4个多年生黑麦草品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应
English
-
参考文献
[1] HUANG J, YU H, GUAN X, WANG G, GUO R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(2): 166. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2837
[2] TRENBERTH K E. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Research, 2011, 47(1/2): 123-138.
[3] WANG W, VINOCUR B, SHOSEYOV O, ALTMAN A. Biotechnology of plant osmotic stress tolerance physiological and molecular considerations. Acta Horticulture, 2000, 560: 285-292.
[4] 王福祥, 肖开转, 姜身飞, 曲梦宇, 连玲, 何炜, 陈丽萍, 谢华安, 张建福. 干旱胁迫下植物体内活性氧的作用机制. 科学通报, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. doi: 10.1360/N972018-01116 WANG F X, XIAO K Z, JIANG S F, QU M Y, LIAN L, HE W, CHEN L P, XIE H A, ZHANG J F. Mechanisms of reactive oxygen species in plants under drought stress. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. doi: 10.1360/N972018-01116
[5] 赖金莉, 李欣欣, 薛磊, 陈凌艳, 荣俊冬, 何天友, 郑郁善. 植物抗旱性研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(17): 23-27. LAI J L, LI X X, XUE L, CHEN L Y, RONG J D, HE T Y, ZHENG Y S. Research progress on drought resistance of plants. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(17): 23-27.
[6] ZABET M, HOSSEINZADEH A, AHMADI A, KHIALPARAST F. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in mung bean (Vigna radiate). Joural of Agriculture Science and Technology, 2003, 34(4): 889-898.
[7] 魏永胜, 梁宗锁, 山仑, 张辰露. 利用隶属函数值法评价苜蓿抗旱性. 草业科学, 2005, 22(6): 33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.06.008 WEI Y S, LIANG Z S, SHAN L, ZHANG C L. Comprehensive evaluation on alfalfa drought-resistance traits by subordinate function values analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(6): 33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.06.008
[8] 周碧华, 毕玉芬, 侯旭光. 根冠淀粉水解法鉴定多年生黑麦草抗旱性. 草业科学, 1994, 11(3): 49-51. ZHOU B H, BI Y F, HOU X G. Starch hydrolyzed method of tip cap to diagnose the drought resistance of prennial ryegrass. Pratacultural Science, 1994, 11(3): 49-51.
[9] 刘杰, 江生泉. 3种草坪草在滁州地区成坪质量比较研究. 佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(4): 83-86. LIU J, JIANG S Q. Comparative study on the quality of three turfgrass in Chuzhou area. Journal of Foshan University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 83-86.
[10] 陈振德, 傅以彬, 邹琦, 程炳嵩, 梁作勤. 二甲亚砜和丙酮混合法测定叶绿素含量. 山东农业大学学报, 1989(2): 34-38. CHEN Z D, FU Y B, ZOU Q, CHENG B S, LIANG Z Q. Determination of chlorophyll content by the mixed method of dimethyl sulphoxide with acetone. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1989(2): 34-38.
[11] 张金民, 任晓雪, 秦伟, 陈昆. 干旱胁迫对西瓜叶抗氧化酶活性、叶绿素荧光参数及根系活力的影响. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(11): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2018.11.001 ZHANG J M, REN X X, QIN W, CHEN K. Effects of drought stress on antioxidant enzyme activities, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and root activity of watermelon leaves. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 24(11): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2018.11.001
[12] 陈嫣嫣, 王瑛, 张林娟. 黄金菊抗寒性生理指标的测定研究. 上海建设科技, 2018(5): 63-66, 88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6637.2018.05.019 CHEN Y Y, WANG Y, ZHANG L J. Study on the determination of physiological indexes of resistance to Chrysanthemum frutescens. Shanghai Construction Science & Technology, 2018(5): 63-66, 88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6637.2018.05.019
[13] 朱爱民, 张玉霞, 王显国, 王月林, 张庆昕, 侯文慧, 杜晓艳. 不同施氮水平对羊草抗衰老能力的影响. 草原与草坪, 2019(2): 39-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.006 ZHU A M, ZHANG Y X, WANG X G, WANG Y L, ZHANG Q X, HOU W H, DU X Y. Effects of applying nitrogen fertilizer on leaf senescence characteristics of Leymus chinensis in sandy land. Grassland and Turf, 2019(2): 39-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.006
[14] 沈文飚, 徐朗莱, 叶茂炳, 张荣铣. 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性测定的探讨. 植物生理学通讯, 1996(3): 203-205. SHEN W B, XU L L, YE M B, ZHANG R X. Study on determination of ASP activity. Plant Physiology Communications, 1996(3): 203-205.
