围封对当雄县高寒草原土壤微生物和酶活性的影响
摘要:
过度放牧会严重破坏土壤生态系统,造成土壤退化,土壤一旦退化,即使很长年限也难以恢复。本研究通过围栏禁牧(1、4、6年)对青藏高原当雄县高寒草原退化草地进行修复,分析围封时间对高寒草原土壤理化性质、土壤微生物和酶活性的影响,以期阐明围封对高寒退化草地修复的影响。结果表明,与放牧土壤相比,围封1、4和6年的草地土壤水溶性有机碳和水溶性有机氮含量显著提高(P<0.05),围封6年的土壤含水量显著增加,pH值显著降低;围封显著改变了土壤蔗糖酶和L-天冬酰胺酶活性,土壤蔗糖酶和L-天冬酰胺酶活性均随着围封年限的延长有增加的趋势;围封6年土壤细菌、放线菌和革兰氏阳性细菌含量相比放牧显著升高。因此,围封不仅会引起土壤物理化学性质的变化,而且土壤酶活性与土壤微生物群落结构都会发生相应改变。Pearson相关性分析表明,水溶性有机碳、水溶性有机氮、土壤水均与土壤酶活性和微生物类群生物量显著或极显著(P<0.01)相关,因此这些指标可以指示退化草地修复状况。围栏禁牧有利于提高土壤易降解有机质含量,从而促进微生物生长,加速营养物质循环,促进高寒草原生态系统的恢复。
English
-
-
[1] Angeloni N L,Jankowski K J,Tuchman N C,Tuchman J K.Effects of an invasive cattail species (Typha×glauca) on sediment nitrogen and microbial community composition in a freshwater wetland[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters.2006,263(1):86-92Vossbrinck C R,Coleman D C,Woolley T A.Abiotic and biotic factors in litter decomposition in a semiarid grassland[J].Ecology.1979,60(2):265-271Vincent J M.Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes.Utah:Academic Press,National Library of Australia Cataloguing in Publication Data,1982.Roy S,Singh J S.Consequences of habitat heterogeneity for availability of nutrients in a dry tropical forest[J].Journal of Ecology.1994,82(3):503-509王启兰,曹广民,王长庭.放牧对小嵩草草甸土壤酶活性及土壤环境因素的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报.2007,13(5):856-864Aon M A,Colanerl A C.Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physicochemical properties in an agricultural soil[J].Applied Soil Ecology.2001,18(3):255-270李文华,周兴民.青藏高原生态系统及优化利用模式.广州:广东科技出版社,1998.鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.北京:农业出版社,1987.Jones D L,Willett V B.Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry.2006,38(5):991-999关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法.北京:农业出版社,1986.White D,Davis W,Nickels J,King J,Bobbie R.Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate[J].Oecologia.1979,40(1):51-62Federle T W,Dobbins D C,Thorntonmanning J R,Jones D D.Microbial biomass,activity,and community structure in subsurface soils[J].Ground Water.1986,24(3):365-374Frostegard A,Baath E,Tunlid A.Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty-acid analysis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry.1993,25(6):723-730Kroppenstedt R.Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms.Goodfellow M,Minnikin D E.Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics.Utah:Academic Press,1985.Zelles L,Bai Q Y,Ma R X,Rackwitz R,Winter K,Beese F.Microbial biomass,metabolic activity and nutritional-status determined from fatty-acid patterns and poly-hydroxybutyrate in agriculturally-managed soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry.1994,26(4):439-446Zogg G P,Zak D R,Ringelberg D B,MacDonald N W,Pregitzer K S,White D C.Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal.1997,61(2):475-481Mutabaruka R,Hairiah K,Cadisch G.Microbial degradation of hydrolysable and condensed tannin polyphenol-protein complexes in soils from different land-use histories[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry.2007,39(7):1479-1492陈珊,张常钟,刘东波,张镇瑗,杨靖春,王志霞.东北羊草草原土壤微生物生物量的季节变化及其与土壤生境的关系[J].生态学报.1995,15(1):91-94Kandeler E,Luxhoi J,Tscherko M,Magid J.Xylanase,invertase and protease at the soil litter interface of a loamy sand[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry.1999,31(8):1171-1179Su Y Z,Li Y L,Cui J Y,Zhao W Z.Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded early grassland,Inner Mongolia,northern China[J].Catena.2005,59(3):267-278
计量
- PDF下载量: 505
- 文章访问数: 1634
- HTML全文浏览量: 98