 王小明, 曹永慧, 童冉, 石洋. 干旱对杉木幼苗根系构型及非结构性碳水化合物的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740.

    YANG Z Y, ZHOU B Z, CHEN Q B, GE X G, WANG X M, CAO Y H, TONG R, SHI Y. Effects of drought on root architecture and non-structural carbohydrate of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740.

    [14]

    HEJDUK S, HRABE F. Influence of different systems of grazing: Type of swards and fertilizing on underground phytomass of pastures. Plant Soil and Environment, 2010, 49: 18-23.

    [15] 李丹丹, 宗俊勤, 郭海林, 陈静波, 张有海, 周震东, 刘建秀. 不同坪床配比对‘阳江’狗牙根草坪耐践踏性的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 72-83. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018451

    LI D D, ZONG J Q, GUO H L, CHEN J B, ZHANG Y H, ZHOU Z D, LIU J X. Effect of different turf-bed soil ratios on the traffic resistance of ‘Yangjiang’ bermudagrass sports turf. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(8): 72-83. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018451

    [16] 嵇晓雷. 基于植被根系分布形态的生态边坡稳定性研究. 南京: 南京林业大学博士学位论文, 2013.

    JI X L. A roots distribution-based study on the stability of ecological slope. PhD Thesis. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2013.

    [17]

    BEARD J B. Turfgrass Science and Culture. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1973: 325-361.

    [18]

    BEARD J B. Turf Management for Golf Course. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1982: 95-119.

    [19] 宋桂龙, 韩烈保. 足球场草坪运动质量影响因素的研究进展. 中国草地, 2003, 25(1): 54-62.

    SONG G L, HAN L B. Research progress of effect factors on the playing quality of soccer pitches. Grassland of China, 2003, 25(1): 54-62.

    [20]

    BAKER S W, RICHARDS C W. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the quality of sand rootzones used for winter games pitches. Veterinarska Stanica, 1994, 106(6): 107-118.

    [21] 张鹏飞. 不同梳草和打孔强度对暖季型高尔夫果岭草坪的影响. 南昌: 江西农业大学硕士论文, 2016.

    ZHANG P F. Effects of different intensity of the comb grass and punch on the warm-season green turf. Master Thesis. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2016.

图(5)  /  表(2)
计量
  • PDF下载量:  34
  • 文章访问数:  2816
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1270
  • 被引次数: 0
文章相关
  • 通讯作者: 韩烈保
  • 收稿日期:  2019-12-24
  • 接受日期:  2020-03-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-05-28
  • 发布日期:  2020-05-31

目录

/

返回文章
返回