[15] 许桂芳. 用隶属函数法对4种地被植物的耐热性综合评价. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2): 57-60. XU G F. Comprehensive evaluation of heat tolerance of four ground covering plants by subordinate function values analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(2): 57-60.
[16] 曹志华, 吴中能, 蔡如胜, 刘俊龙, 高健. 安徽省不同毛竹种源抗寒性生长生理指标的综合评价. 竹子学报, 2018, 37(3): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2018.03.008 CAO Z H, WU Z N, CAI R S, LIU J L, GAO J. Comprehensive evaluation on the growth and physiological indexes of cold resistance of different phllostachys edulis provenance in Anhui Province. Jouranal of Bamboo Research, 2018, 37(3): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2018.03.008
[17] 李鹏程, 陈奇凌, 王晶晶. 干旱胁迫下不同产地酸枣抗性生理指标综合评价. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(4): 618-625. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.04.004 LI P C, CHEN Q L, WANG J J. Comprehensive evaluation of the wild Jujube resistance physiological indexes in different producing areas under the condition of drought stress. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(4): 618-625. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.04.004
[18] 郭慧, 吕长平, 郑智, 刘飞, 丁丁. 园林植物抗旱性研究进展. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(7): 53-55. GUO H, LYU C P, ZHENG Z, LIU F, DING D. Advances in researh of drought resistance of landscape plants. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 15(7): 53-55.
[19] 宋娅丽, 王莎, 王克勤, 张倩, 马志, 陈佳钰, 李珠宇. 3种冷季型草坪草苗期对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(3): 9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2018.03.002 SONG Y L, WANG S, WANG K Q, ZHANG Q, MA Z, CHEN J Y, LI Z Y. Physiological and ecological responses of three cool-season turfgrasses to drought stress at seedling stage. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(3): 9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2018.03.002
[20] 及利, 韩姣, 王芳, 王君, 宋笛, 张丽杰, 祁永会, 杨雨春. 干旱胁迫对不同土壤基质下核桃楸幼苗的生理特性的影响. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 722-732. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.011 JI L, HAN J, WANG F, WANG J, SONG D, ZHANG L J, QI YH, YANG Y C. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of Juglans mandshurica seedlings in different soil substrates. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(5): 722-732. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.011
[21] 桑子阳, 马履一, 陈发菊. 干旱胁迫对红花玉兰幼苗生长和生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(1): 109-115. SANG Z Y, MA L Y, CHEN F J. Growth and physiological characteristics of Magnolia wufengensis seedlings under drought stress. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 109-115.
[22] 吴成龙, 尹金来, 徐阳春, 刘兆普, 沈其荣, 周春霖. 碱胁迫对菊芋幼苗生长及其光合作用和抗氧化作用的影响. 西北植物学报, 2006(3): 447-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.03.003 WU C L, YIN J L, XU Y C, LIU Z P, SHEN Q R, ZHOU C L. Effects of alkaline stress on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidation of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006(3): 447-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.03.003
[23] 覃鹏, 刘叶菊, 刘飞虎. 干旱胁迫对烟草叶片丙二醛含量和细胞膜透性的影响. 亚热带植物科学, 2004(4): 8-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2004.04.003 QIN P, LIU Y J, LIU F H. Effects of drought stress on malondiadehyde content and cell membrane permeability in tobacco leaves. Subtropical Plant Science, 2004(4): 8-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2004.04.003
[24] 李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 周健. 盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517. LI Z Y, CONG R C, YANG Q S, ZHOU J. Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517.
[25] 孙晓春, 黄文静, 李铂, 汪荔, 唐志书. 外源水杨酸对干旱胁迫下桔梗幼苗生理生化指标的影响. 北方园艺, 2019(16): 121-125. SUN X C, WANG W J, LI B, WANG L, TANG Z S. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on physiological characteristics of seedlings under drought stress of Platycodon grandiflorus. Northern Horticulture, 2019(16): 121-125.
[26] 黄婵. 植物抗旱生理基础研究进展. 农村实用技术, 2019(6): 62-64. HUANG C. Advances in research on physiological basis of plant drought resistance. Applicable Technologies for Rural Areas, 2019(6): 62-64.
-
![]()
图 1 不同程度干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草草坪品质得分与枯叶率
不同大写字母表示相同品种不同处理之间差异显著(P < 0.05)，不同小写字母表示相同处理不同品种之间差异显著(P < 0.05)；下同。
Figure 1. Perennial ryegrass turf quality and dead leaf rate under different degrees of drought stress
Different capital letters indicate significant differences between the different treatments of the same variety at the 0.05 level, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties of the same treatment at the 0.05 level; similarly for the following tables and figures.
![]()
图 2 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草地上部含水量与叶绿素含量
Figure 2. Water content and chlorophyll content in perennial ryegrass under drought stress
![]()
图 3 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草丙二醛和过氧化氢含量
Figure 3. Malondialdehyde and H2O2 content of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
![]()
图 4 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草超氧化物歧化酶活性
Figure 4. Superoxide dismutase activity of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
![]()
图 5 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草过氧化物酶活性
Figure 5. Peroxidase activity of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
![]()
图 6 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草过氧化氢酶活性
Figure 6. Catalase activity of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
![]()
图 7 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性
Figure 7. Ascorbate peroxidase activity of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
表 1 干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草地上部生长高度与根系生长长度
Table 1 Growth height and root length of perennial ryegrass under drought stress
PEG浓度
PEG concentration/%地上部生长高度 Aboveground growth height/cm 根系生长长度 Root growth length/cm 百灵鸟 Lark 维达斯 Vidas Pr521 Pr525 百灵鸟 Lark 维达斯 Vidas Pr521 Pr525 0 (CK) 7.67 ± 1.47Ab 16.50 ± 0.84Aa 14.67 ± 0.95Aa 7.13 ± 0.39Ab 10.31 ± 0.38Abc 10.47 ± 0.30Ab 9.26 ± 0.50Ac 13.35 ± 0.99Aa 10 6.14 ± 0.59ABc 15.42 ± 0.86Aa 11.92 ± 0.35Bb 5.56 ± 0.77Bc 9.90 ± 0.45Aab 8.95 ± 1.00Bbc 8.38 ± 0.41ABc 10.50 ± 0.48Ba 15 5.45 ± 0.32BCc 13.85 ±.051Ba 9.21 ± 0.19Cb 4.42 ± 0.16Cd 8.27 ± 0.50Ba 8.00 ± 0.78Bca 7.76 ± 1.01BCa 8.97 ± 0.45Ca 20 4.33 ± 0.38Cc 11.63 ± 0.80Ca 7.25 ± 0.42Db 3.75 ± 0.46Cc 7.07 ± 0.05Ca 7.12 ± 0.39Ca 6.79 ± 0.84Ca 7.72 ± 0.42Da 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 4个品种多年生黑麦草对干旱胁迫的耐受性综合评价
Table 2 Comprehensive evaluation of tolerance of four varieties of perennial ryegrass to drought stress
生长生理指标 Growth physiological index 百灵鸟 Lark 维达斯 Vidas Pr521 Pr525 草坪质量 Turf quality 0.39 0.30 0.46 0.44 枯叶率 Dead leaf rate 0.51 0.51 0.50 0.27 地上部生长高度 Aboveground growth height 0.39 0.54 0.43 0.46 根系生长长度 Root growth length 0.51 0.45 0.55 0.40 地上部含水量 Aboveground water content 0.51 0.61 0.60 0.51 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content 0.50 0.47 0.55 0.39 超氧化物歧化酶活性 SOD activity 0.50 0.39 0.56 0.42 过氧化物酶活性 POD activity 0.46 0.45 0.38 0.35 过氧化氢酶活性 CAT activity 0.38 0.50 0.51 0.48 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性 APX activity 0.39 0.53 0.30 0.42 MDA含量 MDA activity 0.63 0.50 0.54 0.40 H2O2含量 H2O2 activity 0.58 0.57 0.48 0.58 平均值 Average value 0.479 0.485 0.488 0.427 耐旱能力排序 Rank of drought tolerance 3 2 1 4
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] HUANG J, YU H, GUAN X, WANG G, GUO R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(2): 166. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2837
[2] TRENBERTH K E. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Research, 2011, 47(1/2): 123-138.
[3] WANG W, VINOCUR B, SHOSEYOV O, ALTMAN A. Biotechnology of plant osmotic stress tolerance physiological and molecular considerations. Acta Horticulture, 2000, 560: 285-292.
[4] 王福祥, 肖开转, 姜身飞, 曲梦宇, 连玲, 何炜, 陈丽萍, 谢华安, 张建福. 干旱胁迫下植物体内活性氧的作用机制. 科学通报, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. doi: 10.1360/N972018-01116 WANG F X, XIAO K Z, JIANG S F, QU M Y, LIAN L, HE W, CHEN L P, XIE H A, ZHANG J F. Mechanisms of reactive oxygen species in plants under drought stress. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. doi: 10.1360/N972018-01116
[5] 赖金莉, 李欣欣, 薛磊, 陈凌艳, 荣俊冬, 何天友, 郑郁善. 植物抗旱性研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(17): 23-27. LAI J L, LI X X, XUE L, CHEN L Y, RONG J D, HE T Y, ZHENG Y S. Research progress on drought resistance of plants. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(17): 23-27.
[6] ZABET M, HOSSEINZADEH A, AHMADI A, KHIALPARAST F. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in mung bean (Vigna radiate). Joural of Agriculture Science and Technology, 2003, 34(4): 889-898.
[7] 魏永胜, 梁宗锁, 山仑, 张辰露. 利用隶属函数值法评价苜蓿抗旱性. 草业科学, 2005, 22(6): 33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.06.008 WEI Y S, LIANG Z S, SHAN L, ZHANG C L. Comprehensive evaluation on alfalfa drought-resistance traits by subordinate function values analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(6): 33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.06.008
[8] 周碧华, 毕玉芬, 侯旭光. 根冠淀粉水解法鉴定多年生黑麦草抗旱性. 草业科学, 1994, 11(3): 49-51. ZHOU B H, BI Y F, HOU X G. Starch hydrolyzed method of tip cap to diagnose the drought resistance of prennial ryegrass. Pratacultural Science, 1994, 11(3): 49-51.
[9] 刘杰, 江生泉. 3种草坪草在滁州地区成坪质量比较研究. 佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(4): 83-86. LIU J, JIANG S Q. Comparative study on the quality of three turfgrass in Chuzhou area. Journal of Foshan University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 83-86.
[10] 陈振德, 傅以彬, 邹琦, 程炳嵩, 梁作勤. 二甲亚砜和丙酮混合法测定叶绿素含量. 山东农业大学学报, 1989(2): 34-38. CHEN Z D, FU Y B, ZOU Q, CHENG B S, LIANG Z Q. Determination of chlorophyll content by the mixed method of dimethyl sulphoxide with acetone. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1989(2): 34-38.
[11] 张金民, 任晓雪, 秦伟, 陈昆. 干旱胁迫对西瓜叶抗氧化酶活性、叶绿素荧光参数及根系活力的影响. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(11): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2018.11.001 ZHANG J M, REN X X, QIN W, CHEN K. Effects of drought stress on antioxidant enzyme activities, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and root activity of watermelon leaves. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 24(11): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2018.11.001
[12] 陈嫣嫣, 王瑛, 张林娟. 黄金菊抗寒性生理指标的测定研究. 上海建设科技, 2018(5): 63-66, 88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6637.2018.05.019 CHEN Y Y, WANG Y, ZHANG L J. Study on the determination of physiological indexes of resistance to Chrysanthemum frutescens. Shanghai Construction Science & Technology, 2018(5): 63-66, 88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6637.2018.05.019
[13] 朱爱民, 张玉霞, 王显国, 王月林, 张庆昕, 侯文慧, 杜晓艳. 不同施氮水平对羊草抗衰老能力的影响. 草原与草坪, 2019(2): 39-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.006 ZHU A M, ZHANG Y X, WANG X G, WANG Y L, ZHANG Q X, HOU W H, DU X Y. Effects of applying nitrogen fertilizer on leaf senescence characteristics of Leymus chinensis in sandy land. Grassland and Turf, 2019(2): 39-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2019.02.006
[14] 沈文飚, 徐朗莱, 叶茂炳, 张荣铣. 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性测定的探讨. 植物生理学通讯, 1996(3): 203-205. SHEN W B, XU L L, YE M B, ZHANG R X. Study on determination of ASP activity. Plant Physiology Communications, 1996(3): 203-205.
[15] 许桂芳. 用隶属函数法对4种地被植物的耐热性综合评价. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2): 57-60. XU G F. Comprehensive evaluation of heat tolerance of four ground covering plants by subordinate function values analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(2): 57-60.
[16] 曹志华, 吴中能, 蔡如胜, 刘俊龙, 高健. 安徽省不同毛竹种源抗寒性生长生理指标的综合评价. 竹子学报, 2018, 37(3): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2018.03.008 CAO Z H, WU Z N, CAI R S, LIU J L, GAO J. Comprehensive evaluation on the growth and physiological indexes of cold resistance of different phllostachys edulis provenance in Anhui Province. Jouranal of Bamboo Research, 2018, 37(3): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2018.03.008
[17] 李鹏程, 陈奇凌, 王晶晶. 干旱胁迫下不同产地酸枣抗性生理指标综合评价. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(4): 618-625. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.04.004 LI P C, CHEN Q L, WANG J J. Comprehensive evaluation of the wild Jujube resistance physiological indexes in different producing areas under the condition of drought stress. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(4): 618-625. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.04.004
[18] 郭慧, 吕长平, 郑智, 刘飞, 丁丁. 园林植物抗旱性研究进展. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(7): 53-55. GUO H, LYU C P, ZHENG Z, LIU F, DING D. Advances in researh of drought resistance of landscape plants. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 15(7): 53-55.
[19] 宋娅丽, 王莎, 王克勤, 张倩, 马志, 陈佳钰, 李珠宇. 3种冷季型草坪草苗期对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(3): 9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2018.03.002 SONG Y L, WANG S, WANG K Q, ZHANG Q, MA Z, CHEN J Y, LI Z Y. Physiological and ecological responses of three cool-season turfgrasses to drought stress at seedling stage. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(3): 9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2018.03.002
[20] 及利, 韩姣, 王芳, 王君, 宋笛, 张丽杰, 祁永会, 杨雨春. 干旱胁迫对不同土壤基质下核桃楸幼苗的生理特性的影响. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 722-732. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.011 JI L, HAN J, WANG F, WANG J, SONG D, ZHANG L J, QI YH, YANG Y C. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of Juglans mandshurica seedlings in different soil substrates. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(5): 722-732. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.011
[21] 桑子阳, 马履一, 陈发菊. 干旱胁迫对红花玉兰幼苗生长和生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(1): 109-115. SANG Z Y, MA L Y, CHEN F J. Growth and physiological characteristics of Magnolia wufengensis seedlings under drought stress. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 109-115.
[22] 吴成龙, 尹金来, 徐阳春, 刘兆普, 沈其荣, 周春霖. 碱胁迫对菊芋幼苗生长及其光合作用和抗氧化作用的影响. 西北植物学报, 2006(3): 447-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.03.003 WU C L, YIN J L, XU Y C, LIU Z P, SHEN Q R, ZHOU C L. Effects of alkaline stress on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidation of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006(3): 447-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.03.003
[23] 覃鹏, 刘叶菊, 刘飞虎. 干旱胁迫对烟草叶片丙二醛含量和细胞膜透性的影响. 亚热带植物科学, 2004(4): 8-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2004.04.003 QIN P, LIU Y J, LIU F H. Effects of drought stress on malondiadehyde content and cell membrane permeability in tobacco leaves. Subtropical Plant Science, 2004(4): 8-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2004.04.003
[24] 李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 周健. 盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517. LI Z Y, CONG R C, YANG Q S, ZHOU J. Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517.
[25] 孙晓春, 黄文静, 李铂, 汪荔, 唐志书. 外源水杨酸对干旱胁迫下桔梗幼苗生理生化指标的影响. 北方园艺, 2019(16): 121-125. SUN X C, WANG W J, LI B, WANG L, TANG Z S. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on physiological characteristics of seedlings under drought stress of Platycodon grandiflorus. Northern Horticulture, 2019(16): 121-125.
[26] 黄婵. 植物抗旱生理基础研究进展. 农村实用技术, 2019(6): 62-64. HUANG C. Advances in research on physiological basis of plant drought resistance. Applicable Technologies for Rural Areas, 2019(6): 62-64.
计量
- PDF下载量: 34
- 文章访问数: 2656
- HTML全文浏览量: 1225
